Jump to content

Morocco Trilobites


Abstraktum

Recommended Posts

Hello everybody :) 

 

I would love to hear your thoughts on those two Trilobites from KemKem/Morocco (I can't provide a more specific area).

Any red flags visible?

 

I can give more pictures with different angles and details. Just tell me what you need. ;) 

 

And again: Thank you for the help ^_^

 

First Trilobite in Matrix. Length 6,3 cm (2.48 in)

20190406_154533.thumb.jpg.8982067bd6f3bf5efe2c9b35b3294027.jpg20190406_154544.thumb.jpg.235d858074834007613326fc6ef7c825.jpg20190406_154557.thumb.jpg.461b9b3361cb186427d421b37db30688.jpg20190406_154606.thumb.jpg.4e0c5a67156579173a61418c8aae96ad.jpg

 

 

 

 

Second Trilobite rolling around without Matrix :) Length 3,5 cm (1.38 in)

20190406_154618.thumb.jpg.10fcb71b2a31aa8b4e5bff1da19c6578.jpg20190406_154638.thumb.jpg.9baee4435cc4d2bf3943606d063533cd.jpg20190406_154648.thumb.jpg.ea8dbc20cfe07288149f65019f651160.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There aren't any trilobites in Kem Kem, wrong time period. 


These both look fully genuine and very nice. I like the rolled one, because it doesn't seem to have been covered in any black polish to hide prep marks. I can't tell with the one on the matrix, but I can see that it looks to have been prepped to a high standard anyway.

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Aurelius said:

There aren't any trilobites in Kem Kem, wrong time period. 

 

Well year, a few hundret million years apart. Just forget about the KemKem part. That's what happens when you always write KemKem/Morocco :D But Morocco is still correct :) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As the others have stated, Morocco is correct, but Kem Kem has not trilobites because they were already extinct for millions of years when those areas were deposited.

 

 

These are real trilobites though.

  • I found this Informative 1

Olof Moleman AKA Lord Trilobite

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks everybody :)

Yes, that what happens when you're normally deal with KemKem material you start to get used to it and can caught off guard when posting about fossils from Morocco :) 

Better double read before posting :) 

 

Is it also possible to give an ID for those to? They where described as Phacops speculator. As far as I understood this is no longer valid and is now described as Austerops speculaor. Or is it not possible to determine it down to the species?

Hard to tell for me... There are just way to many Trilobits species, when you just get started with this topic :) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/6/2019 at 8:35 AM, Abstraktum said:

20190406_154557.thumb.jpg.461b9b3361cb186427d421b37db30688.jpg

 

 

This specimen is most similar with the eye lens formula and the axial rings and pygidial rib diagnosis of: Hypsipariops vagabundus

 

McKellar, R.C., Chatterton, B.D.E. 2009
Early and Middle Devonian Phacopidae (Trilobita) of southern Morocco.
Palaeontographica Canadiana, 28:1-110

  • I found this Informative 6

image.png.a84de26dad44fb03836a743755df237c.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Origin in Morocco: some miles south of Alnif ;)

 

Both are 100% real and quite well prepped .. good choice!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks! :)

 

I bought it directly from a moroccan Seller at a fossil show in Germany.

He got lot of Trilobites with this kind of quality. Not that cheap, but if they are as real as this one, it's a justified price :)

 

Here are two more pictures of better quality and better light:

 

Unbenannt.thumb.jpg.6714789f31196c6bf0da28d733facec4.jpg

 

Unbenannt2.thumb.jpg.8484d25ed3fc5f74b3d7ea08beb46199.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...