Jump to content

Help IDing fossil


PastaP

Recommended Posts

I have no experience IDing fossils but found this one on a trail we hike with our dog daily. The location has lots of flat rocks just at the surface or under. The area is part of the St Lawrence lowlands. 

 

Thanks!

DFADA296-F898-4F9E-B2D1-AEB89553075D.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did some reading. I was using baculite and orthocerus as synonyms, but that would be akin to saying a ammonite and nautilus are the same. Also they existed in different time periods. So uncoiled cephalopod or one of the above is a safer answer. 

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is a straight-shelled (= orthocerid) nautiloid in the genus Actinoceras.  These nautiloids had a large siphuncle (the tube structure up the middle) and camerae (chambers on the sides) filled with dense secondary deposits.  This weighted the shell, and it is thought that the actinocerids were predators that prowled the sea floor (sort of like modern octopuses), in contrast to other nautiloids that had shells without deposits and were active pelagic swimming predators (sort of like modern squid).  These fossils are common in some of the more massive Ordovician limestone formations (such as the Gull River) in southern Ontario and the Ottawa area.

 

Don

  • I found this Informative 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...