Jump to content

Fossil Dinosaurs Getting Too Expensive?


Scylla

Recommended Posts

"'The sale of all fossils is inappropriate,' says Catherine Badgley, former president of the SVP, which represents more than 2,200 international palaeontologists"  Really? Well then let's close all the phosphate mines, coal mines, and limestone and marble quarries ASAP!:P

 

 

https://amp.theguardian.com/science/2019/feb/24/dinosaur-fossils-collectors-museums-price-sale

  • I found this Informative 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Aye, but this from the article to give the statement context:

 

"Badgley’s message to collectors, then, is simple: collect by all means but steer clear of unique specimens."

  • I found this Informative 1

...How to Philosophize with a Hammer

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Scylla said:

"'The sale of all fossils is inappropriate,' says Catherine Badgley, former president of the SVP, which represents more than 2,200 international palaeontologists"  Really? Well then let's close all the phosphate mines, coal mines, and limestone and marble quarries ASAP!:P

 

 

https://amp.theguardian.com/science/2019/feb/24/dinosaur-fossils-collectors-museums-price-sale

Interesting article :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Kane said:

Aye, but this from the article to give the statement context:

 

"Badgley’s message to collectors, then, is simple: collect by all means but steer clear of unique specimens."

Collect but don't buy?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Scylla said:

Collect but don't buy?

Buying is technically a form of collecting. ;) 

...How to Philosophize with a Hammer

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Museums want unique specimens on the cheap.  How do you think that sits with diggers that spend lots of time, money  and risk excavating and preparing these specimens.  They should get market value otherwise why do it. Oh then there will be little found and sold then they wont complain about valuation.

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the problem here is that museums are not well funded enough, which is an issue society should be addressing.

  • I found this Informative 2

“...whilst this planet has gone cycling on according to the fixed law of gravity, from so simple a beginning endless forms most beautiful and most wonderful have been and are being evolved.” ~ Charles Darwin

Happy hunting,

Mason

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, WhodamanHD said:

I think the problem here is that museums are not well funded enough, which is an issue society should be addressing.

Unfortunately, I don't think the museums will ever be funded enough. Remember that the Field Museum was only able to purchase Sue the T. Rex because McDonald's Corporation helped pay for it. 

 

2 hours ago, Scylla said:

"'The sale of all fossils is inappropriate,' says Catherine Badgley, former president of the SVP, which represents more than 2,200 international palaeontologists"  Really? Well then let's close all the phosphate mines, coal mines, and limestone and marble quarries ASAP!:P

 

 

https://amp.theguardian.com/science/2019/feb/24/dinosaur-fossils-collectors-museums-price-sale

 

The article's so-called "unscrupulous people" drive the excavation of fossils. Their fascination with long-gone species is why anybody digs for fossils. It is only because people are willing to spend big bucks on fossils that anything is being dug out. Fossils are constantly being lost to erosion. If only museums could collect unique fossils, many specimens would never be found.

 

To say that "the sale of all fossils is inappropriate" is incredibly naive. The sad truth is that fossils are just dead rocks. Most governments/museums can't justify funding their excavation and study. Private collectors save fossils from being lost forever. 

 

  • I found this Informative 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Praefectus said:

Unfortunately, I don't think the museums will ever be funded enough. Remember that the Field Museum was only able to purchase Sue the T. Rex because McDonald's Corporation helped pay for it. 

 

 

The article's so-called "unscrupulous people" drive the excavation of fossils. Their fascination with long-gone species is why anybody digs for fossils. It is only because people are willing to spend big bucks on fossils that anything is being dug out. Fossils are constantly being lost to erosion. If only museums could collect unique fossils, many specimens would never be found.

 

To say that "the sale of all fossils is inappropriate" is incredibly naive. The sad truth is that fossils are just dead rocks. Most governments/museums can't justify funding their excavation and study. Private collectors save fossils from being lost forever. 

 

This is pretty spot on to be honest. Most dinosaur specialists rely on funding from other sources for most of their digs. If it wasn't for the thousands of people collecting fossils it makes you wonder what state we would be in, both for a knowledge point of view and business. Supply and demand is the reason these fossils are being hailed out the ground!

  • I found this Informative 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm firmly convinced they have their heads in the sand especially with it comes to considering new technology

 

From D Evans twitter

Screenshot_2019-02-27-04-10-01.thumb.jpg.4e3ad711759af81b2522e6f65e7ac111.jpgDz2BPyXXgAAgh3t.thumb.jpeg.5a35734c31ed1844e01330405bb3a982.jpeg

 

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know what to think about that. Money is what makes the thing run. If you don't have money, you can't fund your research and your excavation. If you can't excavate fossils, and then rely on buying fossils instead, then you need money and as museums are short on money. Fossils being such expensive can be frustrating for museums and researchers. However museums can't expect private collectors to provide for free what would be  too expensive for them to do.

