Jump to content

Jazfossilator

Recommended Posts

Found Myrtle Beach, South Carolina. Cretaceous, Pliocene, and Pleistocene aged material can be found there. Is this some sort of soft coral or some other aquatic plant? Not sure if a species can be narrowed down from such a small chunk but I’m open to suggestions. Help appreciated :) some of these pictures are taken under my cheap microscope hopefully they show enough details.

4F313BE4-B02F-4A1D-A078-948C95954C24.jpeg

A5C22449-4912-4738-BE78-CE92A47F1280.jpeg

4050E7D6-A4CA-4045-9EFF-F09015EB1EB7.jpeg

7055B881-5B26-4AC6-A5FB-CE53339E0972.jpeg

3EC1F8D6-981D-4052-9CEB-E0F6948D5BE9.jpeg

9E6CF461-C103-4DB2-B779-5C85BE43443C.jpeg

0F0A467C-747D-4A2C-BAFB-D93B2A668863.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe it's a sponge, something like Axinella.

" We are not separate and independent entities, but like links in a chain, and we could not by any means be what we are without those who went before us and showed us the way. "

Thomas Mann

My Library

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not bryozoan, as the geometrically patterned structures for zooids aren't present. These structures are chaotically arranged, and as @abyssunder suggested, this may be a sponge.

"Journey through a universe ablaze with changes" Phil Ochs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think sponge. 

A bit like this one from Fossil lady at WordPress.com

image.jpeg.2fd88b156a30ea9a2379657916e008ac.jpeg

Life's Good!

Tortoise Friend.

MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png.a47e14d65deb3f8b242019b3a81d8160-1.png.60b8b8c07f6fa194511f8b7cfb7cc190.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, HansTheLoser said:

Definitely not a coral.

Just curious but why was coral ruled out as a possibility so quickly? I thought that it might be a type of staghorn when I first saw it. Is it too porous?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Tidgy's Dad said:

A bit like this one from Fossil lady at WordPress.com

... and we go back to the previous topic ... :D

 

" We are not separate and independent entities, but like links in a chain, and we could not by any means be what we are without those who went before us and showed us the way. "

Thomas Mann

My Library

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, FNG said:

Just curious but why was coral ruled out as a possibility so quickly? I thought that it might be a type of staghorn when I first saw it. Is it too porous?

Corallites in modern corals are much larger than the zooids in this specimen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Al Dente said:

Corallites in modern corals are much larger than the zooids in this specimen.

Thanks, I see that now. So, just to be clear...corallites are the individuals in the colony that is coral; and zooids are the individuals in the colony that is the sponge, correct?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don’t see the uniform individual Zooids in this piece like I could in that other larger piece.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, FNG said:

Thanks, I see that now. So, just to be clear...corallites are the individuals in the colony that is coral; and zooids are the individuals in the colony that is the sponge, correct?

A corallite is the living chamber, a calcareous skeleton that housed an individual coral polyp, solitary or colonial. 

A zooid is one animal that is part of a colonial animal, so includes bryozoa, corals, or even graptolites, as examples.  

In sponges the holes are pores to allow water to circulate and the solid structure is the animal. 

Life's Good!

Tortoise Friend.

MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png.a47e14d65deb3f8b242019b3a81d8160-1.png.60b8b8c07f6fa194511f8b7cfb7cc190.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Tidgy's Dad said:

A corallite is the living chamber, a calcareous skeleton that housed an individual coral polyp, solitary or colonial. 

A zooid is one animal that is part of a colonial animal, so includes bryozoa, corals, or even graptolites, as examples.  

In sponges the holes are pores to allow water to circulate and the solid structure is the animal. 

Thanks. Obviously, I need to study these more. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

here are some closeups of the piece I found before that abyssunder posted a link too, in case the comparison helps.  

