Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Just ordred a kind of "cheap" and not so well prepped and maybe enhanced keichousaurus. Would be nice to get some opinions about the condition of this fossil. I know I should ask before buying but the financial damage isnt that bad and I`m quite cuurious about this fossil. 

 

Will be pretty interesting to compare it with my other keichosaurus, which was my first ever fossile and a few times more expensive beeing from triassica.

5c64847f97749_s-l1600(1).thumb.jpg.2b053fde62c1d39bfed7d1a3e3af110b.jpg

s-l1600 (2).jpg

s-l1600 (4).jpg

s-l1600 (5).jpg

IMG_4897.JPG

s-l1600.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok I think  talking about the first specimen but it is really hard to be 100% when photos are not the best.  It looks to have painted feet and not the best prepped. I think when you get it better picture will help. The second one is pretty nice indeed. Sorry can’t help any more than that. Cheers Bobby 

  • I found this Informative 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A bunch of the ribs look painted as well, I'd also like to see what the experts have to say.

  • I found this Informative 2

Life started in the ocean. And so did my interest in fossils;).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Closer pictures with with better lighting would help to tell what it is.

  • I found this Informative 2

Life started in the ocean. And so did my interest in fossils;).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This does indeed look poorly prepped, and largely painted over. 

 

sReverseb.jpg

 

 

s-l1600.thumb.jpg.3d4ee51ccca4a554675120326ed3b71f.jpg 

 

 

The item Bobby is asking about could be excess paint, coprolite, or bones of a meal or evidence of live young still in the womb. 

 

  • I found this Informative 4

    Tim    -  VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER

   MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png      PaleoPartner.png.30c01982e09b0cc0b7d9d6a7a21f56c6.png.a600039856933851eeea617ca3f2d15f.png     Postmaster1.jpg.900efa599049929531fa81981f028e24.jpg    VFOTM.png.f1b09c78bf88298b009b0da14ef44cf0.png  VFOTM  --- APRIL - 2015  

__________________________________________________
"In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks."

John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~   ><))))( *>  About Me      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Fossildude19 said:

The item Bobby is asking about could be excess paint, coprolite, or bones of a meal or evidence of live young still in the womb. 

Thanks Tim it is always in the same place. So I don’t think is paint but possibly coprolite or live young in the womb. Same on mine but not clear

 

592C34C9-FCE7-41D7-B630-DE4634BE7EB3.jpeg

  • I found this Informative 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't think there is a whole lot of paint on these. Interestingly, both have the lower half of their tails missing and carved out of matrix. I think if there was paint on these specimens, they would have painted the carved portions of the tail. You would need to remove more matrix between the ribs to tell what the black material is. As already mentioned, poorly prepped with acid.

  • I found this Informative 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, steelhead9 said:

Don't think there is a whole lot of paint on these. Interestingly, both have the lower half of their tails missing and carved out of matrix. I think if there was paint on these specimens, they would have painted the carved portions of the tail. You would need to remove more matrix between the ribs to tell what the black material is. As already mentioned, poorly prepped with acid.

They don't just paint what they have carved out. But better pictures could determine more.

  • I found this Informative 1

Life started in the ocean. And so did my interest in fossils;).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is the contorted creature's head not between the red lines I added below, as opposed to the previously cited green marks? I think I am seeing the end of its snoot at the upper red line.

 

khead.jpg.166fe9ab11630c2a5929053ae6b9c085.jpg

 

  • I found this Informative 3

Human beings, who are almost unique in having the ability to learn from the experience of others, also are remarkable for their apparent disinclination to do so. - Douglas Adams, Last Chance to See

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Both are genuine specimens of Keichousaurus, acid prepped.  I don't think the first specimen is painted. The second specimen is incomplete with tail missing but otherwise a quite good one.

 

The black patches in the stomach are remains of food, bones or coprolites but unlikely to be embryos.

 

For the first specimen, the head is buried under the neck and shoulder, as described by @snolly50, I have seen many specimens with twisted neck and head, perhaps because Keichousaurus has a long and flexible neck, like the one below.

IMG_8192~2.jpg

  • I found this Informative 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, snolly50 said:

Is the contorted creature's head not between the red lines I added below, as opposed to the previously cited green marks? I think I am seeing the end of its snoot at the upper red line.

 

khead.jpg.166fe9ab11630c2a5929053ae6b9c085.jpg

 

Quite correct sir!

Dorensigbadges.JPG       

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On ‎14‎.‎02‎.‎2019 at 1:31 AM, Crazyhen said:

Both are genuine specimens of Keichousaurus, acid prepped.  I don't think the first specimen is painted. The second specimen is incomplete with tail missing but otherwise a quite good one.

 

The black patches in the stomach are remains of food, bones or coprolites but unlikely to be embryos.

 

For the first specimen, the head is buried under the neck and shoulder, as described by @snolly50, I have seen many specimens with twisted neck and head, perhaps because Keichousaurus has a long and flexible neck, like the one below.

IMG_8192~2.jpg

 

I agree with that analysis.

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 13/02/2019 at 10:17 PM, snolly50 said:

Is the contorted creature's head not between the red lines I added below, as opposed to the previously cited green marks? I think I am seeing the end of its snoot at the upper red line.

 

khead.jpg.166fe9ab11630c2a5929053ae6b9c085.jpg

 

I agree 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...