Jump to content

Coral (5) from the Campanian St. Bartholomä formation, Styria, Austria (Gosau group, Eastern Alps)


FranzBernhard

Recommended Posts

Hello,

here I am again with a recently (10/14/2018) found coral colony from the Campanian St. Bartholomä-formation in Styria, Austria (Gosau-group). Its very poorly preserved and I have only very little hopes that it is possible to assign a genus to it. I don´t think its an Actinastrea, it seems more like a Barysmilia (according to Baron-Szabo, 2014), but I am really clueless.

First pic is a polished part of the specimen. Preservation is very poor.

Second pic is the "upper" surface, its strongly worn, only the position of the corallites can be seen, with some occasional septa. The polished area is located at the bottom.

Third pic is an oblique side view. The specimen measures about 10 cm in its longest dimension.

Worn-down corallites can be found all around the specimen.

Thank you very much for your patience, help and opinions!
Franz Bernhard

AN_Koralle_38_AN4113.jpg

Koralle_38_AN4113_a_kompr.jpg

Koralle_38_AN4113_b_kompr.jpg

  • I found this Informative 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would need a better image of the polished section, a closer view. It looks at the first glance being Barysmilia BUT dimensions are fare too small for this genus. So please, a more closer look. 

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks, Hans!

Oh, this pic is not expandable, I have uploaded a resized pic, sorry!

Here is a larger one, with original resolution of 1200 dpi (contrast enhanced, sharpend, little bit compressed).

This specimen has a very low contrast and this is the best I can do.

Have also checked scale bar, is ok!

Thanks again!
Franz Bernhard

AN_Koralle_38_AN4113_b.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Yes, things are clearer now. Look the picture below. Darker grey=coral substance. It is a hydnophoroid form. There are actually only two genera, Hydnophoraraea and Synhydnophora. The last one was just recently described as new (http://www.bioone.org/doi/pdf/10.18476/pale.11.a7). They differ in their septal structure, hardly to see in your image.

 

 

AN4113_C.JPG

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hans,

thank you very much for your help and the link to this paper. Never ending diversity!

Franz Bernhard

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most of these newly described taxa are well known, but not recognised being different. For instance Paractinacis is a common genus but species were always assigned to Actinacis. If people would have made longitudinal sections, they would have easily recognised  that there are differences.

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...