Zenmaster6 Posted May 3, 2019 Share Posted May 3, 2019 Hello, Someone says Cyathea, I think it looks like Neuropteris Flexuosa. Input? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Kmiecik Posted May 3, 2019 Share Posted May 3, 2019 I'm leaning towards Neuropteris. Pinnules populate the rachis more densely than Cyathea. I don't know if we can get down to species, but Flexuosa is a possibility. Just noticed this specimen is "56 mya". I don't think Neuropteris made it that far into the future. 1 Mark. Fossil hunting is easy -- they don't run away when you shoot at them! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
piranha Posted May 3, 2019 Share Posted May 3, 2019 Neuropteris is too old and not present in these BC / Washington floras. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doushantuo Posted May 4, 2019 Share Posted May 4, 2019 There was(is?/haven't checked yet) a Pecopteris cyathea,which your specimen (I hesitate to say "obviously")can't be,for the simple reason Piranha outlined. The tree fern genus Cyathea is a not uncommon constituent of Paleocene("early Tertiary") paleofloras,I believe. IF i may ask,why the "PETM"? I take it you are familiar with the true meaning of the acronym? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rockwood Posted May 4, 2019 Share Posted May 4, 2019 Tree ferns are restricted to southern latitudes today, but the leaves of ground ferns which look very similar are common in the Maine woods. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zenmaster6 Posted May 4, 2019 Author Share Posted May 4, 2019 13 hours ago, doushantuo said: There was(is?/haven't checked yet) a Pecopteris cyathea,which your specimen (I hesitate to say "obviously")can't be,for the simple reason Piranha outlined. The tree fern genus Cyathea is a not uncommon constituent of Paleocene("early Tertiary") paleofloras,I believe. IF i may ask,why the "PETM"? I tak/e it you are familiar with the true meaning of the acronym? PETM is just how I think of these when I see them. These strange tropical plants from the thermal maximum. It seems significant to me at least, when identifying them. Sort of like buchia are usually indicative of the Jurassic - Cretaceous Boundary period. I feel maybe adding PETM might help someone identify this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zenmaster6 Posted May 4, 2019 Author Share Posted May 4, 2019 So I'm still uncertain. Is Cyathea off the table? I would imagine that a Cyathea frond fossil would have more leaflets connected to the fossil, this seems more like a ground fern of some kind but I still am at a lose. I'm making this assumption as well, based on this chart and this link https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Chuckanut-Formation-leaf-fossils-A-Sassafras-B-Taxodium-swamp-cypress-C_fig2_266138817 Stating that this fern which looks identical is a Cyathea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now