Jump to content

TqB

Recommended Posts

Three productids with most of their spines intact, showing that they looked like hedgehogs. I haven't identified them further largely because I can't see the shells properly.

 

(Edit: likely to be Echinoconchus or similar echinoconchid - see below)

 

These are from a Brigantian (Mississippian) mudstone in NE England, Co.Durham.

 

1) About 6cm across

IMG_2730.thumb.jpg.63204f0da1ead82ac2a07ef6b5a99812.jpgIMG_2731.thumb.jpg.9174ea99e3f15d67f6a34f40a91f427b.jpg

 

 

2) Interior brachial valve showing spines projecting around the edge from behind. About 3cm across.

IMG_2732.thumb.jpg.e36bfdb9b8a22f33a9b0a9da77fba4a3.jpgIMG_2734.thumb.jpg.3c80b7c9e6df652e5deb98f4a68a346c.jpg

 

3) about 4cm across:

IMG_2735.thumb.jpg.fe8ea9952a04cfb138d0cf7d8fa61739.jpgIMG_2736.thumb.jpg.1244137a58d0a14ef36e43522933e029.jpg

Tarquin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How wonderful. I must get some spiny productids. 

And beautiful photographs too.

(ahem) :headscratch:

Life's Good!

Tortoise Friend.

MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png.a47e14d65deb3f8b242019b3a81d8160-1.png.60b8b8c07f6fa194511f8b7cfb7cc190.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

These are incredible, Tarquin! 

Very rarely see spines on brachiopods from areas I've collected at. 

Thanks for posting these - a treat to see them. 

 

    Tim    -  VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER

   MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png      PaleoPartner.png.30c01982e09b0cc0b7d9d6a7a21f56c6.png.a600039856933851eeea617ca3f2d15f.png     Postmaster1.jpg.900efa599049929531fa81981f028e24.jpg    VFOTM.png.f1b09c78bf88298b009b0da14ef44cf0.png  VFOTM  --- APRIL - 2015  

__________________________________________________
"In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks."

John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~   ><))))( *>  About Me      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very nice find.... looks to be an Echinoconchus, they are very common in the upper Mississippian in eastern north America.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks all for the kind comments!

 

@Archimedes Thanks, Echinoconchus looks very likely -  I also had Pustula as a possibility which may be a synonym if @doushantuo's Gobbett reference is current.

 

Ben, great outtakes, I'll try to find the papers. I guess those stunners in the Grant plate are silicified? 

Tarquin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tarq,see the legend to figure one:D

If ayone has either Orrhage(Zoomorph./1973) or Carsten Lueter 's 2000 Anat. Anz. article ,let me know

the ontogeny and histology of brach spines(setae/chaetae) both get a thorough treatment in those

 

 

tarfirstPage-S0022336000027062a.jpg

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, doushantuo said:

Tarq,see the legend to figure one:D

If ayone has either Orrhage(Zoomorph./1973) or Carsten Lueter 's 2000 Anat. Anz. article ,let me know

the ontogeny and histology of brach spines(setae/chaetae) both get a thorough treatment in those

 

 

tarfirstPage-S0022336000027062a.jpg

 

 

Love the info you provide. But had to especially thank you for the bluebird pictures. My wife and I love bluebirds and love to learn about them! Will have to research this a little more as I had never heard of this.

 

Mike

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Minn,the reason for those in my signature are very plain & simple: i've been reading a lot about the comparative morphology of bird skulls and vertebrate cranial kinesis 

in general,and the more extravagant examples always draw my attention.

Papers on trochilid functional morphology(--->>>"what makes hummingbirds tick") are rare

Edit: From Vellutini et al.,2016

fitarqbracrstPage-S0022336000027062a.jpg

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, minnbuckeye said:

thank you for the bluebird pictures. My wife and I love bluebirds and love to learn about them!

It is a humming bird, not a blue bird.

Darwin said: " Man sprang from monkeys."

Will Rogers said: " Some of them didn't spring far enough."

 

My Fossil collection - My Mineral collection

My favorite thread on TFF.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sometimes one types and does NOT look at what one composes. Here is a prime example where proof reading would have caught my mistake. I was out cleaning out my bluebird's houses yesterday and without thinking, wrote bluebird instead of hummingbird. Yes we prefer hummingbirds to bluebirds. Thanks for pointing out the mistake!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wonderful photos Tarquin, we both have the same specimens so now I know what to call mine. Hope to get back to sorting more of my NE finds over winter.

Never ask a starfish for directions

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Brittle Star said:

Wonderful photos Tarquin, we both have the same specimens so now I know what to call mine. Hope to get back to sorting more of my NE finds over winter.

 

Thanks, I remember you had some. I look forward to seeing more!

Tarquin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for showing us Tarquin some great detail shown on the spiny brachiopods . Very crisp with good contrast, you have a good lens there.  I have never seen this brachiopod before it's really strange but beautiful.

 Also @doushantuo post are very interesting too. 

 

Cheers Bobby 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...