Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hello I present an interesting question that I'm not to confident to answer myself and am seeking help from the more knowledgeable. Since it seems like (from what I had seen) iron concretions can at rare times preserve certain fossils or traces in one way or another such as molluscs, brachopods, and such. Due to this would it be possible for material such as turtle shell scutes or maybe even croc scutes to turn up in such concretions in one way or another? (the pics are just snipets of general info that I came across online)

IMG_20180826_155951403_BURST001.jpg

IMG_20180826_155945277.jpg

IMG_20180826_155310333.jpg

IMG_20180826_154737613.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, bones can occur in ironstone. In North Texas mainly shelly carbonate fossils in ironstone are common. If bones occur along with the shells than the bones end up in the ironstone.

  • I found this Informative 1

My goal is to leave no stone or fossil unturned.   

See my Arizona Paleontology Guide    link  The best single resource for Arizona paleontology anywhere.       

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think almost anything could be preserved in iron stone, concretion or otherwise. I have found pet wood in the Eocene. I have found ferns, calamities and other plant material in Carboniferous iron stone concretions. I have also found shells and crinoid pieces in them.

I am not sure if all Mazon fossils from concretions are considered iron stone, but some definitely are. Their diversity is extensive.

  • I found this Informative 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

@DPS Ammonite @KimTexan Thank you very much for the info, this is the piece that started my questioning that I found in one in a spot described to have marine cretaceous material in it I also found one of a soft shell turtle, it looked to way to suspicious to dismiss automatically. Since that is the case it would be safe to consider this as a scute fossil?

IMG_20180826_173856871.jpg

IMG_20180826_173816209.jpg

IMG_20180826_173751872.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...
On 8/26/2018 at 5:50 PM, Ryann10006 said:

@DPS Ammonite @KimTexan Thank you very much for the info, this is the piece that started my questioning that I found in one in a spot described to have marine cretaceous material in it I also found one of a soft shell turtle, it looked to way to suspicious to dismiss automatically. Since that is the case it would be safe to consider this as a scute fossil?

IMG_20180826_173856871.jpg  IMG_20180826_173816209.jpg IMG_20180826_173751872.jpg


Those look like concretions 

“You must take your opponent into a deep dark forest where 2+2=5, and the path leading out is only wide enough for one.” ― Mikhail Tal

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...