Crazyhen Posted April 9, 2019 Share Posted April 9, 2019 This is from Xingyi of Guizhou in which Keichousaurus is found. It looks like a plant fossil and at the back is fossil of crinoids. Any idea if it is a plant fossil and what plant is that? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caldigger Posted April 9, 2019 Share Posted April 9, 2019 Some closer focused pics of the item in question are in order for a proper ID. Here are a couple of plates I have with a similar look. Lepidodendon sp. tree scale Pennsylvanian Period Lepidophylloide sp. Pennsylvanian Period It would seem the two sides of your plate are from different ages. One from swampy deposits ( tree) and the other from sea deposits ( crinoid ). That is if the item in question is something similar in line with one of these. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crazyhen Posted April 9, 2019 Author Share Posted April 9, 2019 Unfortunately it is not with me and so I could not get higher resolution photos. But it does look like yours. What fossil is yours? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RJB Posted April 9, 2019 Share Posted April 9, 2019 Cool lookin plant! RB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fossildude19 Posted April 9, 2019 Share Posted April 9, 2019 Could be Lepidodendron, as they lasted up until the Late Triassic, and the sediments are Triassic in age, if they were found with Keichousaurs. "They thrived during the Carboniferous Period (about 359.2 ± 2.5 Mya (million years ago) and were found until the Late Triassic, about 205 Ma) before going extinct.[1]" 1 Tim - VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER VFOTM --- APRIL - 2015 __________________________________________________ "In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks." John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~ ><))))( *> About Me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rockwood Posted April 9, 2019 Share Posted April 9, 2019 Global warming was in the end Triassic news. It's easy to see a major hurricane blowing something like it out to sea. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ynot Posted April 9, 2019 Share Posted April 9, 2019 Although crinoids did exist in the jurassic, they are not common. I wonder if the tracks on the back could be trace fossils. If they are jurassic crinoids then I would think that to be more significant than the plant. I would also like to see better close up pictures. 1 Darwin said: " Man sprang from monkeys." Will Rogers said: " Some of them didn't spring far enough." My Fossil collection - My Mineral collection My favorite thread on TFF. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Kmiecik Posted April 9, 2019 Share Posted April 9, 2019 Interesting to have both on opposite sides of the same plate. Very cool and collectible. Mark. Fossil hunting is easy -- they don't run away when you shoot at them! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now