Jump to content

Fossil bone?


David Kite

Recommended Posts

Hi! I have what I believe to be a fossil bone. I'm guessing it's a bone due to its structure, and not just a rock, and I'm guessing it's a fossil and not modern because it appears to have mineralized. Location of find is Parke County, Indiana just outside of Rockville. Whatever its back story, unfortunately when I found it, it was resting alone in topsoil, and I found it while walking in my horse pasture (which I understand is a huge red flag, but it is not, as far as I can tell, a rock or modern bone). It's possible we unearthed it, because we had spent a couple years uprooting a pasture full of multiflora rose, so its resting state had already been disturbed before I found it. It's been on a shelf for the last 15-20 years, so my recollection of how rocky the soil was where I found it may be hazy.

 

I have several photos to post. Please let me know if you need more or better ones.

 

Anyway, thanks for your help in advance.

David Kite

fossil1.jpg

fossil2.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would wager that this is a fossilized rugose coral with clearly evident septae present on the ends. Cancellous bone material would look more porous and "spongy" by comparison. If I'm not mistaken about the geology, the area in which you found this is quite rich in Paleozoic deposits. 

 

A simplified geologic bedrock map of your state:

 

about1.jpg

  • I found this Informative 4

...How to Philosophize with a Hammer

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice Rugose coral.  :) 

    Tim    -  VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER

   MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png      PaleoPartner.png.30c01982e09b0cc0b7d9d6a7a21f56c6.png.a600039856933851eeea617ca3f2d15f.png     Postmaster1.jpg.900efa599049929531fa81981f028e24.jpg    VFOTM.png.f1b09c78bf88298b009b0da14ef44cf0.png  VFOTM  --- APRIL - 2015  

__________________________________________________
"In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks."

John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~   ><))))( *>  About Me      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Ludwigia said:

It was "budding" at the time.

Thanks for that suggestion. It put me on the trail where I found this interesting 1981 thesis of a Thomas B. Rich. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=6847&context=etd

Here I found his theory of sedimentation as a cause for growth disruption (page 118) and thought you might be interested.

 

5bfeec671288f_coralgrowth.JPG.7e9d1198c9ec6f777a02731fbb33f02e.JPG5bfeec711d287_coralgrowth2.JPG.6fd866f032119761aa136b9c7a48520c.JPG

 

  • I found this Informative 2

"Journey through a universe ablaze with changes" Phil Ochs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cool. Thanks for your input, everyone. So if it was "budding" when it died, does that mean that the larger end should be on top and I've had the poor thing upside down all this time?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, David Kite said:

Cool. Thanks for your input, everyone. So if it was "budding" when it died, does that mean that the larger end should be on top and I've had the poor thing upside down all this time?

 

 

Yes and you should feel terrible about it... :hearty-laugh:

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...