Jump to content

Somerset ammonites, with one two big surprises


Aurelius

Recommended Posts

I went on a jaunt to Somerset yesterday, for a hunt around in the Beacon Limestone. These rocks are Toarcian in age (~174-182m years old). I found many of the usual ammonites, but also a couple of big surprises.

 

First, the usual finds.

 

These harpoceras ammonites are often very well preserved, and usually display their sutures (you'd be lucky to find one with much shell on it). It has iron deposits on it, but a bit of time in the blasting cabinet and it'll be a uniform grey (which is nicer than it sounds).

 

PCB_1443.thumb.jpg.522870f1f6ffc934e4a30d051498e560.jpg

 

Here's another harpoceras, with a small oyster attached. This will take a bit of prep to remove the plug. Often the centres aren't complete.

 

PCB_1453.thumb.jpg.58a9799553d9a649a07c261dafcd9e75.jpg

 

These large examples of dactyloceras are quite common in one layer, but the larger ones almost never seem to be complete to the very centre.

 

PCB_1456.thumb.jpg.5a0b07b6cea73db868fc5528558d60c0.jpg

 

I sometimes pick up broken examples, because they often break along the suture lines. This one might look quite decent when I pen it and blast away the orange deposits.

 

PCB_1462.thumb.jpg.2e3e98fbf96e80803436df249dba77b0.jpg

 

These jumbled up pieces of matrix are fairly common, and contain lots of ammonites. I've also very occasionally found shark fin spine fragments in them, the only vertebrate remains I have ever found in these rocks.

 

PCB_1466.thumb.jpg.15f33618526516423169c46aa65ebdc1.jpg

 

When I spotted this, I wondered if it might be a large teuthid phragmocone, which you do (rarely) find, but it isn't. I wonder if it might be a lobster burrow?

 

P_PC3376.thumb.jpg.8f89be64f39ad916dbe934ce9d199c53.jpg

 

A small nautilus which has had a bit of a knock.

 

PCB_1468.thumb.jpg.13f154abaadf2a5432b2d964c26626b9.jpg

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's the surprise part. I saw a large rock poking out of the ground, with what appeared to be the keel of an ammonite. I knew it couldn't be, because it was too big, but I turned it over anyway, out of curiosity. It was this:

 

P_PC3362.thumb.jpg.429a071e71f808d1dc90076c4515f2fe.jpg

 

This is one serious ammonite! In addition, it's not an ammonite that I should have found in Toarcian rocks. I'm not an expert, but I thought it was probably coroniceras, an ammonite commonly found at Lyme Regis. However, coroniceras is a Sinemurian ammonite, that lived 8+ million years before these rocks were deposited. You don't find ammonites this big in these rocks (or at least, I never have!).

 

By this stage, I imagined that I must be hallucinating, so imagine my shock when I turned over a rock a few feet away, and found this.

 

P_PC3366.thumb.jpg.cc45f73a66d3207119cf7437599debab.jpg

 

So that's two of them, in the middle of nowhere, in an area packed with toarcian (and to a much lesser extent, Pliensbachian) fossils.

 

Both of them are very worn, although there's evidence of shell material retreating back into the rock, so I can probably prep from the other side, and am hopeful for a good result.


These don't appear to be from Lyme (wrong type of rock). In fact, in terms of appearance and preservation, these do look rather like the local rock, once it's been buried for a decade or three. The worn look and patchy shell preservation remind me of the reworked fossils you often find in this formation (it's common to find earlier fossils in later layers, which have been heavily worn and then re-deposited). Could these be reworked from an earlier layer, or are they more likely fossils which have been dumped here for reasons unknown?

 

Close-up of the worn shell:

 

P_PC3372.thumb.jpg.c610ac93eec93b968213e5eb8e55e28c.jpg

 

This is the reverse of one of the blocks, to show the type of rock:

 

P_PC3365.thumb.jpg.5520028ee8c715f2c84a86a186530123.jpg

 

Any thoughts would be very welcome! 

 

 

P_PC3368.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice finds! That is a biggin'! Congratulations. 

~Charlie~

"There are those that look at things the way they are, and ask why.....i dream of things that never were, and ask why not?" ~RFK
->Get your Mosasaur print
->How to spot a fake Trilobite
->How to identify a CONCRETION from a DINOSAUR EGG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All of them look nice, but even the last 2 look better preserved than almost anything found around here in North Texas.

Nice finds. Do you keep all that you find?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’ve got little to no knowledge on these areas, but they are some nice Ammos:dinothumb:

maybe somone like @JohnBrewer would I know more.

“...whilst this planet has gone cycling on according to the fixed law of gravity, from so simple a beginning endless forms most beautiful and most wonderful have been and are being evolved.” ~ Charles Darwin

Happy hunting,

Mason

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you for the kind comments. 

 

2 hours ago, Heteromorph said:

Beautiful peices! What kind of lighting did you use for the pictures? Sunlight or good artificial light? 

 

I used the last dregs of indirect sunlight before the sun disappeared over the horizon! I had to use quite high ISO on some.

 

1 hour ago, KimTexan said:

All of them look nice, but even the last 2 look better preserved than almost anything found around here in North Texas.

Nice finds. Do you keep all that you find?

 

I do keep everything at present, but I will be selling some soon, and also possibly giving some away.

 

Just in case anybody's interested, here are some prepped examples, to show how they come up.

