Jump to content

Kendall County, Blanco River bottom ID Fossils


Syrian

Recommended Posts

I joined the forum to get some help on IDing the fossils...

They were found in the Blanco River area of eastern Kendall County, Texas.  We find plenty of bi-valves and gastropods on a regular basis.

Most everything we find is from the cretaceous period and makes sense given our ranch location.

I've looked around for several months on the web trying to find something close to these below and can't seem to find anything.

The graph paper is .5 CM squares so most of these are just over an inch long.

IMG_9081.thumb.jpg.43a7fd19fd99d2599bc698655ecdf32e.jpg

IMG_9082.thumb.jpg.e230cf7f1b6cef0996de0b7816507ebc.jpg

I will let the experts give their opinions.

Thanks for your interest!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They look like steinkerns (internal molds) of a highly curved clam (unknown). The marks on the inside of the curve look like impressions of a hinge area. Local experts should be able to give a more specific ID. @Uncle Siphuncle @erose @JohnJ

 

To help us: any idea of what formation they are from?

 

My goal is to leave no stone or fossil unturned.   

See my Arizona Paleontology Guide    link  The best single resource for Arizona paleontology anywhere.       

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They look like rudist steinkerns.  Search TFF and you will find very similar examples.

The human mind has the ability to believe anything is true.  -  JJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't answer your ID  question, but I know an auction site that you can pass them off as dinosaur claws on. :hearty-laugh:

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’d start with rudist steinkern as well.

Grüße,

Daniel A. Wöhr aus Südtexas

"To the motivated go the spoils."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Internal casts of Rudists?  :unsure: 

 

@JohnJ @erose  @Uncle Siphuncle  @BobWill

    Tim    -  VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER

   MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png      PaleoPartner.png.30c01982e09b0cc0b7d9d6a7a21f56c6.png.a600039856933851eeea617ca3f2d15f.png     Postmaster1.jpg.900efa599049929531fa81981f028e24.jpg    VFOTM.png.f1b09c78bf88298b009b0da14ef44cf0.png  VFOTM  --- APRIL - 2015  

__________________________________________________
"In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks."

John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~   ><))))( *>  About Me      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, JohnJ said:

They look like rudist steinkerns.  Search TFF and you will find very similar examples.

I think this is a duplicate thread because I just answered the same question/pictures on a different one.

Darwin said: " Man sprang from monkeys."

Will Rogers said: " Some of them didn't spring far enough."

 

My Fossil collection - My Mineral collection

My favorite thread on TFF.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

15 minutes ago, ynot said:

I think this is a duplicate thread because I just answered the same question/pictures on a different one.

Threads merged. 

    Tim    -  VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER

   MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png      PaleoPartner.png.30c01982e09b0cc0b7d9d6a7a21f56c6.png.a600039856933851eeea617ca3f2d15f.png     Postmaster1.jpg.900efa599049929531fa81981f028e24.jpg    VFOTM.png.f1b09c78bf88298b009b0da14ef44cf0.png  VFOTM  --- APRIL - 2015  

__________________________________________________
"In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks."

John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~   ><))))( *>  About Me      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since I have little experience with rudists (or curved clams or claws or skulls:) my 1st thought would be very worn whorl sections of ammonites but they would have to be fairly evolute and from the body chamber unless they were some of the rare phragmocone pieces without septa or suture showing. Is that too vague? lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My first thought was also rudist steinkerns, but what puzzles me is, that all have nearly the same curvature. No, wrong, not all have the same curvature...

Btw, the small squares are 1 mm large? Then most specimens are a little bit over 1 cm lage, about 1/2 inch.

Franz Bernhard

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You do not close your thread. It remains open unless an administrator or moderator finds a problem and: hides it; locks it to further replies; or deletes the whole thing.

My goal is to leave no stone or fossil unturned.   

See my Arizona Paleontology Guide    link  The best single resource for Arizona paleontology anywhere.       

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Leaving it open allows future people to learn from the thread, in this way the forum becomes a sort of open encyclopedia that stores information for those in the future, while continuously creating new content.

“...whilst this planet has gone cycling on according to the fixed law of gravity, from so simple a beginning endless forms most beautiful and most wonderful have been and are being evolved.” ~ Charles Darwin

Happy hunting,

Mason

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...