Jump to content

Id love to know more about this piece i found.


Wrenchchik

Recommended Posts

I found this in Ellsworth county kansas.  I am very curious what it is and how it came to be. It looks to be wood with a layer of fossils.  

20180722_182446.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's a neon pink pen. Just kidding, I don't know, but more knowledgeable people will arrive shortly

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks to be rock with burrowing organisms such as various bivalves, anything past that you'll need someone more knowledgeable than me, but I doubt the ID can get much more specific than that. Also, welcome to TFF:ammonite01:

 

EDIT: I meant burrowing organism burrows, not the organisms themselves, my bad! :doh!:

rydysig.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That looks like cone in cone structures. Not a fossil.

 

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cone-in-cone_structures

  • I found this Informative 3

    Tim    -  VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER

   MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png      PaleoPartner.png.30c01982e09b0cc0b7d9d6a7a21f56c6.png.a600039856933851eeea617ca3f2d15f.png     Postmaster1.jpg.900efa599049929531fa81981f028e24.jpg    VFOTM.png.f1b09c78bf88298b009b0da14ef44cf0.png  VFOTM  --- APRIL - 2015  

__________________________________________________
"In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks."

John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~   ><))))( *>  About Me      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like both cone in cone and +1 for turritella snail. Interesting combination with the fossil layer sitting on top?/bottom of the cones.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Yes its full of gastropods.  Except in that layer.   Curious what caused it.   These are others (i have several) that were found in same general area. Obviously a lot newer as the two on the top have not turned to rock,  but they're almost identical.      I will look up cone in cone structures as i have no idea what that means :)

20180722_191918.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Fossildude19 said:

That looks like cone in cone structures. Not a fossil.

 

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cone-in-cone_structures

I wonder if there is some selenite or gypsum crystalized veins mixed in there.

Especially the upper right piece in the last picture.

Bottom center is good example of cone in cone.

  • I found this Informative 1

Darwin said: " Man sprang from monkeys."

Will Rogers said: " Some of them didn't spring far enough."

 

My Fossil collection - My Mineral collection

My favorite thread on TFF.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see some bivalve imprints in the second picture posted. Possible inoceramids or other types. 

 

20180722_182344.jpg.58987015724c19b50531f9a2a07f45cc.jpg

  • I found this Informative 3

    Tim    -  VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER

   MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png      PaleoPartner.png.30c01982e09b0cc0b7d9d6a7a21f56c6.png.a600039856933851eeea617ca3f2d15f.png     Postmaster1.jpg.900efa599049929531fa81981f028e24.jpg    VFOTM.png.f1b09c78bf88298b009b0da14ef44cf0.png  VFOTM  --- APRIL - 2015  

__________________________________________________
"In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks."

John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~   ><))))( *>  About Me      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To confirm, these are the babies (it appears to be literally covered) of the larger bivalves circled in the comment above?

Here are two pretty good examples of ones that are part of a mildly cleaned up section, right at the tip of the pen.   

20180723_004908.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Wrenchchik said:

To confirm, these are the babies (it appears to be literally covered) of the larger bivalves circled in the comment above?

Ostracod is another possibility.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lots of little bivalves, I think, not brachiopods. 

Interesting piece. :)

Life's Good!

Tortoise Friend.

MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png.a47e14d65deb3f8b242019b3a81d8160-1.png.60b8b8c07f6fa194511f8b7cfb7cc190.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/23/2018 at 2:40 AM, Wrenchchik said:

To confirm, these are the babies (it appears to be literally covered) of the larger bivalves circled in the comment above?

Here are two pretty good examples of ones that are part of a mildly cleaned up section, right at the tip of the pen.   

 

Not enough detail of the shell imprint left to be sure of anything. :( 

    Tim    -  VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER

   MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png      PaleoPartner.png.30c01982e09b0cc0b7d9d6a7a21f56c6.png.a600039856933851eeea617ca3f2d15f.png     Postmaster1.jpg.900efa599049929531fa81981f028e24.jpg    VFOTM.png.f1b09c78bf88298b009b0da14ef44cf0.png  VFOTM  --- APRIL - 2015  

__________________________________________________
"In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks."

John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~   ><))))( *>  About Me      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...