hndmarshall Posted November 18, 2018 Share Posted November 18, 2018 possible branch impression? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hndmarshall Posted November 18, 2018 Author Share Posted November 18, 2018 now that I see the pics here larger possibly not Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fossildude19 Posted November 18, 2018 Share Posted November 18, 2018 I would have to say no - this is geological in origin - not a fossil. Tim - VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER VFOTM --- APRIL - 2015 __________________________________________________ "In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks." John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~ ><))))( *> About Me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tidgy's Dad Posted November 18, 2018 Share Posted November 18, 2018 Weird shaped piece of chert, methinks. Life's Good! Tortoise Friend. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeepTimeIsotopes Posted November 18, 2018 Share Posted November 18, 2018 Probably not Each dot is 50,000,000 years: Hadean............Archean..............................Proterozoic.......................................Phanerozoic........... Paleo......Meso....Ceno.. Ꞓ.OSD.C.P.Tr.J.K..Pg.NgQ< You are here Doesn't time just fly by? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ynot Posted November 18, 2018 Share Posted November 18, 2018 Natural erosion shape, not a print. Darwin said: " Man sprang from monkeys." Will Rogers said: " Some of them didn't spring far enough." My Fossil collection - My Mineral collection My favorite thread on TFF. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.