Jump to content

How common planispiral Paleozoic Monoplacophorans?


Arizona Chris

Recommended Posts

Were finding dozens of what we believe to be some small flat coiled monoplacophorans in some Permian sediments.  The spirals dont touch and sometimes the openings are not round.  I was surprised to find that other than the normal cap shaped ones we find a lot of, the were also many with half a dozen coils.  Ever found this type?  Id be interested to see if what we  have is similar.  

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Arizona Chris

Paleo Web Site:  http://schursastrophotography.com/fossiladventures.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Arizona Chris said:

Were finding dozens of what we believe to be some small flat coiled monoplacophorans in some Permian sediments.  The spirals dont touch and sometimes the openings are not round.  I was surprised to find that other than the normal cap shaped ones we find a lot of, the were also many with half a dozen coils.  Ever found this type?  Id be interested to see if what we  have is similar.  

Got any pictures?

Darwin said: " Man sprang from monkeys."

Will Rogers said: " Some of them didn't spring far enough."

 

My Fossil collection - My Mineral collection

My favorite thread on TFF.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok, here is a shot at 20x.  They are flat on both sides, some of them are round tubes.  Im thinking either archeogastropod or monoplacophoran.  

spirals1-1290.thumb.jpg.817d60c65d5a15ae48bf678c5ccf103d.jpg

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Arizona Chris

Paleo Web Site:  http://schursastrophotography.com/fossiladventures.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Could they be baby/partial Straparollus sp. coiled gastropods as pictured in the Winter's reference?

My goal is to leave no stone or fossil unturned.   

See my Arizona Paleontology Guide    link  The best single resource for Arizona paleontology anywhere.       

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

I would lean more towards the archaeogastropoda. I have many monoplacophorans and couple different species at that, and the picture looks nothing like what I've got. Here's a coiled one I have partially prepped below for reference.

20190401_103715-1-1.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/4/2019 at 8:45 AM, Jackson g said:

I would lean more towards the archaeogastropoda. I have many monoplacophorans and couple different species at that, and the picture looks nothing like what I've got. Here's a coiled one I have partially prepped below for reference.

20190401_103715-1-1.jpg

+1

ashcraft, brent allen

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They look much more like Straparollus which S. S. Winters has found in the Permian Fort Apache Limestone where Cris found his.

 

See Straparollus shells 3a-3c from:

Winters, S.S. (1963). Supai Formation (Permian) of Eastern Arizona. Geological Society of America Memoir, 89, 99 p

3D7DB0AC-8301-4570-8CC5-B22F25B4F933.jpeg

  • I found this Informative 1

My goal is to leave no stone or fossil unturned.   

See my Arizona Paleontology Guide    link  The best single resource for Arizona paleontology anywhere.       

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Straparollus and similar genera are not monoplacophorans, but they are gastropods with a very low, almost planispiral, form. They are very common in some Carboniferous and Permian formations.

 

Also, IMHO the image Kackson G shared is the "platycerid" Orthonychia, again not a monoplacophoran.

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agreed with @DPS Ammonite. Not sure I quite agree these are gastropods yet though. Either or they are mollusks I know. I've been told by some in person they are gastropods, and by others they are monoplacophorans. Im no paleontologist though, and much too busy with working right now on the road to be able to check anything at home. I can say with 100% certainty though, that all the gastropod fossils (I can identify) collected in the same area are much different looking than these. Much more like your common snail shell. When I'm back home I'll take them to a friend at MU to checkout.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/5/2019 at 1:39 PM, DPS Ammonite said:

They look much more like Straparollus which S. S. Winters has found in the Permian Fort Apache Limestone where Cris found his.

 

See Straparollus shells 3a-3c from:

Winters, S.S. (1963). Supai Formation (Permian) of Eastern Arizona. Geological Society of America Memoir, 89, 99 p

3D7DB0AC-8301-4570-8CC5-B22F25B4F933.jpeg

I should have pointed out that above post was referring to the fossils that Arizona Chris posted.

My goal is to leave no stone or fossil unturned.   

See my Arizona Paleontology Guide    link  The best single resource for Arizona paleontology anywhere.       

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
On 4/5/2019 at 8:38 PM, erose said:

Also, IMHO the image Kackson G shared is the "platycerid" Orthonychia, again not a monoplacophoran

You were correct on the ID on this one, good call and thank you. I passed on the info you said as well. I just got some of my specimens and a letter back in the mail. I sent some coiled, some smooth ovaled shaped cones, and some straight almost spike coned looking ones. His opinion was most were gastropods, and only a couple were true placos. Great to learn some local info. :dinosmile:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...