Jump to content

Cretaceous ID needed


Gen. et sp. indet.

Recommended Posts

Specimen No. 1 - unknown ?encruster with attachment frills? and rugged ribs

IMAG3706a.thumb.jpg.a5a7c4193ed5df647eedbbbfb4a8ad63.jpg

IMAG4372a.thumb.jpg.4947ca5ab8fd1d91cb00a67dde1f06a8.jpg

IMAG4393a.thumb.jpg.51536892cb4df9450ff96a85b8870c57.jpg

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Specimen No. 2 - two? bivalves: spiny ?spondylid with attachment frills? attached to a smaller ?spondylid

IMAG4293a.thumb.jpg.ea5f18462f76aad68a56a61aae21a3c3.jpgIMAG4296a.thumb.jpg.d133951cb8eea807e08b064972f1d5db.jpg

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They do look like spiny spondylid bivalves. 

I think what you have there is that the outer mineralized and replaced shell has been broken away in some places to reveal the internal mould underneath. 

Thus it appears like one inside the other. 

Except for the last couple of shots that show a couple of specimens near/ overlapping each other. 

Nice finds! :) 

Life's Good!

Tortoise Friend.

MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png.a47e14d65deb3f8b242019b3a81d8160-1.png.60b8b8c07f6fa194511f8b7cfb7cc190.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you for the answer!

1 hour ago, Tidgy's Dad said:

the outer minerlized and replaced shell has been broken away in some places to reveal the internal mould underneath. 

Thus it appears like one inside the other.

Yes, I know that! I was referring to the specimen No. 2, which clearly shows a smaller individual on one side of the larger.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...