Jump to content

Otherwiseunseen

Recommended Posts

Hi, I'm new here. I am an amateur collector. I found these two bones in Big Brook NJ and I'm really excited. Can anyone shed some light? 

20180830_211933.jpg

20180830_211909.jpg

IMG_20180830_222345_445.jpg

IMG_20180830_222345_446.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry but it looks suspiciously like a humerus from a modern deer.

If you head out before it's fully light, like I commonly do, a big buck giving an alarm call (blow) can startle the begebers out of you. :) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Welcome to The Fossil Forum!

 

To find out whether these bones are modern or fossil, you should try out the flame test. Set a lighter/matches to the piece, and see if it smells.

If it smells very bad, then it's modern. The bad smell is due to the collagen in the bones burning, a substance that goes away during fossilization.

If nothing happens, then it's most likely fossil!

 

Best regards,

 

Max

  • I found this Informative 2

Max Derème

 

"I feel an echo of the lightning each time I find a fossil. [...] That is why I am a hunter: to feel that bolt of lightning every day."

   - Mary Anning >< Remarkable Creatures, Tracy Chevalier

 

Instagram: @world_of_fossils

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Otherwiseunseen said:

If it is a fossil and I put a flame to it, will it damage the specimen?

Most likely not, it is a commonly used test for bone/fossil.

Darwin said: " Man sprang from monkeys."

Will Rogers said: " Some of them didn't spring far enough."

 

My Fossil collection - My Mineral collection

My favorite thread on TFF.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Max-fossils said:

Welcome to The Fossil Forum!

 

To find out whether these bones are modern or fossil, you should try out the flame test. Set a lighter/matches to the piece, and see if it smells.

If it smells very bad, then it's modern. The bad smell is due to the collagen in the bones burning, a substance that goes away during fossilization.

If nothing happens, then it's most likely fossil!

 

Best regards,

 

Max

What is the maximum age a bone needs to be to be considered modern? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Rockwood said:

Sorry but it looks suspiciously like a humerus from a modern deer.

If you head out before it's fully light, like I commonly do, a big buck giving an alarm call (blow) can startle the begebers out of you. :) 

I know! I've been charged by a buck once. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Otherwiseunseen said:

What is the maximum age a bone needs to be to be considered modern? 

Typically anything less than 10,000 years is considered modern, but it is kinda subjective.

  • I found this Informative 1

Darwin said: " Man sprang from monkeys."

Will Rogers said: " Some of them didn't spring far enough."

 

My Fossil collection - My Mineral collection

My favorite thread on TFF.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Otherwiseunseen said:

It's got to be ancient though. 

I think Pleistocene bones do show up in the brooks sometimes. It really doesn't take long for bones to become stained dark though.

Being cooked, or the remains thrown in a campfire can foul the burn test. The fracturing on it would make me wonder if this could be the case.

You might also try a tap test. The sound it makes when lightly tapped with something like a spoon will be high pitched as that made by fine china if it is mineralized. It will sound lower pitched if it is modern bone.

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Otherwiseunseen said:

And I did a flame test, it just smells like heat. No foul odor 

In that case there is a big chance it's fossil! :ighappy:

1 hour ago, Otherwiseunseen said:

What is the maximum age a bone needs to be to be considered modern? 

Well, it really depends. As Tony said 10'000 years is more or less the boundary, but sometimes you'll have bones older than that which aren't fossilized yet (and therefore still modern), and you can also have fossils which are slightly younger than that too. So it just depends on the specimen in question. 

Some people use the term "sub-fossil", for things that are not yet fully fossilized but still too old to be modern, or things in which the fossilization process isn't fully finished, but that term is mostly frowned upon (especially by scientists) for its vagueness and inaccuracy. 

  • I found this Informative 1

Max Derème

 

"I feel an echo of the lightning each time I find a fossil. [...] That is why I am a hunter: to feel that bolt of lightning every day."

   - Mary Anning >< Remarkable Creatures, Tracy Chevalier

 

Instagram: @world_of_fossils

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lithification should not be confused with fossilization. I read just recently that lithification of fecal matter can take as little as a few weeks in some cases.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Rockwood said:

Lithification should not be confused with fossilization. I read just recently that lithification of fecal matter can take as little as a few weeks in some cases.

Maybe the contents of decal matter are variables in the rate of lithification. 

Does this bone have any significance? It's like believing I've found gold but it's really pyrite. Or thinking I found meteorite but it's really iron ore. I found a fool's fossil? Hahaha

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Otherwiseunseen said:

Maybe the contents of decal matter are variables in the rate of lithification. 

Does this bone have any significance? It's like believing I've found gold but it's really pyrite. Or thinking I found meteorite but it's really iron ore. I found a fool's fossil? Hahaha

There are many folks on here who are far more experienced with the area that you should wait to hear from.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Rockwood said:

Lithification should not be confused with fossilization. I read just recently that lithification of fecal matter can take as little as a few weeks in some cases.

Cow patties? :headscratch:

Everything is generated through your own will power ~ Ray Bradbury
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Walt said:

Cow patties? :headscratch:

Well, you are likely to encounter them on the way, but the book was discussing coprolites in the green river formation. It was given more as a concept than an example, but it does explain the three dimensional nature of the fossils.

I also meant it as a concept to perhaps help explain the difficulty that is encountered when attempting to distinguish old bones from fossil bones. 

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

These are both modern bones (not Cretaceous or Pleistocene).

  • I found this Informative 1

“You must take your opponent into a deep dark forest where 2+2=5, and the path leading out is only wide enough for one.” ― Mikhail Tal

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Otherwiseunseen said:

I looked up deer humerus and, yes, it's definitely close if not a deer. It's got to be ancient though. 

20180901_101009.jpg

Modern deer bone. Very common in the brooks. It looks ancient because the iron in the water stains them.

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Woopaul5 said:

Modern deer bone. Very common in the brooks. It looks ancient because the iron in the water stains them.

Ahhh, shucks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here’s a modern jaw I found. I usually run into a piece every trip now. I usually joke to people and say I dug up Jimmy Hoffa. 

 

Keep at it and you’ll find pleistocene stuff eventually. 

80CFFD44-93DF-42E2-969A-2FA0298B5246.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...