Mawsonia skull parts

[Yasmin95]

 Hey y'all, 

I have some part, probably, Mawsonia. I think the third thing in the top is an angular. The last thing, i think, is the top part of a skull but not from mawsonia but another fish like. 

 

Can someone tell me if I am looking in the right direction?

 

Oh, the distance between the 4 linea is 1 cm each.

Thank you 

  

[Fossildude19]

Rotated, Cropped, and brightened: 

 

 

 

[Yasmin95]

Thanks, could not do that on my phone. But now the description is different. The first one is angular. 

The last one on the top row is from a different fish.

[Pemphix]

I think the direction to Mawsonidae is the right one:

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/256422700_New_materials_of_a_Cretaceous_coelacanth_Mawsonia_lavocati_Tabaste_from_Morocco

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/255571229_New_occurrence_of_Mawsonia_Sarcopterygii_Actinistia_from_the_Early_Cretaceous_of_the_Sanfranciscana_Basin_Minas_Gerais_southeastern_Brazil

Nevertheless since no further info about country, location, strata etc. has been provided, it will be problematic to go further...

[LordTrilobite]

Well it definitely looks like fish at least. Do you perhaps know if any of these are associated?

 

Some reference for Mawsoniids. Though These seem to be different bones.

[Yasmin95]

It is from the KemKem beds of Morocco. So it is probably around 100 million years old. 

 

I dont know of they are associated. They came in a box with a lot of different bones. I thought it looked like the angular from the paper about Mawsonia, early cretaceous of south Brazil.