Haravex Posted October 9, 2017 Share Posted October 9, 2017 I have some new finds these I hope maybe from pterosaur as seems to have characteristics. However problem is I only have phone camera and cannot edit to make smaller so pictures will only come very slowly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fifbrindacier Posted October 9, 2017 Share Posted October 9, 2017 I wait for the other photos with impatience. "On ne voit bien que par le coeur, l'essentiel est invisible pour les yeux." (Antoine de Saint-Exupéry) "We only well see with the heart, the essential is invisible for the eyes." In memory of Doren Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Haravex Posted October 9, 2017 Author Share Posted October 9, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LordTrilobite Posted October 9, 2017 Share Posted October 9, 2017 Hard to tell what kind of bones these are exactly, since they are so fragmentary. But, yeah the thin bone wall does seem to indicate that these could be Pterosaur bones. Olof Moleman AKA Lord Trilobite Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Troodon Posted October 9, 2017 Share Posted October 9, 2017 Could be pterosaur being so thin but let's not forget bird. To fragmentary to say for sure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Haravex Posted October 9, 2017 Author Share Posted October 9, 2017 Ah I bought hoping maybe could be partial beak and has lot of sutures on the inside. And also has the shape of it but photo does not show this very well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Haravex Posted October 9, 2017 Author Share Posted October 9, 2017 This is a tooth which has caught my eye as does not look like regular kem kem material Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Haravex Posted October 9, 2017 Author Share Posted October 9, 2017 I forget root is also important for diagnosis. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Troodon Posted October 9, 2017 Share Posted October 9, 2017 Nice tooth. Possible croc. the posterior teeth of Hamadasuchus rebouli take that form and are serrated. One your second bone it's possible it could be a beak but again to fragmentary to say for sure. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Haravex Posted October 9, 2017 Author Share Posted October 9, 2017 Thank you for your help I will take better photo of possible pterosaur beak when I get home for maybe possible identification but will also take to museum maybe they can help and again thank you everything else I know what is and have got today. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ludwigia Posted October 9, 2017 Share Posted October 9, 2017 I like the 2 teeth in the middle on the left, but I've forgotten what they are called? Greetings from the Lake of Constance. Roger http://www.steinkern.de/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sseth Posted October 9, 2017 Share Posted October 9, 2017 11 minutes ago, Ludwigia said: I like the 2 teeth in the middle on the left, but I've forgotten what they are called? They re rostral spines form a sawfish called Onchopristis. _____________________________________ Seth www.fossilshack.com www.americanfossil.com www.fishdig.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ludwigia Posted October 9, 2017 Share Posted October 9, 2017 2 minutes ago, sseth said: They re rostral spines form a sawfish called Onchopristis. That's it! Thanks! Greetings from the Lake of Constance. Roger http://www.steinkern.de/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LordTrilobite Posted October 10, 2017 Share Posted October 10, 2017 And the tooth on the bottom left looks like it could be Abelisaurid. The tooth on the top right is from a lungfish. 1 Olof Moleman AKA Lord Trilobite Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jesuslover340 Posted October 10, 2017 Share Posted October 10, 2017 20 hours ago, Troodon said: Nice tooth. Possible croc. the posterior teeth of Hamadasuchus rebouli take that form and are serrated. One your second bone it's possible it could be a beak but again to fragmentary to say for sure. I'd second Hamadasuchus "Let us therefore follow after the things which make for peace, and things wherewith one may edify another."-Romans 14:19 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Haravex Posted October 10, 2017 Author Share Posted October 10, 2017 Thank you @LordTrilobite I did however know these the top left both are from sauropod (possibly rebbachisaurus sp) and bottom right is pterosaur (s.morocanis) I have a few other finds from trip out to kem kem and will post later another abelisaurus indet and some fish verts. However when we stoped to let motorbike cool my friend was having a look for meteorites and such I found a ammonite impression and wondered if anyone might be able to I.d. it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Haravex Posted October 13, 2017 Author Share Posted October 13, 2017 Two I have yet to buy but interested in and wanted second opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Haravex Posted October 13, 2017 Author Share Posted October 13, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Haravex Posted October 13, 2017 Author Share Posted October 13, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LordTrilobite Posted October 13, 2017 Share Posted October 13, 2017 That long pointy one looks like it could be a Pterosaur beak. Olof Moleman AKA Lord Trilobite Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Haravex Posted October 13, 2017 Author Share Posted October 13, 2017 These are new purchases. Comparing with work I have seen published on spinosaurus comparisons I feel safe to I.d them as toe claws and yes they are tiny with the largest one measuring 11.6mm and 8.5mm. However don't feel confident enough to place an id on the phalange and claw both of which are associated I believe (At least they where found within 6 inches of each other.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FossilDAWG Posted October 13, 2017 Share Posted October 13, 2017 Considering how evolute the specimen is, and the ornament, it is likely a lytocerid ammonite. Gaudryceras or something similar is a strong possibility. Don 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michele 1937 Posted October 13, 2017 Share Posted October 13, 2017 imprint of Clymenia ammonites Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jpc Posted October 13, 2017 Share Posted October 13, 2017 the claws look crocodilian to me. Flat and not much curvature. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FossilDAWG Posted October 13, 2017 Share Posted October 13, 2017 I believe Clymenia is a Devonian ammonoid. Lots of Devonian in Morocco of course but no spinosaurids or pterosaurs in the Devonian. If it is a Clymenia impression it would seem to be far out of place. Don Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now