Jump to content

Innocentx

Recommended Posts

Hoping to ID the central object in this photo. It appears to be broken towards the narrower end. It has grooves running the length of it. It's approximately 1 mm or less in length. Lower Permian, Cottonwood member, Council grove group, Kansas.

Still001 2.jpg

  • I found this Informative 2

"Journey through a universe ablaze with changes" Phil Ochs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Location and formation?

On The Hunt For The Trophy Otodus!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, FossilsAnonymous said:

Location and formation?

see tags

  • I found this Informative 1

"Journey through a universe ablaze with changes" Phil Ochs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Innocentx said:

see tags

Thanks, sorry. That was dumb

  • I found this Informative 1

On The Hunt For The Trophy Otodus!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I should mention... marine environment, though there are indications of nearby shoreline.

"Journey through a universe ablaze with changes" Phil Ochs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Innocentx said:

see tags

Most people overlook the tags, which are designed to make searches more accurate for people searching specific things.

It is always best to include the pertinent information in the body of the first post.  ;) 

  • I found this Informative 2

    Tim    -  VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER

   MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png      PaleoPartner.png.30c01982e09b0cc0b7d9d6a7a21f56c6.png.a600039856933851eeea617ca3f2d15f.png     Postmaster1.jpg.900efa599049929531fa81981f028e24.jpg    VFOTM.png.f1b09c78bf88298b009b0da14ef44cf0.png  VFOTM  --- APRIL - 2015  

__________________________________________________
"In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks."

John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~   ><))))( *>  About Me      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Troodon said:

Possible small fragment of a dorsal spine of shark.

Thanks. My fragment with it's grooves is so small, could it be from newborn?  Excuse my ignorance if this isn't a possibility.

"Journey through a universe ablaze with changes" Phil Ochs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Fossildude19 said:

It is always best to include the pertinent information in the body of the first post.

will do

"Journey through a universe ablaze with changes" Phil Ochs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Innocentx said:

Thanks. My fragment with it's grooves is so small, could it be from newborn?  Excuse my ignorance if this isn't a possibility.

Its so small and not a sharp image difficult to say but cannot rule it out. 

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Fossildude19 said:

Most people overlook the tags, which are designed to make searches more accurate for people searching specific things.

It is always best to include the pertinent information in the body of the first post.  ;) 

I can't get used to them; too old for this newfangled stuff! :blush:
I think that if they were called "Key Words", half the confusion would go away....

  • I found this Informative 4

"There has been an alarming increase in the number of things I know nothing about." - Ashleigh Ellwood Brilliant

“Try to learn something about everything and everything about something.” - Thomas Henry Huxley

>Paleontology is an evolving science.

>May your wonders never cease!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Troodon said:

Possible small fragment of a dorsal spine of shark.

+1

Physonemus, or similar.
It's tiny, but they all started out pretty small.

  • I found this Informative 3

"There has been an alarming increase in the number of things I know nothing about." - Ashleigh Ellwood Brilliant

“Try to learn something about everything and everything about something.” - Thomas Henry Huxley

>Paleontology is an evolving science.

>May your wonders never cease!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Auspex said:

I think that if they were called "Key Words", half the confusion would go away....

Maybe??? I forget to look many times, but am getting better at checking them.

"Journey through a universe ablaze with changes" Phil Ochs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Auspex said:

Physonemus, or similar.
It's tiny, but they all started out pretty small.

"The remains of Permian sharks (290-248 mya) are not unknown from Kansas but are certainly less well known than those from the underlying Pennsylvanian (323-290 mya) rocks. However, it appears that sharks were not evolving rapidly during this 75 million year period and most remains are identifiable from Pennsylvanian species that continue on into the Permian.

Note that the identification of cladodont sharks is somewhat confused at this point.  Most species are based on isolated teeth or dorsal fin spines, not on associated remains.  According to Maisey (pers. comm, 2003), Petalodus teeth and the curved fin spines called Physonemus may be from the same shark. Others have suggested Cladodus teeth and Ctenacanthus dorsal fin spines may be from the same genus. In any case, I am interested in hearing any suggestions on the identifications we have made so far."

 

http://oceansofkansas.com/Paleozoic.html

 

I'm very lucky to have this website as a resource for my state. YES! YES.

ke-039.jpg

ke-014.jpg

  • I found this Informative 4

"Journey through a universe ablaze with changes" Phil Ochs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is cross section of what might be tooth from Cladodus occidentalis found in same general area. Of course I could be wrong but thought you might like to see this fossil in chert. Fossil itself is 2 cm. First photo is from above, second is mine.

curved tooth.JPG

IMG_4227.JPG

"Journey through a universe ablaze with changes" Phil Ochs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another possibility could be actinopterygian tooth.

I've found them and cladodont teeth together in the Hickory Creek shale.

  • I found this Informative 3

Steve

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Bullsnake said:

Another possibility could be actinopterygian tooth.

I've found them and cladodont teeth together in the Hickory Creek shale.

I've found them(cladodont) in Red Eagle formation.

  • I found this Informative 1

"Journey through a universe ablaze with changes" Phil Ochs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Just chiming in, I don't think that's a fin spine, but it could be part of a dermal dentical. I've screenwashed Listracanthus scales that end up looking a bit like that.

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jdp said:

Just chiming in, I don't think that's a fin spine, but it could be part of a dermal dentical. I've screenwashed Listracanthus scales that end up looking a bit like that.

I like your idea and it could be if Listracanthus was in the Permian of Kansas. I haven't located that information yet. Thanks for this.

"Journey through a universe ablaze with changes" Phil Ochs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Innocentx said:

I like your idea and it could be if Listracanthus was in the Permian of Kansas. I haven't located that information yet. Thanks for this.

I've personally collected Listracanthus from Admire and Council Grove groups.

  • I found this Informative 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, jdp said:

I've personally collected Listracanthus from Admire and Council Grove groups.

One of these days I hope to know what to look for in the way of fish parts. Seems like screening may be the only way to find them.

"Journey through a universe ablaze with changes" Phil Ochs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...