Jump to content

Weird stuff from nc


Wolf89

Recommended Posts

First one I would say is a piece of ray mouth plate (one of the corners). 

Second one I have no clue whatsoever.

 

Providing a better picture of the second one (take it on a flat surface, with a size scale, and adequate lighting, and make sure that the specimen is in focus) would probably be good.

Also, giving a more precise location than NC might be useful too. 

  • I found this Informative 2

Max Derème

 

"I feel an echo of the lightning each time I find a fossil. [...] That is why I am a hunter: to feel that bolt of lightning every day."

   - Mary Anning >< Remarkable Creatures, Tracy Chevalier

 

Instagram: @world_of_fossils

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They almost look lethal in the closeup's.. 

  • I found this Informative 2

Accomplishing the impossible means only that the boss will add it to your regular duties.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The first one is part of a ray tooth. Aetobatus sp. most likely. The second one I do believe is fish and is probably recent.

  • I found this Informative 2

Bulldozers and dirt Bulldozers and dirt
behind the trailer, my desert
Them red clay piles are heaven on earth
I get my rocks off, bulldozers and dirt

Patterson Hood; Drive-By Truckers

 

image.png.0c956e87cee523facebb6947cb34e842.png May 2016  MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png.a47e14d65deb3f8b242019b3a81d8160.png.b42a25e3438348310ba19ce6852f50c1.png May 2012 IPFOTM5.png.fb4f2a268e315c58c5980ed865b39e1f.png.1721b8912c45105152ac70b0ae8303c3.png.2b6263683ee32421d97e7fa481bd418a.pngAug 2013, May 2016, Apr 2020 VFOTM.png.f1b09c78bf88298b009b0da14ef44cf0.png.af5065d0585e85f4accd8b291bf0cc2e.png.72a83362710033c9bdc8510be7454b66.png.9171036128e7f95de57b6a0f03c491da.png Oct 2022

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The second pair of specimens are fish opercula (Gill covers).  I don't recognize the species right off but they should be identifiable.  I don't know why people seem so sure they are modern.

 

Don

  • I found this Informative 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, FossilDAWG said:

I don't know why people seem so sure they are modern.

Perhaps because the preservation here is almost too good to be true for such a delicate item. How old would this be?

 

"Journey through a universe ablaze with changes" Phil Ochs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, FossilDAWG said:

The second pair of specimens are fish opercula (Gill covers).  I don't recognize the species right off but they should be identifiable.  I don't know why people seem so sure they are modern.

 

Don

Ahh thats what it is!

They might be mondern, they are rather brittle.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Innocentx said:

Perhaps because the preservation here is almost too good to be true for such a delicate item. How old would this be?

 

yorktown/duplin formation, 2.5 - 60 millions years ago. 

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...