Napoleon North Posted October 9, 2017 Share Posted October 9, 2017 Hi It is footprint fossil? Age:Triassic Location:Poland Size: near 3 mm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fossildude19 Posted October 9, 2017 Share Posted October 9, 2017 I don't think so. First, it's awfully small. Second, it doesn't really have any footprint shape to id. I'd vote for sedimentary feature. Tim - VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER VFOTM --- APRIL - 2015 __________________________________________________ "In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks." John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~ ><))))( *> About Me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plax Posted October 9, 2017 Share Posted October 9, 2017 perhaps an invertebrate trail? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fifbrindacier Posted October 9, 2017 Share Posted October 9, 2017 I agree with Plax. "On ne voit bien que par le coeur, l'essentiel est invisible pour les yeux." (Antoine de Saint-Exupéry) "We only well see with the heart, the essential is invisible for the eyes." In memory of Doren Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arizona Chris Posted October 9, 2017 Share Posted October 9, 2017 Eroding limestone? I dont see any footprints. What kind of rock is this? Shales can have prints in them. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Arizona Chris Paleo Web Site: http://schursastrophotography.com/fossiladventures.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now