Napoleon North Posted December 29, 2017 Share Posted December 29, 2017 Hi Is this mammal coprolite ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rockwood Posted December 29, 2017 Share Posted December 29, 2017 Bat ? What do you think @GeschWhat ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
supertramp Posted December 29, 2017 Share Posted December 29, 2017 I think that Rockwood is right ciao Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Napoleon North Posted December 29, 2017 Author Share Posted December 29, 2017 But this is burmite and there were no bats in the Cretaceous. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doushantuo Posted December 29, 2017 Share Posted December 29, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fifbrindacier Posted December 29, 2017 Share Posted December 29, 2017 Maybe a digestive ball ? "On ne voit bien que par le coeur, l'essentiel est invisible pour les yeux." (Antoine de Saint-Exupéry) "We only well see with the heart, the essential is invisible for the eyes." In memory of Doren Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rockwood Posted December 29, 2017 Share Posted December 29, 2017 1 hour ago, Napoleon North said: But this is burmite and there were no bats in the Cretaceous. Or maybe now there are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miocene_Mason Posted December 29, 2017 Share Posted December 29, 2017 Sorry to muddy the water but I think it’s a poorly preserved fly or insect of some sort, they are kinda ‘furry’ because of all their little follicles. Being no expert I’ll also put forth the idea of a chrysalis or cocoon. “...whilst this planet has gone cycling on according to the fixed law of gravity, from so simple a beginning endless forms most beautiful and most wonderful have been and are being evolved.” ~ Charles Darwin Happy hunting, Mason Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeschWhat Posted December 29, 2017 Share Posted December 29, 2017 It looks very much like a small rodent fecal pellet to me, so mammal would be my best guess as well. I have seen similar in Dominican amber, but am unfamiliar with older Burmese amber. Very interesting! Lori www.areallycrappystory.com/fossils www.facebook.com/fossilpoo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.