Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Here is another rock from a middle Tennessee creek. (Mississippian, St. Louis Limestone & Warsaw Limestone) It is full of tiny brachiopods, bryozoan bits and maybe a few other fossils. I would like to have the area circled in red identified. 

0D2286E0-B8D9-45DD-A701-E2769621B597.jpeg

EB1E4BC2-79FA-4913-9109-020FA6869568.jpeg

49DE7DAC-EEE8-4A50-8FA2-FFB1C8CF8019.jpeg

F05D00A4-75B8-4A8C-8088-C14B000C7D76.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The red circled area looks like part of an oyster shell. 

277_IMG_1151.jpg

  • I found this Informative 2

Accomplishing the impossible means only that the boss will add it to your regular duties.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Neat hash plate. The circled area looks like a fragment from something oyster-like given the undulation of the plications.

 

Image from MyRockhound.com for comparison:

 

277_IMG_1151.JPG

  • I found this Informative 2

...How to Philosophize with a Hammer

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Kane said:

Neat hash plate. The circled area looks like a fragment from something oyster-like given the undulation of the plications.

 

Image from MyRockhound.com for comparison:

 

277_IMG_1151.JPG

HA! Beat ya' by 1 minute, and with the same pic no less! :hearty-laugh:

  • I found this Informative 1

Accomplishing the impossible means only that the boss will add it to your regular duties.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, it IS almost Halloween.. :muahaha:

Accomplishing the impossible means only that the boss will add it to your regular duties.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just to add to it, both pics are from the same site. I googled oyster shell fossil, saw that one & grabbed it. But I'm not sure about the "great minds" part... have you met my mind? :blink:

Accomplishing the impossible means only that the boss will add it to your regular duties.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This seems like a good match! But were oyster-like bivs already around during the Mississippian?
Franz Bernhard

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, FranzBernhard said:

This seems like a good match! But were oyster-like bivs already around during the Mississippian?
Franz Bernhard

:headscratch:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Bobby Rico said:

Great material to try out  your macro lens.

I’m still working on holding my iPhone perfectly still, and experimenting with different lighting when indoors. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, BLT said:

I’m still working on holding my iPhone perfectly still, and experimenting with different lighting when indoors. 

Try resting you arms on the table to steadys your hands . Looks like you may see some interesting shapes in this piece.

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s an interesting little rock with a medley of fossil bits in it. I’ve enjoyed studying it through my macro lens. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BLT said:

It’s an interesting little rock with a medley of fossil bits in it. I’ve enjoyed studying it through my macro lens. :)

Hash plates are my favourite to photograph. Very interesting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, FranzBernhard said:

This seems like a good match! But were oyster-like bivs already around during the Mississippian?
Franz Bernhard

There are no oyster-like shells in the Mississippian. I think that a pectinoid with pronounced ribs and growth rings is possible. It also cound be a brachiopod.

  • I found this Informative 2

My goal is to leave no stone or fossil unturned.   

See my Arizona Paleontology Guide    link  The best single resource for Arizona paleontology anywhere.       

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Rockwood said:

I can't quite shake my first impression of a trilobite molt. 

Funny! That was my first impression, too.

 

6 hours ago, DPS Ammonite said:

I think that a pectinoid with pronounced ribs and growth rings is possible. It also cound be a brachiopod.

Good suggestions! Maybe someone here on the forum has reference material/photos of such Mississippian fossils?

Franz Bernhard

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...