Jump to content

New Zealand cave fossil ID


Chris Breeze

Recommended Posts

We were exploring Abbey Caves in Whareora, Northland New Zealand and my daughter spotted a strange shape in the cave stream and looking closer it looked like a fossil. I look a picture with my phone. Can anyone give us a name for this? Cheers

99D80AB9-3DC1-4F23-9C29-1BBC83F5B553.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok thanks Ludwigia for the quick reply.

So it’s just sea shell right? What sort of date are we looking at?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Ludwigia said:

Looks like it might be part of a cone trapped in sinter. I think I see other plant material round about it

I think Ludwigia is on to something here.   and yeah, I agree.   Needs some prep though to uncover the rest?

 

RB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Chris Breeze said:

So it’s just sea shell right?

Not a seashell, a conifer seed cone.

And I agree with a seed cone.

  • I found this Informative 1

Darwin said: " Man sprang from monkeys."

Will Rogers said: " Some of them didn't spring far enough."

 

My Fossil collection - My Mineral collection

My favorite thread on TFF.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice cone and good spotting by your daughter. This should look great after a little prep work.

"Journey through a universe ablaze with changes" Phil Ochs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Definitely it's a cone. Maybe something known as "kauri" (Agathis) or other araucarian?

  • I found this Informative 1

" We are not separate and independent entities, but like links in a chain, and we could not by any means be what we are without those who went before us and showed us the way. "

Thomas Mann

My Library

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with the ID as a plant cone.  I don't know if it is legal to remove objects from caves in New Zealand; it is not in the USA.  Also the OP posted a photo taken in situ, and did not say anything about having collected the specimen.  I don't think we will see photos "after preparation" as this would require removal from the cave, which may well be illegal.

 

Don

  • I found this Informative 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, FossilDAWG said:

I don't think we will see photos "after preparation"

Too bad. The replacement material looks awesome.

"Journey through a universe ablaze with changes" Phil Ochs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Innocentx said:

Too bad. The replacement material looks awesome.

Do to the location (and the leaf just above it) I think it is relatively recent and carbonised.

  • I found this Informative 1

Darwin said: " Man sprang from monkeys."

Will Rogers said: " Some of them didn't spring far enough."

 

My Fossil collection - My Mineral collection

My favorite thread on TFF.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ynot said:

Do to the location (and the leaf just above it) I think it is relatively recent and carbonised.

I think you are right. 

 

I really like your photo @Chris Breeze.  Probably a bit tough in a cave.

"Journey through a universe ablaze with changes" Phil Ochs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/14/2019 at 10:06 AM, Innocentx said:

Nice cone and good spotting by your daughter. This should look great after a little prep work.

 

On 1/14/2019 at 10:05 AM, ynot said:

Not a seashell, a conifer seed cone.

And I agree with a seed cone.

 

On 1/14/2019 at 5:21 PM, Innocentx said:

I think you are right. 

 

I really like your photo @Chris Breeze.  Probably a bit tough in a cave.

Thanks everyone for your expertise. It was a nice find. Yes native Kauri trees were prevalent in the area and can exist past 1000 years old, plus the cones produced seem the right size (7cm) for the fossil. Unfortunately, like the poster above mentioned, it would seem improper to remove it from the cave so best left where it is. Cheers

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/13/2019 at 11:22 PM, Chris Breeze said:

 Can anyone give us a name for this?

 

19 hours ago, Chris Breeze said:

Yes native Kauri trees were prevalent in the area and can exist past 1000 years old, plus the cones produced seem the right size (7cm) for the fossil.

 

Thank you for the confirmation! :)

" We are not separate and independent entities, but like links in a chain, and we could not by any means be what we are without those who went before us and showed us the way. "

Thomas Mann

My Library

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...