Jump to content

Jazfossilator

Recommended Posts

Found this years ago at Myrtle beach South Carolina, could it be a water worn tooth? Any ideas would be great

IMG_2560.JPG

IMG_2565.JPG

IMG_2566.JPG

IMG_2567.JPG

IMG_2557.JPG

IMG_2568.JPG

IMG_2613.JPG

IMG_2614.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It could, but i'm not definite. Is it deeply hollow ?

theme-celtique.png.bbc4d5765974b5daba0607d157eecfed.png.7c09081f292875c94595c562a862958c.png

"On ne voit bien que par le coeur, l'essentiel est invisible pour les yeux." (Antoine de Saint-Exupéry)

"We only well see with the heart, the essential is invisible for the eyes."

 

In memory of Doren

photo-thumb-12286.jpg.878620deab804c0e4e53f3eab4625b4c.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, fifbrindacier said:

It could, but i'm not definite. Is it deeply hollow ?

It goes atleast halfway down the object from what I can see, the opening is very small and seems to get thinner the further down it goes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

maybe alligator

 

"Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence"_ Carl Sagen

No trees were killed in this posting......however, many innocent electrons were diverted from where they originally intended to go.

" I think, therefore I collect fossils." _ Me

"When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth."__S. Holmes

"can't we all just get along?" Jack Nicholson from Mars Attacks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Herb said:

maybe alligator

 

That'd be my guess. Pretty certainly a large Tertiary reptile.

"There has been an alarming increase in the number of things I know nothing about." - Ashleigh Ellwood Brilliant

“Try to learn something about everything and everything about something.” - Thomas Henry Huxley

>Paleontology is an evolving science.

>May your wonders never cease!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm really curious about the fold on the outer edge, I don't believe alligators or crocodiles

11 minutes ago, Auspex said:

That'd be my guess. Pretty certainly a large Tertiary reptile.

 have that? I've been stumped on this one for a while but the worn nature of it doesn't help of course

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm thinking of a  worn proboscidean molar loph, gomphothere / mammoth as a possibility. :)

 

pliocene-gomphotherium-probiscid-tooth-2c.jpg.dddcfab2f8213525a68b2661aabf5470.jpg

  • I found this Informative 3

" We are not separate and independent entities, but like links in a chain, and we could not by any means be what we are without those who went before us and showed us the way. "

Thomas Mann

My Library

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, abyssunder said:

I'm thinking of a  worn proboscidean molar loph, gomphothere / mammoth as a possibility.

Oooo...maybe a bit of very worn mammoth tooth root?

  • I found this Informative 3

"There has been an alarming increase in the number of things I know nothing about." - Ashleigh Ellwood Brilliant

“Try to learn something about everything and everything about something.” - Thomas Henry Huxley

>Paleontology is an evolving science.

>May your wonders never cease!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Auspex said:

Oooo...maybe a bit of very worn mammoth tooth root?

I'm not sure which part of the loph might be ( if it's that), the root to the crown or the crown to the root junction, but the more I look, the more I see the proboscidean character. I'm guessing it might be the latter. :headscratch:

  • I found this Informative 2

" We are not separate and independent entities, but like links in a chain, and we could not by any means be what we are without those who went before us and showed us the way. "

Thomas Mann

My Library

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now I think I see it, the root, if I compare it with the root shown in Figure 1 below (the lateral longitudinal groove of it).

 

55710db255b644aa160a85b8103f0b26--science-words-tooth.jpg.a08ec02860359c7f8d24cc4de62cbc47.jpg

 

If it's that, congratulations, Sir! :)

  • I found this Informative 1

" We are not separate and independent entities, but like links in a chain, and we could not by any means be what we are without those who went before us and showed us the way. "

Thomas Mann

My Library

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, abyssunder said:

Now I think I see it, the root, if I compare it with the root shown in Figure 1 below (the lateral longitudinal groove of it).

 

55710db255b644aa160a85b8103f0b26--science-words-tooth.jpg.a08ec02860359c7f8d24cc4de62cbc47.jpg

 

If it's that, congratulations, Sir! :)

That would be fantastic! I can see what you mean for sure, thank you very much:D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a possibility, but its density seems more like dentin than bone...
I also do not know what a cross section of a mammoth tooth root looks like, but I do know that large reptile teeth have a canal much like the mystery piece.

