FranzBernhard Posted September 12, 2017 Share Posted September 12, 2017 Hello, again I would like to ask for your kind help. I have two sectioned fossils from the Campanian Gosau basin of Kainach, Styria, Austria (St. Bartholomä-Formation). They are accompanied by radiolitid rudists (R), but I don´t think that they are rudists by itself. Could these be some kind of sponges? But I can not see any spicules. Frist specimen is 13.5 cm high, sections are ca. 3 mm apart. Second specimen is 11.5 cm wide, sections are ca. 16 mm apart. There is nothing visible on the wheatered surface, except some Radiolitid fragments. I know this website: http://www.cretaceous.de/ But I have not found anything definitive about sponges of the Austrian Gosau formations. Maybe someone can give me a hint? Thank you very much for your help! Franz Bernhard Specimen 1 Specimen 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arizona Chris Posted September 12, 2017 Share Posted September 12, 2017 It does look pretty spongey. Usually, you cant see spicules in fossil sponges, they are too small to fossilize well or are mixed in with the silica entombing the sponge. Maybe a Leucon Hexactanellid? ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Arizona Chris Paleo Web Site: http://schursastrophotography.com/fossiladventures.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
abyssunder Posted September 12, 2017 Share Posted September 12, 2017 They look to be rudists, to me, but it will be difficult to make an assignment to a genus or species. If I compare the picture of your specimen with the one from here, I can see similar patterns suggesting rudist, not sponge. " We are not separate and independent entities, but like links in a chain, and we could not by any means be what we are without those who went before us and showed us the way. " Thomas Mann My Library Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FranzBernhard Posted September 13, 2017 Author Share Posted September 13, 2017 Thank you for your comments, Arizona Chris and abyssunder! So it is even difficult to assign a phylum... I forgot do mention, that the lowermost, small radiolitid is clearly growing on the fossil in question. Thanks again, Franz Bernhard Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now