Jump to content

New to town and need help!


Erbi1421

Recommended Posts

I am new to this group and would like to say hello and ask for some help. I started walking the beach and collecting sharks teeth and shells. I have acquired more than a thousand teeth in the last 3 or 4 months. I have not a clue what tooth belongs to which shark! Any help please and I will start posting my weekend finds! This is a photo of a few out of my collection.. Thank you! 

 

IMG_2214.JPG

Edited by Erbi1421
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perhaps if you could put a number next to each tooth, otherwise it may get rather confusing trying to ID each without reference as to which is being discussed.

And please have picture in full light. It is difficult to see in the shadows.

Dorensigbadges.JPG       

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello, and a very warm welcome to TFF from Morocco.

I know very little about these, but some of those look great. :)

Life's Good!

Tortoise Friend.

MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png.a47e14d65deb3f8b242019b3a81d8160-1.png.60b8b8c07f6fa194511f8b7cfb7cc190.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Welcome to TFF!

You have several types of shark teeth.

I see Sand tiger, tiger, white, lemon and bull or dusky in the mix.

http://elasmo.com/  and  http://naka.na.coocan.jp/

are good sites for information about shark teeth.

 

If You are searching for an ID good clear pictures if  the teeth are needed. A group shot like the one provided are difficult to reply to.

You should also make Your thread in the "fossil ID" subforum.

  • I found this Informative 1

Darwin said: " Man sprang from monkeys."

Will Rogers said: " Some of them didn't spring far enough."

 

My Fossil collection - My Mineral collection

My favorite thread on TFF.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, caldigger said:

Perhaps if you could put a number next to each tooth, otherwise it may get rather confusing trying to ID each without reference as to which is being discussed.

And please have picture in full light. It is difficult to see in the shadows.

Thank you I will post it as suggested! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Tidgy's Dad said:

Hello, and a very warm welcome to TFF from Morocco.

I know very little about these, but some of those look great. :)

Hello! Thank you

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Welcome to the Forum. :) 

 

I took the liberty of numbering your finds. ;) 

Regards,

 

IMG_2214.JPG.9db3895962ea2ea5611d372cef7e047f.JPG

  • I found this Informative 3

    Tim    -  VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER

   MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png      PaleoPartner.png.30c01982e09b0cc0b7d9d6a7a21f56c6.png.a600039856933851eeea617ca3f2d15f.png     Postmaster1.jpg.900efa599049929531fa81981f028e24.jpg    VFOTM.png.f1b09c78bf88298b009b0da14ef44cf0.png  VFOTM  --- APRIL - 2015  

__________________________________________________
"In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks."

John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~   ><))))( *>  About Me      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Fossildude19 said:

Welcome to the Forum. :) 

 

I took the liberty of numbering your finds. ;) 

Regards,

 

IMG_2214.JPG.9db3895962ea2ea5611d372cef7e047f.JPG

Thank you! I have added some also! And glad to be here! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IMG_2215.JPG-vert.jpg

    Tim    -  VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER

   MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png      PaleoPartner.png.30c01982e09b0cc0b7d9d6a7a21f56c6.png.a600039856933851eeea617ca3f2d15f.png     Postmaster1.jpg.900efa599049929531fa81981f028e24.jpg    VFOTM.png.f1b09c78bf88298b009b0da14ef44cf0.png  VFOTM  --- APRIL - 2015  

__________________________________________________
"In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks."

John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~   ><))))( *>  About Me      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Welcome to the forum Eribi!

 

Here's my list on what I think the IDs would be. Keep in mind that some of the IDs may be wrong.

Note: Cosmopolitodus is disputed genera, with Carcharodon being another commonly used genus being argued on.

IMG_2215.JPG-vert.jpg

1. Carcharodon carcharias

2. ?

3. Carcharhinus leucas

4. Cosmopolitodus hastalis

5. Carcharhinus sp.

6. Carcharhinus amblyrhynchos?

7. Carcharias cupsidata

8. Isurus oxyrinchus

9. Weltonia?

10. Carcharhinus sp.

11. Hemipristis serra

12. Carcharhinus leucas

13. Carcharodon carcharias

14. Galeocedro cuvier

15. Carcharhinus leucas

16. Carcharhinus leucas

17. Hemipristis serra

  • I found this Informative 1

If you're a fossil nut from Palos Verdes, San Pedro, Redondo Beach, or Torrance, feel free to shoot me a PM!

 

 

Mosasaurus_hoffmannii_skull_schematic.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, ynot said:

Should be Carcharodon hastalis.