~~.jpg

  • I found this Informative 2

"There has been an alarming increase in the number of things I know nothing about." - Ashleigh Ellwood Brilliant

“Try to learn something about everything and everything about something.” - Thomas Henry Huxley

>Paleontology is an evolving science.

>May your wonders never cease!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It really looks like the first photo posted by @abyssunder. It's a nice find !

theme-celtique.png.bbc4d5765974b5daba0607d157eecfed.png.7c09081f292875c94595c562a862958c.png

"On ne voit bien que par le coeur, l'essentiel est invisible pour les yeux." (Antoine de Saint-Exupéry)

"We only well see with the heart, the essential is invisible for the eyes."

 

In memory of Doren

photo-thumb-12286.jpg.878620deab804c0e4e53f3eab4625b4c.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still don't know....

~~.jpg

"There has been an alarming increase in the number of things I know nothing about." - Ashleigh Ellwood Brilliant

“Try to learn something about everything and everything about something.” - Thomas Henry Huxley

>Paleontology is an evolving science.

>May your wonders never cease!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Auspex said:

I still don't know....

~~.jpg

I would be just as happy with large worn reptile tooth!, I just haven't seen any examples like this piece. I'm going to post a few more pics in a short while

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Harry Pristis said:

 

My own impression is of the anterior fang of the root of a carnivore carnassial, likely a dire wolf.

 

 

direwolfm1.JPG

I saw this picture online and thought that root looked very similar in shape, I wish I could look closer,that would be a fantastic find for me as well :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem with beach finds often is the poor shape they are in that makes identification impossible sometimes. Then when you add in the different ages of the fossils found at Myrtle Beach it becomes even tougher. There is Cretaceous PeeDee, the Pliocene Goose Creek Limestone, the early Pleistocene Waccamaw Formation and the middle Pleistocene Canepatch Formation. I will agree that it is not a croc tooth and that is is a well worn and broken part of some type of fossil. Anything beyond that is purely speculation.

  • I found this Informative 2

Bulldozers and dirt Bulldozers and dirt
behind the trailer, my desert
Them red clay piles are heaven on earth
I get my rocks off, bulldozers and dirt

Patterson Hood; Drive-By Truckers

 

image.png.0c956e87cee523facebb6947cb34e842.png May 2016  MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png.a47e14d65deb3f8b242019b3a81d8160.png.b42a25e3438348310ba19ce6852f50c1.png May 2012 IPFOTM5.png.fb4f2a268e315c58c5980ed865b39e1f.png.1721b8912c45105152ac70b0ae8303c3.png.2b6263683ee32421d97e7fa481bd418a.pngAug 2013, May 2016, Apr 2020 VFOTM.png.f1b09c78bf88298b009b0da14ef44cf0.png.af5065d0585e85f4accd8b291bf0cc2e.png.72a83362710033c9bdc8510be7454b66.png.9171036128e7f95de57b6a0f03c491da.png Oct 2022

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, sixgill pete said:

The problem with beach finds often is the poor shape they are in that makes identification impossible sometimes. Then when you add in the different ages of the fossils found at Myrtle Beach it becomes even tougher. There is Cretaceous PeeDee, the Pliocene Goose Creek Limestone, the early Pleistocene Waccamaw Formation and the middle Pleistocene Canepatch Formation. I will agree that it is not a croc tooth and that is is a well worn and broken part of some type of fossil. Anything beyond that is purely speculation.

 

ummmmmm Cretaceous! :zen:

 

If only our favorite river wasn't above 18' and forecast to be at 19' soon. :angry:

Don't know much about history

Don't know much biology

Don't know much about science books.........

Sam Cooke - (What A) Wonderful World

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, sixgill pete said:

The problem with beach finds often is the poor shape they are in that makes identification impossible sometimes. Then when you add in the different ages of the fossils found at Myrtle Beach it becomes even tougher. There is Cretaceous PeeDee, the Pliocene Goose Creek Limestone, the early Pleistocene Waccamaw Formation and the middle Pleistocene Canepatch Formation. I will agree that it is not a croc tooth and that is is a well worn and broken part of some type of fossil. Anything beyond that is purely speculation.

