Jump to content

Fully rooted pterosaur tooth?!!!


DatFossilBoy

Recommended Posts

Hi all.

I saw this online and I was amazed.

The fossil is sold as a pterosaur tooth from Kem Kem.

 

Size:  49 x 8 mm 


This species of pterosaurs could reach a wingspan of up to 6 meters ! »

 

Could it really be a fully rooted pterosaur tooth? For me it’s really big for a pterosaur.

What do you think? Never saw a fully rooted one. Rare? Do you think it could be a fake?

Regards.

DC82F9D0-A69D-4315-97BE-D4F1D872888D.jpeg

CBCF49E6-E44F-4A56-AD53-31FC2CAAAE97.jpeg

3DFEB452-DE2A-486C-9B90-22BBFFB94888.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A fully rooted pterosaur tooth can reach this length. The tip to me looks a bit weird but that could just be me. @Tidgy's Dad and @Troodon will for sure be able to help.

  • I found this Informative 1

Life started in the ocean. And so did my interest in fossils;).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it's real, and it looks nice, but I agree with @indominus rex that the tip looks a bit weird. It's not a small tooth,  but I isn't that big either.

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe it’s just me but it looks suspiciously like a hybodontid fin spike.

  • I found this Informative 6

“...whilst this planet has gone cycling on according to the fixed law of gravity, from so simple a beginning endless forms most beautiful and most wonderful have been and are being evolved.” ~ Charles Darwin

Happy hunting,

Mason

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, WhodamanHD said:

Maybe it’s just me but it looks suspiciously like a hybodontid fin spike.

I think you're right. 

Looks like a hybodont shark dorsal fin spine with an odd end fixed on. 

I don't think any of it's pterosaur at all. 

  • I found this Informative 6

Life's Good!

Tortoise Friend.

MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png.a47e14d65deb3f8b242019b3a81d8160-1.png.60b8b8c07f6fa194511f8b7cfb7cc190.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks more like a Plesiosaur tooth the root is rounded but I don't think they are in the Kem Kem so no idea.  

Here is Pterosaur rooted tooth

DSC05013asm.jpg.7b6c33aab9bf8473869d47511f19c2bd.jpg

DSC05014asm.jpg.b35c525b4c676cbe55f641d712095f9b.jpg

  • I found this Informative 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hybodus Shark Spine #05 Kem Kem, Morocco, Dinosaur Era FossilI think one of these fins spines with the end missing so they glued something else's tip on the top. 

  • I found this Informative 2

Life's Good!

Tortoise Friend.

MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png.a47e14d65deb3f8b242019b3a81d8160-1.png.60b8b8c07f6fa194511f8b7cfb7cc190.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The root is oval not flat so I'm not seeing a spine more like this one that belongs to Andy.  But his is not Kem Kem.  We can all agree it's not pterosaur?

Marine_Plesiosaur_1b.jpg.eb00234e81c27066012fcff3667cf7a6.thumb.jpg.75f397634f300c883567d2d943596a7a.jpg

@LordTrilobite

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree that this fossil in the original post looks quite odd. Doesn't look very much like a pterosaur tooth to me either. I don't think it looks like the typical hybodont spines either as it seems very round. Though they have spines in several places. Maybe a spine from a different area of the shark? I'm not that familiar with sharks so I dunno.

But yeah, I don't think it's pterosaur.

  • I found this Informative 1

Olof Moleman AKA Lord Trilobite

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, LordTrilobite said:

Maybe a spine from a different area of the shark? I'm not that familiar with sharks so I dunno.

Me neither but maybe pectoral fin?

“...whilst this planet has gone cycling on according to the fixed law of gravity, from so simple a beginning endless forms most beautiful and most wonderful have been and are being evolved.” ~ Charles Darwin

Happy hunting,

Mason

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I totally agree.

Probably not Pterosaur. Not too sure if it’s a shark spine though,they look quite different.I can see a difference between the tip and the tooth. Couldn’t it still be a tooth?

Thanks for the help.

Regards.

Ps: notice that the bottom of the fossil is hollow.

ECDBBC99-6C8D-4DF9-885B-484D81F59617.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...