Jump to content

Ammonites from Somerset, UK


Aurelius

Recommended Posts

Went out on a hunting trip at the weekend, and came away with quite a few decent finds. These are all in-land finds from locations near Ilminster, and the finds are all from the Toarcian pediod (182-174m years ago).

 

Please forgive me having forgotten most of the names of the ammonites, I'm not great at remembering them.

This ammonite, a Dactylioceras of some kind, is covered in clay which is absolutely full of what appear to be trace fossils from worm activity. This isn't uncommon, but I've rarely seen such a vivid example.

 

_PCB5752.thumb.jpg.b04a411b207680d6cebfaa1e32268a48.jpg

 

Close up:

 

_PCB5753.thumb.jpg.160fd3143785cd72c2c655783515af63.jpg

 

The rear of this large, crushed harpoceras is a jumble of mixed up fossil bits, which you often find in the various layers of the beacon limestone. Top left there is quite an interesting bit of shell, which looks as if it might perhaps be part of a crushed teuthid phragmocone. 

_PCB5755.thumb.jpg.ba0c7d0788d47debaf3f7894d4328db7.jpg

 

A nice little double-dac.

 

_PCB5758.thumb.jpg.6db53d7ab5f1f0b7d07e955dc9cb8870.jpg

 

This is one of the scarcer ammonites from this location (I've forgotten the name), especially at this large size. I have one or two locations I can go to and stand a chance of finding these. They are often heavily re-worked, and this specimen was obviously exposed after fossilisation and heavily rolled on the seabed. It's structurally sound, but the shell - which seems to have been originally preserved - has been almost completely worn away. Such a shame!

 

_PCB5761.thumb.jpg.e9656acbff94aa8db09e2a207a7a3d61.jpg

 

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I found this harpoceras in-situ (normally they are found loose).

_PCB5764.thumb.jpg.49711bf916fe2b9f2c4249175c280022.jpg

 

These (some sort of hildoceras I think) are very common and can be found in absolutely perfect condition. This is a rather average example.

 

_PCB5767.thumb.jpg.9213ef7a7d597b1f7af93cb30ec3aef3.jpg

 

This one illustrates the jumbled nature of the material often found here.

 

_PCB5768.thumb.jpg.38397b957b5ca4caff2e27b3b1a124e1.jpg

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20180910_174513.thumb.jpg.d3216b62a8beaf23eb9dfa5d52d123bb.jpg

 

20180910_174526.thumb.jpg.f7dde3e00301c9485fcd4e02284cbd1a.jpg

 

This is a nice big one - it'll take some prep with the air pen and the air abrader. If the centre is complete, it should look nice. The rock here often has a lot of iron in it, and this sometimes seems to eat into the ammonites, leaving big holes. This one looks OK, at least superficially.

 

20180910_174701.thumb.jpg.1f8dc1242eabb46855e5943788bb481e.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cheating now, because I found this big block around six weeks ago. If I expose the ammonite properly, it might be an attractive piece. 

 

_PCB5771.thumb.jpg.b1d4507a46b12c79dc97d2f36fbc690a.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for sharing these things.  Although the fauna is familiar, it's not very often that you see them from this area. It's interesting to see how different the preservation is compared to the ones to be found on the Yorkshire coast, southwest Germany or central France. Depositional and taphonomic circumstances play a major role in creating the differences. Apparently the Junction Bed, where I'm assuming these were found, is a condensed sequence which squeezes 4 million years into less than one meter of rock down at the Jurassic coast, whereas the same timescale is represented in Yorkshire by 100 meters of black shale.

  • I found this Informative 4

 

Greetings from the Lake of Constance. Roger

http://www.steinkern.de/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Ludwigia said:

Thanks for sharing these things.  Although the fauna is familiar, it's not very often that you see them from this area. It's interesting to see how different the preservation is compared to the ones to be found on the Yorkshire coast, southwest Germany or central France. Depositional and taphonomic circumstances play a major role in creating the differences. Apparently the Junction Bed, where I'm assuming these were found, is a condensed sequence which squeezes 4 million years into less than one meter of rock down at the Jurassic coast, whereas the same timescale is represented in Yorkshire by 100 meters of black shale.

 

Yes, it is the Junction Bed, or the Beacon Limestone as it's now known. In the area where I collect, the rock is around 5 meters thick, so it is still heavily condensed. There is a lot of re-working and weathering too, although some beautiful examples can be found. Unfortunately, unlike in Yorkshire, there are no bones to be found, nor any evidence of vertebrate animals whatsoever (although I do have some possible fragments of hybodont fin spines)

  • I found this Informative 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Love that piece with the ichnofossils. Good to display as is. Interesting about the difference in sequence thickness.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...