Jump to content

Unknown from Port Mulgrave


James Pattison

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

We found this at Port Mulgrave today and are not sure what this is? Can anyone help? Sorry if this is obvious but we are new to fossils and do not have a lot of experience. 

IMG_20180326_212637.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Welcome to the Forum. :)

 

Flipped, cropped and brightened. 

 

Looks like Port Mulgrave has Jurassic fossils available. 
Maybe someone more local will chime in. :)

 

IMG_20180326_212637.thumb.jpg.399f7910c274a6efbd8e2e842b5a21ae.jpg

    Tim    -  VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER

   MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png      PaleoPartner.png.30c01982e09b0cc0b7d9d6a7a21f56c6.png.a600039856933851eeea617ca3f2d15f.png     Postmaster1.jpg.900efa599049929531fa81981f028e24.jpg    VFOTM.png.f1b09c78bf88298b009b0da14ef44cf0.png  VFOTM  --- APRIL - 2015  

__________________________________________________
"In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks."

John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~   ><))))( *>  About Me      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe a few more pictures with more angles, lighting as well as close-ups could help. Honestly can't tell right now.

 

Wild stab: Cephalopod...?

  • I found this Informative 1

Every single fossil you see is a miracle set in stone, and should be treated as such.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe Belemnotheutis sometimes incorrectly called Belemnoteuthis, a coleoid cephalopod which can be found in Port Mulgrave. 

  • I found this Informative 4

Life's Good!

Tortoise Friend.

MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png.a47e14d65deb3f8b242019b3a81d8160-1.png.60b8b8c07f6fa194511f8b7cfb7cc190.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the quick replies. I had a look and yes, I can see it has the same conical shape as a cephalopod. I've added a couple of other photos, hopefully they help.  Sorry the photos are not perfect but I have no editing software to enhance them. We found ammonites by the bucket load but this looked unusual. 

20180326_225027.jpg

20180326_225036.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ludwigia said:

Looks like a severely eroded belemnite phragmocone to me.

 

50 minutes ago, Welsh Wizard said:

Hi

 

yes, the imprint of a belemnite phragmacone

Mightn't it be overlarge for that?
Or were there some big honking belemnites there/then?

  • I found this Informative 1

"There has been an alarming increase in the number of things I know nothing about." - Ashleigh Ellwood Brilliant

“Try to learn something about everything and everything about something.” - Thomas Henry Huxley

>Paleontology is an evolving science.

>May your wonders never cease!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Auspex said:

 

Mightn't it be overlarge for that?
Or were there some big honking belemnites there/then?

Not a guard but here a tip I have. Dunno how big it would have been. Also a trade with @TqB who no doubt will add to the conversation. :) 

 

5148070A-50A0-47EC-9425-7F2918C0BD0F.thumb.jpeg.6ff620645ea6ad5086084820ca2be0f7.jpegB48BC907-D58D-4C10-829B-A0B797590AAE.thumb.jpeg.22b30127995433c0c0359f4270fcbb07.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is indeed a weathered belemnite phragmocone, also showing the front, alveolar, part of the rostrum.

Although generally rarely preserved, phragmocones are quite common in the Grey Shales (Lower Toarcian) along the coast around there, Port Mulgrave having fine exposures. 

(They also occur more rarely in lower and higher beds).

 

From the Grey Shales and at that size, it will be Passaloteuthis bisulcata - here are a couple complete with rostrum. The first has the phragmocone inside a nodule (and needs more prepping!), the second is not quite so well preserved as a sub-nodule.

 

IMG_0266c.thumb.jpg.934963d4cf9c88a01a567002744a0e05.jpg

 

IMG_1115.thumb.jpg.35743656b1b4ab554c7cb2e7b0b31dc7.jpg

 

 

  • I found this Informative 3

Tarquin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Auspex said:

 

Mightn't it be overlarge for that?
Or were there some big honking belemnites there/then?

Yes, you certainly can find some honkers there, as Tarquin has already pointed out. This first one is an Acrocoelites (17cm.) with pyritized phragmocone and even part of the soft tissue above it found at Kettleness just down the road from Port Mulgrave. The second is a concretion with phragmocone (7cm.) from Port Mulgrave.

Be11.2.thumb.jpg.d2688d372cc7256f5364d1686cc25767.jpg

 

Be42c.2.thumb.jpg.68ca1ba489a40c34e01fb487796952bc.jpg

Be42ab.2.thumb.jpg.34454bccd10fd5fa16f37cf9bcdfcd61.jpg

 

  • I found this Informative 1

 

Greetings from the Lake of Constance. Roger

http://www.steinkern.de/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the input, although not quite as impressive as some of the photos you guys have put on! At least now I know what I'm looking at next time I'm down at Port Mulgrave. The place was teeming with Jurassic fossils although it was a very hard route down to the shore due to a landslip, very steep path and very muddy - especially with a 6 year and a 9 year old! I'll have a look at Kettleness as well next time I'm down that way.

 

 

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...