Crazyhen Posted November 30, 2017 Share Posted November 30, 2017 Hi, guys, this frog fossil was said to be collected from Liaoning, China. It has been repaired as the original plate is broken into several pieces. But do you think it is a genuine one? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
piranha Posted November 30, 2017 Share Posted November 30, 2017 Yes, authentic. Here is the paper that first described it: Wang, Y., & Gao, K. (1999) Earliest Asian discoglossid frog from western Liaoning. Chinese Science Bulletin, 44(7):636-642 PDF LINK Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oilshale Posted November 30, 2017 Share Posted November 30, 2017 Authentic. Name is not Callobatrachus sanyanensis anymore; new name is Liaobatrachus beipiaoensis (Gao and Wang, 2001). Please check: L, Rocˇek Z, Wang Y, Jones MEH (2013) Anurans from the Lower Cretaceous Jehol Group of Western Liaoning, China. PLoS ONE 8(7): e69723. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0069723. You can download the paper here: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0069723 Have fun Thomas 1 Be not ashamed of mistakes and thus make them crimes (Confucius, 551 BC - 479 BC). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Andy- Posted November 30, 2017 Share Posted November 30, 2017 Looks real to me. Looking forward to meeting my fellow Singaporean collectors! Do PM me if you are a Singaporean, or an overseas fossil-collector coming here for a holiday! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
piranha Posted February 1, 2018 Share Posted February 1, 2018 On 11/29/2017 at 10:33 PM, oilshale said: ...Name is not Callobatrachus sanyanensis anymore; new name is Liaobatrachus beipiaoensis (Gao and Wang, 2001). (2013) Anurans from the Lower Cretaceous Jehol Group of Western Liaoning, China. PLoS ONE 8(7): e69723. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0069723. You can download the paper here: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0069723 The other frog thread by Crazyhen reminded me of this. Evidently Callobatrachus sanyanensis still remains vaild: text from: Gao, K.Q., & Chen, J. (2017) A new crown-group frog (Amphibia: Anura) from the Early Cretaceous of northeastern Inner Mongolia, China. American Museum Novitates, (3876):1-39 PDF LINK "Another nominal taxon (Liaobatrachus Ji and Ji, 1998) from the Yixian Formation is here treated as a nomen dubium (but see Dоng et al., 2013), because the poorly preserved holotype specimen (GMV 2126) provides insufficient information to permit recognition of this as a distinct species. Dоng et al. (2013) provided a taxonomic revision of the Jehol fossil frogs, in which the three taxa (Callobatrachus, Mesophryne, and Yizhoubatrachus) were grouped collectively in a single genus and were synonymized with Liaobatrachus. This revision, however, remains contentious and is not supported by a recent phylogenetic analysis (Chen et al., 2016). Here we treat the three Jehol frogs as independent taxa and keep their original names." 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now