Jump to content

Fossil in sideritic ironstone


DE&i

Recommended Posts

Found another interesting specimen on this Nodule from Smokejacks quarry, measuring under a 1.0mm approximately 0.3mm in length, was quite difficult to photograph. First impression due to it’s almost wing like features I would suggest possible insect. As the concretions of sideritic ironstone and fine grained calcareous sandstone have also yielded numerous insect remains including non-angiospermous plants (ferns and cycads, and a Sequoia-type cone).

 

59cbd4ab5236a_NodulefromSmokejacksBrickworks.jpg.c0fa6d7cf52ad8b241151f32e7bc1c2a.jpg59cbd51a6fc96_fossilfromtheWealClay(1).thumb.jpg.8dbb72f0497d8e04c8795f2c45ec731a.jpg59cbd51caa77b_fossilfromtheWealClay(2).thumb.jpg.7b1a3970707964199984154f143b9ce2.jpg

 

The quarry cuts through a section of the Wealden group, specifically the Weald Clay. The clay was deposited in a lake and floodplain environment during the Barremian stage of the Cretaceous period about 129-128 million years ago.

 

Regards.....D&E&i

The only certainty with fossil hunting is the uncertainty.

https://lnk.bio/Darren.Withers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There might be some resemblance to a cockroach forewing (tegmen).  You should check against photos or literature available online to see what you think, though.

 

Don

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Arizona Chris said:

Really?  or do you mean 3mm?

It's quite a struggle for an exact measurement @Arizona Chris but certainly under a 1mm. Good point though I understand your thinking, I should have been more specific in my description. I'll amend it now.

Regards.....D&E&i

The only certainty with fossil hunting is the uncertainty.

https://lnk.bio/Darren.Withers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it's only 0.3mm, how did you photograph it, or even find it in the first place?

0.3mm in that first photo would be about 1 pixel in size, judging by the ruler.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Wrangellian said:

If it's only 0.3mm, how did you photograph it, or even find it in the first place?

0.3mm in that first photo would be about 1 pixel in size, judging by the ruler.

If you are asking out of interest, then firstly I used a x12 hand loop to locate it. Then photoed it using the macro microscope setting on a Olympus TG-4.

Regards.....D&E&i

The only certainty with fossil hunting is the uncertainty.

https://lnk.bio/Darren.Withers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

The insect is has now been confirmed as cockroach. See the cockroach chapter in English Wealden fossils (p.177, text-fig. 14.2B) for a good comparison.  It would be difficult to put an exact species on it as not all the cockroaches have been described, and apparently need the complete wing.

Regards.....D&E&i

The only certainty with fossil hunting is the uncertainty.

https://lnk.bio/Darren.Withers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would be cool to see it circled in the first photo. Congrats on finding and identifying such a small specimen!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Plax said:

It would be cool to see it circled in the first photo. Congrats on finding and identifying such a small specimen!

 

Thank you @Plax ill pin point another photo to show this.

Regards.....D&E&i

The only certainty with fossil hunting is the uncertainty.

https://lnk.bio/Darren.Withers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...