Jump to content

Point A dam Fossils


ScienceGuy

Recommended Posts

Can someone please help identify? I used some keys from the Eocene Era to help. Maybe some correct? Thanks 

96792D13-D2A7-4295-949E-6BEEF636CF36.jpeg

A5D4A568-A79A-4B6E-91A2-6413D512A684.jpeg

8F5CD8DE-70B3-46FB-BEEF-5FEEC4C0D6D9.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe #4 is Barracuda.

Cookie Cutter teeth are real small.

Dorensigbadges.JPG       

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ScienceGuy said:

Can someone please help identify? I used some keys from the Eocene Era to help. Maybe some correct? Thanks 

96792D13-D2A7-4295-949E-6BEEF636CF36.jpeg

I believe you're correct. #3 is an interesting tooth in that it resembles a G. mayumbensis. The narrow width and v-shaped root base...perhaps G. eaglesomi or a G. latidens sympheseal?   Id' like to hear others.

 

 

'Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.'

George Santayana

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, ScienceGuy said:

Can someone please help identify? I used some keys from the Eocene Era to help. Maybe some correct? Thanks 

 

A5D4A568-A79A-4B6E-91A2-6413D512A684.jpeg

 

#7  Is it circular in cross-section and does it posses longitudinal ridges?  I can't tell with the photo. If both yes, it is a Cylindrocanthus bill section. Cylindrocanthus was an early billfish (pls see photo below).

#8 Isurus praecursor. #9 I agree, Anomotodon.  I'm going to pass on #10. There is a still-active thread where these Eocene striated 'sand tiger' teeth are bantered about. There are several species that look very similar. In my collection, I lump them all together as "Striatolamia sp." in quotes.  May those who are more brave than I try to speciate these, LOL 

Cylindracanthus_eocene[1].jpg

'Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.'

George Santayana

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, ScienceGuy said:

Can someone please help identify? I used some keys from the Eocene Era to help. Maybe some correct? Thanks 

8F5CD8DE-70B3-46FB-BEEF-5FEEC4C0D6D9.jpeg

#4 Concur with your second option and Caldigger: fish tooth. In the Mio-Pliocene folks call them "barracuda", but wahoo teeth are similar.  I think "mackerel family" is a good option.

'Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.'

George Santayana

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would call #3 Galeocerdo latidens, it is just a different tooth position than #1. I think #9 and #10 are Striatolamia macrota. Number 8 Macrorhizodus.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, ScienceGuy said:

 

 

11 hours ago, ScienceGuy said:

 

 

11 hours ago, ScienceGuy said:

 

Thanks Caldigger

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, hemipristis said:

#7  Is it circular in cross-section and does it posses longitudinal ridges?  I can't tell with the photo. If both yes, it is a Cylindrocanthus bill section. Cylindrocanthus was an early billfish (pls see photo below).

#8 Isurus praecursor. #9 I agree, Anomotodon.  I'm going to pass on #10. There is a still-active thread where these Eocene striated 'sand tiger' teeth are bantered about. There are several species that look very similar. In my collection, I lump them all together as "Striatolamia sp." in quotes.  May those who are more brave than I try to speciate these, LOL 

Cylindracanthus_eocene[1].jpg

Yes has ridges but less pronounced. Is more flattened than round. Thanks for all the great information!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just for a size reference, this

Cookie Cutter shark tooth is in a 1" gem box.

20190604_044726.jpg

Dorensigbadges.JPG       

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, caldigger said:

Just for a size reference, this

Cookie Cutter shark tooth is in a 1" gem box.

20190604_044726.jpg

Wow! That is small. Thanks for your help. I’m just getting started with all keying and such. It’s not always clear cut. Rely on the experienced folks like you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Al Dente said:

 Number 8 Macrorhizodus.

Same thing.

'Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.'

George Santayana

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On ‎6‎/‎3‎/‎2019 at 7:51 PM, hemipristis said:

#7  Is it circular in cross-section and does it posses longitudinal ridges?  I can't tell with the photo. If both yes, it is a Cylindrocanthus bill section. Cylindrocanthus was an early billfish (pls see photo below).

#8 Isurus praecursor. #9 I agree, Anomotodon.  I'm going to pass on #10. There is a still-active thread where these Eocene striated 'sand tiger' teeth are bantered about. There are several species that look very similar. In my collection, I lump them all together as "Striatolamia sp." in quotes.  May those who are more brave than I try to speciate these, LOL 

Cylindracanthus_eocene[1].jpg

 

Concerning #7: It has the ridges along the wide sides and one of the narrow sides (it is more flat than round). It also is broken in one of its narrow sides exposing a different textured and colored material on the inside.  Rostral Sawfish Tooth? Pristis lathami? See pic:

8FD194F5-534A-4D81-AA53-0AC6A4ECA299.jpeg

Edited by ScienceGuy
added data
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ScienceGuy said:

 

Concerning #7: It has the ridges along the wide sides and one of the narrow sides (it is more flat than round). It also is broken in one of its narrow sides exposing a different textured and colored material on the inside.  Rostral Sawfish Tooth? Pristis lathami? See pic:

8FD194F5-534A-4D81-AA53-0AC6A4ECA299.jpeg

Im going to stick with my initial recommendation: Cylindrocanthus sp. bill fragment. 

 

An interesting article on these: https://sdaos.org/wp-content/uploads/pdfs/2001/161-172.pdf

  • I found this Informative 1

'Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.'

George Santayana

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, hemipristis said:

Im going to stick with my initial recommendation: Cylindrocanthus sp. bill fragment. 

 

An interesting article on these: https://sdaos.org/wp-content/uploads/pdfs/2001/161-172.pdf

thanks for the second look. The article is interesting...thanks for that...helps me build my background knowledge. I'm going to stick with your initial recommendation as well.  I submitted another post about an hour ago with a pic and info on another find...I think it is shark coprolite based on the research I've been doing.  I'm curious about what you think.  Take a look if you don't mind.  Thanks again!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...