Gracetk Posted May 6, 2018 Share Posted May 6, 2018 (edited) After walking 2+ years by the same spot, just noticed this, yesterday. It sparked an interest, but I know absolutely nothing about fossils. Is this a normal size for what I think is an ammonite? Found in Northwest Austin, Texas near the bank of Walnut Creek. I am assuming it’s limestone. Grandfather’s hammer is 37 cm. Edited May 6, 2018 by Gracetk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fossildude19 Posted May 6, 2018 Share Posted May 6, 2018 Welcome to the Forum. There isn't a lot of detail in this imprint, but I could hazard a guess that it may be a Mortoniceras sp. Perhaps some of our Texas locals can weigh in on this. Regards, 2 Tim - VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER VFOTM --- APRIL - 2015 __________________________________________________ "In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks." John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~ ><))))( *> About Me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tidgy's Dad Posted May 6, 2018 Share Posted May 6, 2018 It's a good size! Hello, and a very warm welcome to TFF from Morocco! Life's Good! Tortoise Friend. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caldigger Posted May 6, 2018 Share Posted May 6, 2018 Quick simple answer to your question. Yes, it is an ammonite impression. It is likely the actual ammonite was hauled off in a 120 pound backpack through 9 miles of wild boar infested briars and 6 foot deep sticky mud holes in pitch black middle of the night conditions by a certain blonde wearing one boot. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heteromorph Posted May 6, 2018 Share Posted May 6, 2018 I looked on the USGS Geological Map of Texas and that area of the creek exposes the Austin Chalk formation, which would match the kind of matrix shown in you picture, i.e. limestone/chalk. If it is from the Austin Chalk, the ammonite would probably be in the Texanitinae family. I am pretty sure Mortoniceras didn’t make it into the Austin Chalk, but a genus called Submortoniceras in the Texanitinae family did. That along with the genera Prionoclycloceras, Protexanites, and Texanites are good possibilities. They are all in the Texanitinae family. This is a pretty normal size for an ammonite from this time. My family has found an almost complete Protexanites sp. in the Austin Chalk from North Texas that has a diameter of 15 inches, so they can get big. I have even found two other Protexanites sp. fragments that were probably over 20 inches in diameter each when they were complete! Here is the geologic map I used. If you can determine the location where you found this on this map you can confirm whether or not it is in the Austin Chalk. USGS Geological Map of Texas I suggest getting HGMS’s book Texas Cretaceous Ammonites and Nautiloids from their website. It will help you much more easily identify ammonites. @Uncle Siphuncle EDIT: Because of how evolute this specimen is, another possibility is the genus Peroniceras. It is also known from the Austin Chalk. It is in the Collignoniceratidae family. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gracetk Posted May 6, 2018 Author Share Posted May 6, 2018 Wow, thanks for the quick responses. Need to work on my observational skills. Hoping to find more fossils. Didn’t think developed areas could still hold such surprises. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gracetk Posted May 6, 2018 Author Share Posted May 6, 2018 It is indeed located in Austin Chalk. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uncle Siphuncle Posted May 6, 2018 Share Posted May 6, 2018 Peroniceras 3 Grüße, Daniel A. Wöhr aus Südtexas "To the motivated go the spoils." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now