Jump to content

Gen. et sp. indet.

Recommended Posts

Two colonies found today in central Poland. Erratic boulders, so no data available other than this: Ordovician or Silurian, Baltica.

Is there an easy way to distinguish between various 'monticuliporid' taxa actually placed in different trepostome families?

IMAG7820_1.thumb.jpg.b6de042a7cd36853699fdd816106ff0e.jpg

IMAG7805_1.thumb.jpg.9743ec747e2dd6c8e7a8eb6bb7e6fc24.jpg

 

Smaller specimen:

IMAG7861_1.thumb.jpg.a994e1f1331c7c79d6f017016790f4a2.jpg

IMAG7859_1.thumb.jpg.26ed9fe57866d86776095d3d537456f0.jpg

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's an absolute nightmare of taxonomy and morphology. 

You really have to be an expert which i'm rather afraid I'm not. 

And without knowing the exact horizon it would become near impossible, I would say.

Sorry. :(

Life's Good!

Tortoise Friend.

MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png.a47e14d65deb3f8b242019b3a81d8160-1.png.60b8b8c07f6fa194511f8b7cfb7cc190.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tidgy's Dad said:

It's an absolute nightmare of taxonomy and morphology. 

You really have to be an expert which i'm rather afraid I'm not. 

And without knowing the exact horizon it would become near impossible, I would say.

Sorry. :(

Sorry then! You were the first person to come to mind though. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Wrangellian said:

@Spongy Joe has some knowledge of Bryo's too, doesn't he? except I haven't seen him around lately, maybe others have?

Has not been onsite since mid july.

Darwin said: " Man sprang from monkeys."

Will Rogers said: " Some of them didn't spring far enough."

 

My Fossil collection - My Mineral collection

My favorite thread on TFF.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, piranha said:

These look like tabulate corals.  

The third photo definitely looks like a tabulate.

I'm not sure the larger piece is preserved well enough to be identified.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

do you perchance mean something like this:

2f5666tyyy774ett77archime44e5tmedtr2m35pltwillist.jpg

 

possibly?("Ordovician erratic Bryozoa of Poland/1962")

about 5,5 Mb,and might contain obsolete taxonomy 

 

there are biometrical(stereometrical) criteria available for species discrimination,btw

(below,image from Jimenez-Sanchez/Geodiversitas,2010),should be in several libraries here

 

2f5666tyyy774ett77archime44e5tmedtr2m35pltwillist.jpg

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, doushantuo said:

 

Thanks! I've got all these papers now and will read them. Unfortunately, it seems clear now, without cut samples and much knowledge, I won't be able to ID the colonies. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For the (on genera-level) comparable ordovician baltic province bryozoa I use "Bassler 1911 The early Paleozoic Bryozoa of the Baltic Provinces": old, but still very usable (and with very good and instructive pictures). Ways better than Kiepura 1962.

 

@ Rockwood: treptostomate bryozoa often look like "mini-tabulata" on the first view , but when you have a closer look (and a very good preparated or plane-polished surface) there are significant differences in microstructure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...