Jump to content

Cuban Megalodon Shape


meg.cu

Recommended Posts

Hi, I have this Megalodon tooth from Cuba and the shape is a little different than I've ever seen. It's a lower tooth at 5.24", can anyone give me insight on the shape of this tooth.

 

daggerftd17.jpeg

daggerbkd17.jpeg

 "Message me for info on Fossil Collecting in Cuba. " 

cuba1 029.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks superficially a bit like Carcharocles** subauriculatus*,but the sharks experts will kill me for that remark .

Don't know the size limits for the dentition of that species,though.

*I'm not exactly renowned for shark tooth determinations:P

**(Otodus?fide Diedrich,2013)

  • I found this Informative 1

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmm, if the shape bothers you that much, you can always send it to me.

Out of sight, out of mind.

Dorensigbadges.JPG       

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, doushantuo said:

Looks superficially a bit like Carcharocles** subauriculatus*,but the sharks experts will kill me for that remark .

Don't know the size limits for the dentition of that species,though.

*I'm not exactly renowned for shark tooth determinations:P

**(Otodus?fide Diedrich,2013)

Subauriculatus is a shifty species, but I do agree it’s a ancestor of the meg, maybe chubutensis. With the chronos it’s hard to get an exact label.

“...whilst this planet has gone cycling on according to the fixed law of gravity, from so simple a beginning endless forms most beautiful and most wonderful have been and are being evolved.” ~ Charles Darwin

Happy hunting,

Mason

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, meg.cu said:

Isn't this tooth to big to be chubutensis, it measures around the 5.5" mark?

 

Either way, it is an absolutely gorgeous :meg:specimen. DAAAYYYUUUUMMM!!!!! :fistbump:

 

:blink: :wub:  :faint:

 

@Fossil-Hound Too bad they don't have these in Utah. :P

Don't know much about history

Don't know much biology

Don't know much about science books.........

Sam Cooke - (What A) Wonderful World

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, SailingAlongToo said:

 

Either way, it is an absolutely gorgeous :meg:specimen. DAAAYYYUUUUMMM!!!!! :fistbump:

 

:blink: :wub:  :faint:

 

@Fossil-Hound Too bad they don't have these in Utah. :P

@SailingAlongToo I know right! That is one gorgeous tooth and makes me want to fly out to VA/Carolinas for some Meg hunting! My mother just asked me what I wanted for Christmas. I was torn between a prime Ecphora and a 3.5 inch Meg. I'm going with the 3.5 inch Meg so I can finish an evolutionary plaque. I only need a Meg and an Auriculatus to complete the display! Have a O. obliquus, C. angustiden, and C. chubutensis. I have another $50 from my grandmother so I'll probably use that for the C. auriculatus and complete the plaque! Christmas  going to be so good this year! :wub:

Do or do not. There is no try. - Yoda

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would like to see what the shark tooth experts have to say....

@MarcoSr, @siteseer, @sixgill pete, @Al Dente

 

        ?

Darwin said: " Man sprang from monkeys."

Will Rogers said: " Some of them didn't spring far enough."

 

My Fossil collection - My Mineral collection

My favorite thread on TFF.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with @ynot that the tooth is likely a lower anterior, possibly the center most tooth on the left or right side of the lower jaw. I do not agree that the tooth might be C. subauriculatus or C. chubutensis. I am confident that it is C. megalodon. 

  • I found this Informative 5

Bulldozers and dirt Bulldozers and dirt
behind the trailer, my desert
Them red clay piles are heaven on earth
I get my rocks off, bulldozers and dirt

Patterson Hood; Drive-By Truckers

 

image.png.0c956e87cee523facebb6947cb34e842.png May 2016  MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png.a47e14d65deb3f8b242019b3a81d8160.png.b42a25e3438348310ba19ce6852f50c1.png May 2012 IPFOTM5.png.fb4f2a268e315c58c5980ed865b39e1f.png.1721b8912c45105152ac70b0ae8303c3.png.2b6263683ee32421d97e7fa481bd418a.pngAug 2013, May 2016, Apr 2020 VFOTM.png.f1b09c78bf88298b009b0da14ef44cf0.png.af5065d0585e85f4accd8b291bf0cc2e.png.72a83362710033c9bdc8510be7454b66.png.9171036128e7f95de57b6a0f03c491da.png Oct 2022

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Truthfully I'm not seeing anything unusual about the shape of this meg.  Meg teeth sometimes because of jaw crowding are a little mesiodistally compressed.  Agree that the tooth is a lower anterior tooth.  Sometimes big megs have a ruffled/wavy bulge in the crown by the root that might look like a cusplet.  This could be caused by mesiodistal tooth compression (If the tooth was just a little wider it wouldn't have this feature.).  See the 5.63 " meg from Virginia below:

 

image.png.19b41569f4c53b095e2b3c66ca2f4f27.png

 

Marco Sr.

  • I found this Informative 3

"Any day that you can fossil hunt is a great day."

My family fossil website     Some Of My Shark, Ray, Fish And Other Micros     My Extant Shark Jaw Collection

image.png.9a941d70fb26446297dbc9dae7bae7ed.png image.png.41c8380882dac648c6131b5bc1377249.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/15/2017 at 6:53 PM, sixgill pete said:

I agree with @ynot that the tooth is likely a lower anterior, possibly the center most tooth on the left or right side of the lower jaw. I do not agree that the tooth might be C. subauriculatus or C. chubutensis. I am confident that it is C. megalodon. 

 

Yes, I agree.  It looks like either a first or second lower anterior of C. megalodon.  Maybe what makes it look weird is that the root is a little abraded on the lobes?

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...