 

I often feel a lot of disdain from the scientific community towards amateur/private collectors. It makes me sad as an amateur paleontologist working for a museum (it is just my personal point of view).

 

 

 

 

 

  • I found this Informative 4

 

~~~~~~~~~~~~〇~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 

Warmest greetings from Kumamoto、 Japan

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This article made me angry for so many reasons... The comments under the article's posting on various facebook pages are even worse.  Some people really are clueless. There are countless fossils eroding away to oblivion over hundreds of millions of acres of government land in the US simply because only a few "academics" have permits to access to them.  Open up public land to amateurs and the economic growth and public interest will grow over time and add new generations of paleontologists who will add to the scientific community.  How do you get a kid interested in dinosaurs?  Let him dig up his first tooth or purchase one at a gem and mineral show and he's hooked for life.  Fossils are not rare, they are just not always easily accessible.

  • I found this Informative 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, HamptonsDoc said:

This article made me angry for so many reasons... The comments under the article's posting on various facebook pages are even worse.  Some people really are clueless. There are countless fossils eroding away to oblivion over hundreds of millions of acres of government land in the US simply because only a few "academics" have permits to access to them.  Open up public land to amateurs and the economic growth and public interest will grow over time and add new generations of paleontologists who will add to the scientific community.  How do you get a kid interested in dinosaurs?  Let him dig up his first tooth or purchase one at a gem and mineral show and he's hooked for life.  Fossils are not rare, they are just not always easily accessible.

I completely agree. The amount of scientifically important fossils that “disappear forever” into private collections are a drop in the bucket compared to the amount that are truly gone forever due to lack of funding and manpower to save them from weathering away into oblivion on public lands. Most private collectors I know are happy and proud to have their fossils studied by academics. 

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that some professional paleontologists show enormous disrespect for amateurs with their characterization of who we are and our motivations. They also exhibit extreme intellectual lazyness with comments like "all fossil sales should be banned". Fortunately I think those are the minority. I have collected at rock quarries where beautiful fossils are literally crushed to gravel to pave roadbeds. Phosphate mines, kitty litter mines, cement factories etc.  destroy in a week more than all of TFF could find in a decade. Erosion does degrade and destroy fossils at a rate that prevents us from salvaging all of them, but if professional paleontologists were charged with the job of finding them in time, they could never discover 1/10 of 1% in time. They also would never be able to write their grants, papers, or teach classes. Plus where are the grad students that populate their labs going to come from if interest is not generated in youngsters? Sure some kids get hooked on fossils from books or TV or museum displays, but just watch a 9 year old find his own Paleocene shark tooth (like I did last Saturday) and you'll see how effective a teaching and motivating tool collecting is. All the professional paleontologists I have met encourage amateurs and appreciate our interest. Those that do not do a disservice to their own profession and to all of our community as well. :ank:

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would argue that the tastes of the high end market and professional scientists do not always directly oppose each other.  The high end market sees "name brand" dinos such as T. rex or Triceratops fetch high prices.  I would postulate that for many cases, scientifically valuable pieces aren't as cost prohibitive for scientists simply because they are rare and unknown to most of the amateur market. 

 

The human drive to say "mine" to something rare or precious goes back to the start of our history, it's probably encoded in our DNA to behave so.  Why try to fight the private market when we all know tighter regulation may result in even deeper illicit markets?  The perception of rarity is widely variable to context.  If laws were more open on private fossil collecting, that could pave the way to greater education, understanding, and respect for the fossil heritage.  I think education of the public is the key here.  If everyone is on the same page on how valuable fossils are to understanding the past and to a great extent our very own selves, I would imagine more private collectors would be open to lending a specimen to a institution of research.  I think academics could learn much by re-examining the fossil trade as a form of educational outreach.  Fossils and the processes of finding them can be a great motivational spark for the next generation.

 

On the other hand, I can understand why academics decry private excavation.  There is a loss of contextual data when bones are dug out as quickly and efficiently as possible.  Depending on the specimen, there could be numerous trace fossils and environmental clues that can place the specimen in a tighter strata and thereby extract a more confident placement in time, quite important to know evolutionary or cladistic trends.  I've heard of some amazing fossil finds that aren't as useful for science due to unskilled or negligent excavation.  Then there are outfits that vandalize the land, leaving trash or broken bones (probably not in the western world but in developing nations).  I do agree education can be a two way street.  I think the situation could be very improved if commercial excavation teams recorded some of the contextual data as well.  There's no easy answer to all this, but I hold on to my first argument that education is key in this area.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice to see NHM London discussing this subject.   I pose the question are we "reasearchers" better or worst than not having access to a unique specimen because we do not have the perfect condition to manage it.

 

 

 

  • I found this Informative 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Troodon said:

Nice to see NHM London discussing this subject.   I pose the question are we better or worst than not having access to a unique specimen because we do not have the perfect condition to manage it.

Interesting, thanks for sharing.

5d738606eab6e_2018-11-1322_54_57-Greenshot-newlogo.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...