 

P_PC3380.thumb.jpg.8c69c423d6dea64dfa516f417cf997cb.jpg

 

P_PC3390.thumb.jpg.a860d6fdc22277f2202bb34336d00929.jpg

 

P_PC3396.thumb.jpg.be5193a8717a9a7907ed6ffe069a28a1.jpg

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great finds. I love ammonites, they are just really rare here in North Carolina.

Bulldozers and dirt Bulldozers and dirt
behind the trailer, my desert
Them red clay piles are heaven on earth
I get my rocks off, bulldozers and dirt

Patterson Hood; Drive-By Truckers

 

image.png.0c956e87cee523facebb6947cb34e842.png May 2016  MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png.a47e14d65deb3f8b242019b3a81d8160.png.b42a25e3438348310ba19ce6852f50c1.png May 2012 IPFOTM5.png.fb4f2a268e315c58c5980ed865b39e1f.png.1721b8912c45105152ac70b0ae8303c3.png.2b6263683ee32421d97e7fa481bd418a.pngAug 2013, May 2016, Apr 2020 VFOTM.png.f1b09c78bf88298b009b0da14ef44cf0.png.af5065d0585e85f4accd8b291bf0cc2e.png.72a83362710033c9bdc8510be7454b66.png.9171036128e7f95de57b6a0f03c491da.png Oct 2022

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Beautiful prep job!!!  Wow, wow, WOW!!! :drool:

 

I like this one in particular - the suture pattern is so clear!!! 

 

3 hours ago, Aurelius said:

 

P_PC3380.thumb.jpg.8c69c423d6dea64dfa516f417cf997cb.jpg

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@Aurelius First of all, nice finds! Now a question. Is your exposure an outcrop or are you finding these fossils on a field? You mentioned that the out of place rocks were poking out of the ground. My first thought would be that someone deposited these ammonites there a long time ago, but why? They appear to be in quite good condition. Is it possible that there is a hiatus in the area which omits the entire Pliensbachian?

 

Greetings from the Lake of Constance. Roger

http://www.steinkern.de/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Ludwigia said:

@Aurelius First of all, nice finds! Now a question. Is your exposure an outcrop or are you finding these fossils on a field? You mentioned that the out of place rocks were poking out of the ground. My first thought would be that someone deposited these ammonites there a long time ago, but why? They appear to be in quite good condition. Is it possible that there is an anomaly in the area which omits the entire Pliensbachian?

 

Thank you! This location where I found them is soldly toarcian, with upper pliensbachian beneath. They were found in about two feet of mud which covered a vertical section through the formation. They were not in-situ.  But they were found about a foot away from a large cutting through about ten metres of the formation, so it is conceivable that they were disturbed while the cutting was made and deposited there accidentally, as were plenty of other fossils.

 

On the other hand, I can't escape the probability that they were placed there. If I had found just one, I would be more inclined to believe it might be a freak reworking of a sinermurian fossil, but two next to each other seems like far too much of a coincidence, given that I have never found any others. But why someone would ever dump these fossils there - and where they may have originated from - is a mystery to me.

 

I've always wanted to find a nice big coroniceras, and to find two here (if that's what they are) is baffling. I'm hoping they'll prep nicely from the back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Aurelius said:

 

   But they were found about a foot away from a large cutting through about ten metres of the formation, so it is conceivable that they were disturbed while the cutting was made and deposited there accidentally, as were plenty of other fossils.

 

"Plenty of other fossils" from which stage? Sinemurian or Toarcian? Is this location in a quarry?

 

 

Greetings from the Lake of Constance. Roger

http://www.steinkern.de/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Ludwigia said:

"Plenty of other fossils" from which stage? Sinemurian or Toarcian? Is this location in a quarry?

 

All Toarcian, or upper pliensbachian. The location is a farm - the toarcian deposits are just below the surface over an area of many miles, so road cuttings, building work or ploughing will always expose fossils.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Aurelius said:

All Toarcian, or upper pliensbachian. The location is a farm - the toarcian deposits are just below the surface over an area of many miles, so road cuttings, building work or ploughing will always expose fossils.

In that case I'd assume that someone dumped them there a long time ago.

 

Greetings from the Lake of Constance. Roger

http://www.steinkern.de/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very nice finds.  I am interested in how that big one preps out.  Wish I could find large ammonites like that in my area.

Thanks for sharing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/28/2017 at 3:40 PM, Aurelius said:

Thank you for the kind comments. 

 

 

I used the last dregs of indirect sunlight before the sun disappeared over the horizon! I had to use quite high ISO on some.

 

 

I do keep everything at present, but I will be selling some soon, and also possibly giving some away.

 

Just in case anybody's interested, here are some prepped examples, to show how they come up.

 

P_PC3380.thumb.jpg.8c69c423d6dea64dfa516f417cf997cb.jpg

 

P_PC3390.thumb.jpg.a860d6fdc22277f2202bb34336d00929.jpg

 

P_PC3396.thumb.jpg.be5193a8717a9a7907ed6ffe069a28a1.jpg

 

 

 

 

Drool bucket material, folks!

Every single fossil you see is a miracle set in stone, and should be treated as such.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A couple of days ago, I found this on the same site. This certainly originates there, probably from the pliensbachian marlstone (Spinatum zone), but I can't work out the species. I've found these occasionally in field brash, always just the body chambers. 

 

I don't know if this is pertinent in any way, probably not, but I would be interested to know what this is, if anybody knows.

 

Many thanks.

20180101_212354_001 (1).jpg

20180101_220239.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...