C836113E-3998-4294-AC2E-547A511CAB74.thumb.jpeg.cf147383bd7cde590c2c85008f01d686.jpeg1457874F-3C87-45DC-83CC-9E8592564ECD.thumb.jpeg.31076f00a0f07126a7186073ddfe2366.jpeg716B4FBD-56CB-4859-ABF5-BA7352A33CAD.thumb.jpeg.5f587fb5f235711f0363d647a17cd4a7.jpegC4EB6E67-0167-4DF5-853D-62BE81A541BD.thumb.jpeg.fc5b2a64022758cdfd9650a4ed2614fb.jpeg

I didn’t notice this feature before

0A671212-D5B2-4971-B8F8-EA0EB695576F.thumb.jpeg.e6b3bf93edf8504799d5c6ad421ca937.jpegED34BE8F-9E66-4A74-BDF1-00D32EFDAEC6.thumb.jpeg.2d471bb64a6e9939a66474d20f7e58a0.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's a comparison from the NC Fossil Club publication "Fossil Invertebrates and Plants" that differentiates coral, bryozoan and sponges.

 

 

bryosponge.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Tidgy's Dad said:

I think sponge. 

A bit like this one from Fossil lady at WordPress.com

image.jpeg.2fd88b156a30ea9a2379657916e008ac.jpeg

I'm fairly confident the item in the photo from Fossil Lady is not a sponge. Looks like a very worn modern coral or calcareous hydrozoan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm in the sponge camp.

theme-celtique.png.bbc4d5765974b5daba0607d157eecfed.png.7c09081f292875c94595c562a862958c.png

"On ne voit bien que par le coeur, l'essentiel est invisible pour les yeux." (Antoine de Saint-Exupéry)

"We only well see with the heart, the essential is invisible for the eyes."

 

In memory of Doren

photo-thumb-12286.jpg.878620deab804c0e4e53f3eab4625b4c.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll go in both cases / topics with sponges.
Can we have a clearer image of this area?

 

C4EB6E67-0167-4DF5-853D-62BE81A541BD.jpeg.843bf4af5de18ff18309873d5d11f609.thumb.jpg.32b8f573021efd10119e766fff7aa2eb.jpg

" We are not separate and independent entities, but like links in a chain, and we could not by any means be what we are without those who went before us and showed us the way. "

Thomas Mann

My Library

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, abyssunder said:

I'll go in both cases / topics with sponges.
Can we have a clearer image of this area?

 

C4EB6E67-0167-4DF5-853D-62BE81A541BD.jpeg.843bf4af5de18ff18309873d5d11f609.thumb.jpg.32b8f573021efd10119e766fff7aa2eb.jpg

not sure if I got the right bit as its all quite small and looks similar but maybe one of these other photos will help.

DECFEDD8-4F32-42F0-8017-E75695896AE5.jpeg

190228DD-7479-4647-A528-1C9A19AD72E8.jpeg

0C9A73A1-8991-484C-A588-CF902AA0D07A.jpeg

06BE74E2-A9C0-4D06-BD85-B0222EEF3B1E.jpeg

45332FB8-295E-49FB-8296-FCB401DF0322.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jazfossilator's close ups show a bunch of zooids that have been broken and abraded, typical of a beach find. Here are some pictures from the NC Fossil club publication that are vaguely similar but are not the same species as the specimen in question. These show a similar shaped zooid type. 

bryoHornera.JPG

bryoOnychocella.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@Tidgy's Dad A zooid is one animal that is part of a colonial animal, so includes bryozoa, corals, or even graptolites, as examples. 

 

From a layman's perspective, I always thought a graptolite was an individual organism. You are saying it is a host of individuals????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmm, i have doubts now, sponge or bryozoan ?

theme-celtique.png.bbc4d5765974b5daba0607d157eecfed.png.7c09081f292875c94595c562a862958c.png

"On ne voit bien que par le coeur, l'essentiel est invisible pour les yeux." (Antoine de Saint-Exupéry)

"We only well see with the heart, the essential is invisible for the eyes."

 

In memory of Doren

photo-thumb-12286.jpg.878620deab804c0e4e53f3eab4625b4c.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, fifbrindacier said:

Hmm, i have doubts now, sponge or bryozoan ?

Me too. The bryozoans I'm used to finding in the upper Carboniferous/lower Permian have regularly spaced zooid openings, much different than the picture @Al Dente posted from NC Fossil club publication. What a difference 150 million years made.

"Journey through a universe ablaze with changes" Phil Ochs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...