Jump to content

Just a quickie


Dewbunny

Recommended Posts

Found these two today whilst knocking around some dirt. Not sure if they are fossil or not. Down here we have a lot of shells and a lot of "reworked" dirt and sand,so to speak. Which means I'm not sure if they originated where I found them or if they were moved there by construction and/or backfill.

Any input is welcome.

 

 

20171219_161426.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First looks like Bursidae (Bufonaria ?).

 

Second one perhaps Turritellidae.

 

Coco

  • I found this Informative 1

----------------------
OUTIL POUR MESURER VOS FOSSILES : ici

Ma bibliothèque PDF 1 (Poissons et sélaciens récents & fossiles) : ici
Ma bibliothèque PDF 2 (Animaux vivants - sans poissons ni sélaciens) : ici
Mâchoires sélaciennes récentes : ici
Hétérodontiques et sélaciens : ici
Oeufs sélaciens récents : ici
Otolithes de poissons récents ! ici

Un Greg...

Badges-IPFOTH.jpg.f4a8635cda47a3cc506743a8aabce700.jpg Badges-MOTM.jpg.461001e1a9db5dc29ca1c07a041a1a86.jpg

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe Marsupina bufo and Turritella acropora?  Possible recent but maybe Middle Pleistocene Bermont Formation.  Regardless, the frog shell is a nice find.

 

Mike

  • I found this Informative 1

"A problem solved is a problem caused"--Karl Pilkington

"I was dead for millions of years before I was born and it never inconvenienced me a bit." -- Mark Twain

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the help. The majority of my finds are modern animals and shells but sometimes it's hard for me to tell. What I look for is enamel? If it still has some enamel usually file it under extant. No enamel goes to the fossil box for possible ID. 

 

Here's a massive horse conch I found recently. It's about 18 inches long. Looks fossil but not.

 

20171220_143048.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Dewbunny said:

What I look for is enamel? If it still has some enamel usually file it under extant. No enamel goes to the fossil box for possible ID.

Only teeth have enamel. The shells are made of a different material, Nacre.

Darwin said: " Man sprang from monkeys."

Will Rogers said: " Some of them didn't spring far enough."

 

My Fossil collection - My Mineral collection

My favorite thread on TFF.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That looks like our Florida Horse Conch now Triplofusus papillosus (formerly Pleuroploca gigantea, a name I liked much better). These things can reach 2 feet long!

 

 

Cheers.

 

-Ken

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@ynot my apologies, I thought nacre was mother of pearl and not present in our Florida conchs, thought they were considered porcellaneous hence why I used the term 'enamel'. But then again I really have no idea what I'm talking about anyhow.

 

@digit Yep it is Triplofusus papillosus, it was a awesome find for me. I don't see the really big conchs often around here.

Here's another lucky strike.

A Queen Helmut Conch. It's 9 inches long and as big around as a dinner plate.

20171220_143104.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Dewbunny said:

I thought nacre was mother of pearl

You are correct about this, I used the wrong word:blush: (can't think of the right one:headscratch:[ calcium carbonate]). But it is not enamel either way.

Darwin said: " Man sprang from monkeys."

Will Rogers said: " Some of them didn't spring far enough."

 

My Fossil collection - My Mineral collection

My favorite thread on TFF.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...