I do not think that it is a good idea to correct someone regarding a taxon that is still in dispute. There is no full consensus on whether or not hastalis should be fully assimilated into Carcharodon, as the situation regarding it is still very much debatable. Nevertheless, Cosmopolitodus is still widely used in scientific papers post Ehert et al. (2012).

 

I don't want to pull up a debate on this right now, but please don't correct someone who used a taxon that is currently in dispute and debated. ;)

  • I found this Informative 1

If you're a fossil nut from Palos Verdes, San Pedro, Redondo Beach, or Torrance, feel free to shoot me a PM!

 

 

Mosasaurus_hoffmannii_skull_schematic.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As this species is still in dispute, best would have been to put directly both names ! Why in this case to favor a name rather than an other one ?

 

Don't recriminate anybody who completes an information ! And everybody has the right to express his opinion, thank you for respecting him and of not feeling you attacked ! A little of humility, young boy ! ;)

 

Coco

 

  • I found this Informative 2

----------------------
OUTIL POUR MESURER VOS FOSSILES : ici

Ma bibliothèque PDF 1 (Poissons et sélaciens récents & fossiles) : ici
Ma bibliothèque PDF 2 (Animaux vivants - sans poissons ni sélaciens) : ici
Mâchoires sélaciennes récentes : ici
Hétérodontiques et sélaciens : ici
Oeufs sélaciens récents : ici
Otolithes de poissons récents ! ici

Un Greg...

Badges-IPFOTH.jpg.f4a8635cda47a3cc506743a8aabce700.jpg Badges-MOTM.jpg.461001e1a9db5dc29ca1c07a041a1a86.jpg

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Macrophyseter said:

Welcome to the forum Eribi!

 

Here's my list on what I think the IDs would be. Keep in mind that some of the IDs may be wrong.

IMG_2215.JPG-vert.jpg

1. Carcharodon carcharias

2. ?

3. Carcharhinus leucas

4. Cosmopolitodus hastalis

5. Carcharhinus sp.

6. Carcharhinus amblyrhynchos?

7. Carcharias cupsidata

8. Isurus oxyrinchus

9. Weltonia?

10. Carcharhinus sp.

11. Hemipristis serra

12. Carcharhinus leucas

13. Carcharodon carcharias

14. Galeocedro cuvier

15. Carcharhinus leucas

16. Carcharhinus leucas

17. Hemipristis serra

Thank you so much! So interesting I tried

to find them through research and was incorrect! Thank you again! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

These teeth are worn out (probably rolled by the effect of water), and the genus Carcharhinus is the one which contains most recent species (more than 30), then I think it is almost impossible to give a species name to worn out fossil Carcharhinus, especially as regards the lower teeth... Sorry for that.

 

Coco

  • I found this Informative 1

----------------------
OUTIL POUR MESURER VOS FOSSILES : ici

Ma bibliothèque PDF 1 (Poissons et sélaciens récents & fossiles) : ici
Ma bibliothèque PDF 2 (Animaux vivants - sans poissons ni sélaciens) : ici
Mâchoires sélaciennes récentes : ici
Hétérodontiques et sélaciens : ici
Oeufs sélaciens récents : ici
Otolithes de poissons récents ! ici

Un Greg...

Badges-IPFOTH.jpg.f4a8635cda47a3cc506743a8aabce700.jpg Badges-MOTM.jpg.461001e1a9db5dc29ca1c07a041a1a86.jpg

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Macrophyseter said:

I do not think that it is a good idea to correct someone regarding a taxon that is still in dispute. There is no full consensus on whether or not hastalis should be fully assimilated into Carcharodon, as the situation regarding it is still very much debatable. Nevertheless, Cosmopolitodus is still widely used in scientific papers post Ehert et al. (2012).

 

I don't want to pull up a debate on this right now, but please don't correct someone who used a taxon that is currently in dispute and debated. ;)

As Coco wisely stated,  when names are disputed, it is best to include both, even if one is mentioned as a possible name.

Science is always up for debate, and while I agree it may have come across as brusque, he was only trying to help. 

Still being undetermined, it is good to get in the habit of using both, I think.

  • I found this Informative 1

    Tim    -  VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER

   MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png      PaleoPartner.png.30c01982e09b0cc0b7d9d6a7a21f56c6.png.a600039856933851eeea617ca3f2d15f.png     Postmaster1.jpg.900efa599049929531fa81981f028e24.jpg    VFOTM.png.f1b09c78bf88298b009b0da14ef44cf0.png  VFOTM  --- APRIL - 2015  

__________________________________________________
"In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks."

John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~   ><))))( *>  About Me      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...