Jump to content

Peat Burns

Recommended Posts

So, I can't get myself to spend the kind of money necessary for a complete, large, megalodon tooth.  I'd rather spend that kind of money on other fossils in the rare instance that I actually purchase fossils.  I have found some beautiful, complete megs personally, but none bigger than a couple inches.

 

There is a store that I discovered down in Indiana that I call the "Wiccan Store" that has all kinds of beads, incense, crystals, and odd ball assemblages of things.  I went into it years ago just to see what was in there and discovered that, way in the back, they have a little room devoted to rocks, fossils, and minerals.  They used to have a big bin of broken megs averaging about $8 each for the big ones (now all they have are tiny ones in comparison).  At any rate, I bought a huge broken tooth - 6-inches (15 cm) - for $8.  I want to put a monster tooth on display.  But I want the full effect of size that a complete one offers.  So here was my solution (as usual, I forgot to take a true "before" photo, but the photos I did take, early, are sufficient).

 

Here is how it started - the broken tooth with the beginning of the build-up of palaeosculp.  I add no more than about an inch at a time and then let it set-up before adding more.  It gets too difficult to form when in large globs.

1-small.jpg.c4be58722e7a13996b1585c6ff27aa85.jpg

 

The basic form is complete and I'm beginning to add texture here.  

 

2-small.thumb.jpg.507c7f606f5520f14acc215ef8338f7c.jpg

 

Here is the mostly complete restoration.  It was not my intent to restore it like it just fell out of the mouth of the shark, but rather restore it to how it likely looked in the geologic context prior to breaking in half.  Painting is by far the most difficult step.  Matching any one color on the tooth takes as many as 5 or so separate colors and careful mixing to match.  It's not perfect, and I may still work a bit on the texture of the root in spots, but I'm reasonably happy with it.  I showed it around and no one noticed it was restored until I told them, so that's good enough for me for display purposes. :)

 

Apologies to the sharktooth experts if there are any morphological gaffs.

 

3-small.thumb.jpg.524c42333359dfb3de777ded876382ff.jpg

 

@Nimravis @Darktooth @Tidgy's Dad @Bobby Rico @Cowboy Paleontologist

 

 

 

  • I found this Informative 13
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks GREAT! About as big as that log you found. Did you engrave the artist's initials on the back so, in the future, no one mistakes this for a complete meg? That is what I did when I repaired a cheap tooth for a small boy that was shark obsessed.

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, minnbuckeye said:

Did you engrave the artist's initials on the back so, in the future, no one mistakes this for a complete meg?

Thanks, Mike.  LOL (I wish it was that good!), but no, it gets a catalogue number written on it, and in the catalogue, I indicate what areas are real and what areas are restored.  It's a very good point that you bring up, though!  Definitely important to document.  On skeletons, such as the Oreodont I did, I include a color-coded bone-map in the record book indicating bones associated with the original animal, bones used from other animals, and bones that were cast or sculpted.  This is in addition to the individual catalogue numbers written on each real bone and the associated descriptions in the catalogue.

20180309_231703.thumb.jpg.24f56edb1b1b713cf10ddbbf3652eaae.jpg20180308_143538.thumb.jpg.381ca9de56f8d7dea4877028609ab748.jpg

  • I found this Informative 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Nimravis said:

Great Job Tony, know one would notice and it works for the purpose that you restored it for.

Thanks, Ralph :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Dinoguy89 said:

Looks good, you did a nice job :)

 

1 hour ago, Ptychodus04 said:

Well done @Peat Burns. That will present much more effectively than 1/2 a tooth!

Thank you :meg::)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@Peat Burns Excellent work, also on Bingo. I'm impressed!! You're right about the color. Sculpting is hard enough, but mixing and matching the color is still a hit or miss thing for me. I have a few casts of my donated finds done by museum preparators and never cease to be amazed at how genuine the color composition looks.

 

Greetings from the Lake of Constance. Roger

http://www.steinkern.de/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@Peat Burns Nice work Tony very nicely sculpted and you can’t fault your colour matching and painting. You got a nice display piece and next up you have to make a stand (realistically and not metaphorically speaking. :D)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's some excellent work right there:fistbump: Nice job!

Every once in a great while it's not just a big rock down there!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am an Artist and i'm impressed with the texture and color matching you were able to achieve on the meg. What type of sculpting clay and paints do you use? Thank for sharing!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Bronzviking said:

I am an Artist and i'm impressed with the texture and color matching you were able to achieve on the meg. What type of sculpting clay and paints do you use? Thank for sharing!

Thank you very much.  The sculpting material is PaleoSculp, which I love.  Water-soluble prior to hardening.  The pitted root texture was made by using a tooth-brush-sized wire brush with fine, brass bristles, and tapping the bristles lightly against the Palaeosculp prior to hardening.  Doing this at different times during the hardening process achieves slightly different results, which can be useful.  Some of the cracks and linear features were cut-in when the material was still soft.  Others were carved after the material hardened.  Smooth surfaces of the blade were achieved by using a sandpaper series of decreasing grit sizes, ending at around 2000 grit.  Color matching was aided by the use of layers, with more opaque base-layers followed by varying degrees of opacity in subsequent layers, including diluted "washes" as final applications.  For heavily textured areas, I applied a base coat, let it dry, and then used a dry-brush technique to provide the contrast in the "hills and dales" (;)), so to speak.  To match the enamel shine on the blade, I used clear, satin, aerosol spray out of a can from the Walmart.  I did not apply the aerosol to the actual fossil!  The paints were the cheap acrylic Walmart craft paints that come in the small bottles at the Walmart (about $1 each).  I have used these on everything from fossils to fine art, and they have held-up to 24-hour display lighting as well as indirect sunshine for years.  See pics below.

 

Here is a painting on which I am currently working using the cheap Walmart craft paints (I'm a CHEAP-skate, what can I say :blush:.   I prefer to call it "frugal" :)). (I am totally guessing here, but I think @minnbuckeye might like the subject matter :) )

Picture1.png.567ca08b7fa684e33b9ba2c48d6364a1.png

 

This is a palaeoenvironmental reconstruction of a pre-settlement peatland (before it was destroyed by drainage) based on geographic, bathymetric, and macrofossil data that I did back in 1993 using the same Walmart paints.  I can't detect any fading or deterioration of any kind.  This was sealed with an aerosol artists fixative.

 

Picture1.png.0384dfa71d58c8c56a99d336c882488b.png

 

Here are the paints and the pallete I used for the meg tooth.

 

20190228_131525.jpg.425488668dc23d172780c10fcedb0ade.jpg

 

 

 

  • I found this Informative 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...