Oxalaia Posted April 4, 2019 Share Posted April 4, 2019 Just want for someone else to confirm that it is indeed a rex tooth. 45mm long. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Andy- Posted April 4, 2019 Share Posted April 4, 2019 Tyrannosaurid for sure. Can't confirm Rex or not if there isn't locality data. 2 Looking forward to meeting my fellow Singaporean collectors! Do PM me if you are a Singaporean, or an overseas fossil-collector coming here for a holiday! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Troodon Posted April 4, 2019 Share Posted April 4, 2019 Along with the provenance information can you provide side photos. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oxalaia Posted April 4, 2019 Author Share Posted April 4, 2019 3 minutes ago, Troodon said: Along with the provenance information can you provide side photos. 7 minutes ago, -Andy- said: Tyrannosaurid for sure. Can't confirm Rex or not if there isn't locality data. I will know the locality soon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Runner64 Posted April 4, 2019 Share Posted April 4, 2019 If it is from the Hell Creek Formation, it looks to be a Nanotyrannus tooth vs. a Rex tooth. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaimin013 Posted April 4, 2019 Share Posted April 4, 2019 I believe that this particular tooth is a nanotyrannus tooth. The cross section (base) isn't the typical D shape that you see for rex teeth so I am leaning in that direction. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dracorex_hogwartsia Posted April 4, 2019 Share Posted April 4, 2019 I would agree. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fossil'n'Roll Posted April 8, 2019 Share Posted April 8, 2019 I also lean toward Nanotyrannus based on the cross section, but this one doesn't really look pinched in on the sides like a lot Nanotyrannus teeth. It could possibly be a rex maxillary, but at this size it would be difficult to tell. I would label it either as Tyrannosaurid indet. or cf. Nanotyrannus. Here is a post by @Troodon you may find useful. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oxalaia Posted April 8, 2019 Author Share Posted April 8, 2019 6 hours ago, Fossil'n'Roll said: I also lean toward Nanotyrannus based on the cross section, but this one doesn't really look pinched in on the sides like a lot Nanotyrannus teeth. It could possibly be a rex maxillary, but at this size it would be difficult to tell. I would label it either as Tyrannosaurid indet. or cf. Nanotyrannus. Here is a post by @Troodon you may find useful. Hello! Troodon already identified it as a T-rex tooth from Garfield County. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fossil'n'Roll Posted April 8, 2019 Share Posted April 8, 2019 Cool. Congrats on having a nice T. rex tooth! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oxalaia Posted April 9, 2019 Author Share Posted April 9, 2019 16 hours ago, Fossil'n'Roll said: Cool. Congrats on having a nice T. rex tooth! Thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now