I know, speculation is all that can be had for many fossils but that doesn't mean it's uninformative, I appreciate hearing all of the ideas people have, I only post fossils that I'm very unsure of and so usually they are tough if not impossible to identify. I don't take any one answer to be undeniable truth but rather weigh all of the options presented and make my best educated guess for labeling purposes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SailingAlongToo said:

 

ummmmmm Cretaceous! :zen:

 

If only our favorite river wasn't above 18' and forecast to be at 19' soon. :angry:

Jack, I am jonesing for the water to go down.  Go a couple of really nice ecphora and a few other cool things on the the day before it went back up.

Bulldozers and dirt Bulldozers and dirt
behind the trailer, my desert
Them red clay piles are heaven on earth
I get my rocks off, bulldozers and dirt

Patterson Hood; Drive-By Truckers

 

image.png.0c956e87cee523facebb6947cb34e842.png May 2016  MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png.a47e14d65deb3f8b242019b3a81d8160.png.b42a25e3438348310ba19ce6852f50c1.png May 2012 IPFOTM5.png.fb4f2a268e315c58c5980ed865b39e1f.png.1721b8912c45105152ac70b0ae8303c3.png.2b6263683ee32421d97e7fa481bd418a.pngAug 2013, May 2016, Apr 2020 VFOTM.png.f1b09c78bf88298b009b0da14ef44cf0.png.af5065d0585e85f4accd8b291bf0cc2e.png.72a83362710033c9bdc8510be7454b66.png.9171036128e7f95de57b6a0f03c491da.png Oct 2022

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, sixgill pete said:

Jack, I am jonesing for the water to go down.  Go a couple of really nice ecphora and a few other cool things on the the day before it went back up.

 

Theresa is jonesing to add some NC ecphora to her collection.........  hint...... hint......  :drool::fingerscrossed:

 

We need to get you up this way for a weekend with us.

 

Trevor aka @Daleksec found this "little beauty" Sunday afternoon at one of my spots on another river we hunt. It's his 2nd in a week.

 

58474.thumb.jpeg.852b6a1f6443f5bc9ab0ca122bc80276.jpeg58479.thumb.jpeg.6097f6da9a8bd55fbf93605cfa26b283.jpeg

Don't know much about history

Don't know much biology

Don't know much about science books.........

Sam Cooke - (What A) Wonderful World

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

21 minutes ago, Jazfossilator said:

I know, speculation is all that can be had for many fossils but that doesn't mean it's uninformative, I appreciate hearing all of the ideas people have, I only post fossils that I'm very unsure of and so usually they are tough if not impossible to identify. I don't take any one answer to be undeniable truth but rather weigh all of the options presented and make my best educated guess for labeling purposes.

Most fossils that are not worn can be identified at least to Family or Genus. But worn fossils can be tricky. Especially when it is only part of the fossil. It could be part of a broken root as Harry stated. It could also be other things. If it were in my collection it would be labeled with date found, where found and fossil undetermined.

Bulldozers and dirt Bulldozers and dirt
behind the trailer, my desert
Them red clay piles are heaven on earth
I get my rocks off, bulldozers and dirt

Patterson Hood; Drive-By Truckers

 

image.png.0c956e87cee523facebb6947cb34e842.png May 2016  MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png.a47e14d65deb3f8b242019b3a81d8160.png.b42a25e3438348310ba19ce6852f50c1.png May 2012 IPFOTM5.png.fb4f2a268e315c58c5980ed865b39e1f.png.1721b8912c45105152ac70b0ae8303c3.png.2b6263683ee32421d97e7fa481bd418a.pngAug 2013, May 2016, Apr 2020 VFOTM.png.f1b09c78bf88298b009b0da14ef44cf0.png.af5065d0585e85f4accd8b291bf0cc2e.png.72a83362710033c9bdc8510be7454b66.png.9171036128e7f95de57b6a0f03c491da.png Oct 2022

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im more inclined to think direwolf tooth root, the shape is spot on and the fold I mentioned earlier is present.

IMG_2768.JPG

IMG_2718.JPG

IMG_2719.JPG

IMG_2767.JPG

IMG_2771.JPG

IMG_2772.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...