U-ri-za-a Posted November 12, 2017 Share Posted November 12, 2017 Hi everyone, I made a trip in the Judean Mountains around the city of Ramallah yesterday. It was there that I found this specimen. The scale provide is in cm: the specimen is about 6 cm long, that is about 2.5 inches. I found it on a high hill at an altitude of about 800 m (2600), on the ground among countless rock fragments. The hill was subject to severe erosion and bedrock was visible all over with patches of earth and smaller rocks in between. The rock seemed to be limestone, with many features that I as a novice can only describe in the most casual terms: many spherical holes turtle shell pattern on the surface of rock large and small pebbles embedded in the rock, apparently slightly more resistant to erosion I would like to ask you the identity ofthis specimen, and would also be interested to read tips on how to identify promising spots to find more fossils based on altitude, surrounding rock, layers... Thank you for your time! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tidgy's Dad Posted November 12, 2017 Share Posted November 12, 2017 Looks like the valve of a bivalve to me. Something along the lines of Trigonia, perhaps? But that's really a wild guess. 2 Life's Good! Tortoise Friend. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miocene_Mason Posted November 12, 2017 Share Posted November 12, 2017 Does look to be the steinkern (internal mold) of a bivalve or maybe brachiopod. Do you know the age of the specimen? This can be ascertained by looking at a geological map of your area. 1 “...whilst this planet has gone cycling on according to the fixed law of gravity, from so simple a beginning endless forms most beautiful and most wonderful have been and are being evolved.” ~ Charles Darwin Happy hunting, Mason Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RJB Posted November 12, 2017 Share Posted November 12, 2017 Im with these guys. looks more clamish than ammo. RB 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
U-ri-za-a Posted November 12, 2017 Author Share Posted November 12, 2017 (edited) Thanks for your input! I'm psyched. I just discovered how a geological map works... The Israel Geology Institute has 1:50000 maps of the whole place available. I'm on this one: Ramallah (lithology attached). Looks like the fossil is from the Kefira formation of the middle Albian but it may have come down from the hilltop which represents the Giv'at Yearim formation from ... the somewhat later Albian On a sidenote, contrary to the Ramallah map, the Jerusalem map has a special icon for fossils in its lithology profile! That's just making it too easy! Jerusalem is just a dozen km south, so am I guessing correctly that those layers would be of interest to me here as well? Especially since even the formation names are the same... (Second pic labeled J for Jerusalem - spirals represent fossils in case the symbol isn't universal). Edited November 12, 2017 by U-ri-za-a correct mistaken formation Soreq -> Giv'at Yearim Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coled18 Posted November 12, 2017 Share Posted November 12, 2017 As @Tidgy's Dad suggested, Trigonia seems like a good guess. This is a Trigonia Emoryi for reference from the Sam Noble Museum in Oklahoma. This Trigonia specimen came from the lower Cretaceous, placing it in the same timeframe as yours. 2 CD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
U-ri-za-a Posted November 13, 2017 Author Share Posted November 13, 2017 Thanks, I'm convinced! Final question: if the specimen is a steinkern, does that mean that the non-shell side of the fossil (pictured above) is an imprint of the fleshy bits of the animal? The non-shell side does have a large indent on one side, might that be the space where the dentition was? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coled18 Posted November 14, 2017 Share Posted November 14, 2017 Chances are, the soft flesh would have rotted out during the fossilization process. I think the non-shell side is much more likely to be an imprint of the sediment that replaced the flesh right after the animal died. It is a cool find, regardless! CD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
abyssunder Posted November 14, 2017 Share Posted November 14, 2017 Looks like Trigonia, I agree. I propose Pterotrigonia (Scabrotrigonia) scabra (LAMARCK, 1819) for a tentative ID. excerpt from El-Hedeny, M. M. 2006. Pterotrigonia (Scabrotrigonia) scabra (Lamarck, 1819), a polymorphic bivalve from the Upper Cretaceous (Coniacian-Santonian) of Egypt. Revue de Paléobiologie, 25(2): 709-722. " We are not separate and independent entities, but like links in a chain, and we could not by any means be what we are without those who went before us and showed us the way. " Thomas Mann My Library Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now