Anngottesman Posted September 26, 2017 Author Share Posted September 26, 2017 Another pic. I managed to add a couple more pics. Got a loope as well. The dark parts don't looked painted and they have texture. But a small Part of one of the leg bones looks like it was possibly carved from the stone? Wish I could see a real one of these in person. Everything is 3 dimentional (raised) to some degree or less. I realize the prep is not too pretty. Can anyone tell anything regarding authenticity from these pictures? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anngottesman Posted September 26, 2017 Author Share Posted September 26, 2017 Thanks for info on adding photos. After replying and refreshing I can post one at a time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anngottesman Posted September 26, 2017 Author Share Posted September 26, 2017 Is it normal for stone to be so much lighter in areas near where fossil is carved out? I see this in photos of some fossils but others don't have such a noticeable difference in shade of stone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ynot Posted September 26, 2017 Share Posted September 26, 2017 2 minutes ago, Anngottesman said: Is it normal for stone to be so much lighter in areas near where fossil is carved out? I see this in photos of some fossils but others don't have such a noticeable difference in shade of stone. Depends on the matrix, some will show a pronounced difference (like the matrix that these lizards are in.). Darwin said: " Man sprang from monkeys." Will Rogers said: " Some of them didn't spring far enough." My Fossil collection - My Mineral collection My favorite thread on TFF. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anngottesman Posted September 26, 2017 Author Share Posted September 26, 2017 Thank you Ynot. So it seems this is not a red flag in itself. I'm learning that if you don't see a lot of real fossils in person , it's hard to tell from photos of real fossils if the one you have is authentic. Wish I could compare the one I have to an authenticated real Keichousaurus or similar fossil in person. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anngottesman Posted September 27, 2017 Author Share Posted September 27, 2017 Here's a picture in sunlight where you can see the shadows. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobby Rico Posted September 27, 2017 Share Posted September 27, 2017 1 hour ago, Anngottesman said: Thanks for info on adding photos. After replying and refreshing I can post one at a time. Hi this looks the best you have shone us so far. Bobby Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fossildude19 Posted September 27, 2017 Share Posted September 27, 2017 Here is what I'm seeing on this fossil: Tim - VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER VFOTM --- APRIL - 2015 __________________________________________________ "In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks." John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~ ><))))( *> About Me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anngottesman Posted September 27, 2017 Author Share Posted September 27, 2017 Very helpful Fossildude! Love the arrows. It's like you're right with me. Yes I see what you pointed out and this is obviously a poor prep job. I noticed what you referred to. Although I don't see any paint, there are many missing bones and partially prepped bones. I'll scrape underneath in a small area to see if there's any dark bone in there. I paid very little though , since I just wanted to get a "real" fossil so I could see what a real one looks like, I'd be happy if you thing this is a (mostly) real, fossil but a poor specimen. (Perhaps I can learn how to uncover some more bone to improve some parts. ) Do you think this is a real but badly prepped Keich? I only paid $90. I don't know...maybe that was too muchfor a real, but badly prepped fossil? Here's one more picture I took. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aplomado Posted September 27, 2017 Share Posted September 27, 2017 I can't say that one looks fake, because it doesn't. It's a awful prep job though, if that were mine I'd return it and buy one that was better done. It looks like the skull is mostly ground away. I got one from the same seller that was much better done. Just my opinion. I paid $108 for mine. The seller has mostly rotten pics, that makes it harder to find a good one. Most of his don't look too good from the pics. I got lucky. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anngottesman Posted September 27, 2017 Author Share Posted September 27, 2017 Hi Aplomado! Yes, you DID get a nice specimen! I was thinking of exchanging the one I got for this one which I think is a little better. What do you think? I'll post another photo of back legs and tail after I send this one since I can only send one picture at a time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anngottesman Posted September 27, 2017 Author Share Posted September 27, 2017 Does the head of this Keich look like a composite- taken from another fossil or does it look to be the head that belongs to this body? I love the details on this one... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malcolmt Posted September 27, 2017 Share Posted September 27, 2017 Looks composite, the cracks in the rock do not carry through where the joins are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fossildude19 Posted September 28, 2017 Share Posted September 28, 2017 1 hour ago, Malcolmt said: Looks composite, the cracks in the rock do not carry through where the joins are. Hard to tell from a picture, but faulting can do this to fossils. Tim - VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER VFOTM --- APRIL - 2015 __________________________________________________ "In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks." John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~ ><))))( *> About Me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
piranha Posted September 28, 2017 Share Posted September 28, 2017 If someone wanted to take the time to make a composite, they would certainly expend the effort to line up the cervical vertebrae. Fossil fakery always wants to maximize the bottom line. This one appears to be authentic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anngottesman Posted September 28, 2017 Author Share Posted September 28, 2017 Thanks for your opinions. I really like the details. I also seem to think it may be authentic because it appears the rock may have shifted because when you line it up like you did it looks like both sides were part of the same stone. How did you do that? I may take a chance on this and get it so I can look at in person. If it's authentic it looks like one that is better prepped than the others I've seen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.