b. bartron Posted June 9, 2019 Share Posted June 9, 2019 I found a rare tooth from my local miocene exposure in calvert county md. Found along the choptank formation. Believed to be carnivorous dog. But not positive. Any help with a confirmed id would be appreciated Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caldigger Posted June 9, 2019 Share Posted June 9, 2019 @Carl Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harry Pristis Posted June 9, 2019 Share Posted June 9, 2019 The tooth appears to be a canid M2, but I am not aware of a land mammal element in the Miocene Choptank Fm. 1 http://pristis.wix.com/the-demijohn-page What seest thou else In the dark backward and abysm of time? ---Shakespeare, The Tempest Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rockwood Posted June 9, 2019 Share Posted June 9, 2019 27 minutes ago, Harry Pristis said: The tooth appears to be a canid M2, but I am not aware of a land mammal element in the Miocene Choptank Fm. I think they are known to be found, but less common. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
b. bartron Posted June 10, 2019 Author Share Posted June 10, 2019 11 hours ago, Harry Pristis said: The tooth appears to be a canid M2, but I am not aware of a land mammal element in the Miocene Choptank Fm. Any idea of how i can find out the species? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scylla Posted June 10, 2019 Share Posted June 10, 2019 8 minutes ago, b. bartron said: Any idea of how i can find out the species? Calvert Marine Museum might be able to help. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
b. bartron Posted June 10, 2019 Author Share Posted June 10, 2019 Unfortunately its rare enough that Mr. Godfrey wasn't familiar with the species either. Canid m2 left side is as far as it goes so far. It spent a lengthy time at the Smithsonian in d.c also..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scylla Posted June 10, 2019 Share Posted June 10, 2019 14 minutes ago, b. bartron said: Unfortunately its rare enough that Mr. Godfrey wasn't familiar with the species either. Canid m2 left side is as far as it goes so far. It spent a lengthy time at the Smithsonian in d.c also..... So new species? Or just too difficult to ID with certainty? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarcoSr Posted June 11, 2019 Share Posted June 11, 2019 You might also contact Ralph Eshelman if you haven't already. PM sent with contact information. Marco Sr. 1 "Any day that you can fossil hunt is a great day." My family fossil website Some Of My Shark, Ray, Fish And Other Micros My Extant Shark Jaw Collection Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fossildude19 Posted June 11, 2019 Share Posted June 11, 2019 A guest sent this in: @b. bartron "I think the tooth is probably a mustelid. I would like to examine it if possible. Suggest you contact John Nance at Calvert Marine Museum" 1 Tim - VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER VFOTM --- APRIL - 2015 __________________________________________________ "In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks." John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~ ><))))( *> About Me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harry Pristis Posted June 11, 2019 Share Posted June 11, 2019 Mustelid? Maybe so. The tooth would have to be an M1, rather than an M2. Here's a line-drawing with a comparison of canid M2 to mustelid M1: http://what-when-how.com/marine-mammals/mustelidae-marine-mammals/ 3 http://pristis.wix.com/the-demijohn-page What seest thou else In the dark backward and abysm of time? ---Shakespeare, The Tempest Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carl Posted June 12, 2019 Share Posted June 12, 2019 On 6/9/2019 at 11:12 AM, caldigger said: @Carl Way out of my area of expertise, I'm afraid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caldigger Posted June 12, 2019 Share Posted June 12, 2019 1 hour ago, Carl said: Way out of my area of expertise, I'm afraid. Strange, I don't recall tagging you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
b. bartron Posted June 17, 2019 Author Share Posted June 17, 2019 On 6/11/2019 at 9:17 AM, Fossildude19 said: A guest sent this in: @b. bartron "I think the tooth is probably a mustelid. I would like to examine it if possible. Suggest you contact John Nance at Calvert Marine Museum" Mr Nance and Mr. Godfrey have examined it. But it's nothing common from our exposure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
b. bartron Posted June 17, 2019 Author Share Posted June 17, 2019 On 6/11/2019 at 9:17 AM, Fossildude19 said: A guest sent this in: @b. bartron "I think the tooth is probably a mustelid. I would like to examine it if possible. Suggest you contact John Nance at Calvert Marine Museum" On 6/10/2019 at 8:17 AM, Scylla said: So new species? Or just too difficult to ID with certainty? Its possible that its new. Or its likely that its just very uncommon to find in our locality and may just be an update to the range. Im an amateur so im pretty much clueless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
b. bartron Posted June 17, 2019 Author Share Posted June 17, 2019 On 6/11/2019 at 1:55 PM, Harry Pristis said: Mustelid? Maybe so. The tooth would have to be an M1, rather than an M2. Here's a line-drawing with a comparison of canid M2 to mustelid M1: http://what-when-how.com/marine-mammals/mustelidae-marine-mammals/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
digit Posted June 17, 2019 Share Posted June 17, 2019 1 hour ago, b. bartron said: Im an amateur so im pretty much clueless. And here is your opportunity to work with some of the professionals and not only absorb some knowledge from them but represent all us avocational fossil hunters by strengthening the cooperation with those that have made a career in paleontology. I've always enjoyed my encounters with the geologists, coral reef scientists, marine taxonomists, and paleontologists I've had the privilege to work with on projects. It's very exciting to find a rarity that stumps the experts. Keep us informed and let us know how this plays out. Cheers. -Ken 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harry Pristis Posted June 17, 2019 Share Posted June 17, 2019 3 hours ago, b. bartron said: The tooth better resembles the canid example, doesn't it. 1 http://pristis.wix.com/the-demijohn-page What seest thou else In the dark backward and abysm of time? ---Shakespeare, The Tempest Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miocene_Mason Posted June 17, 2019 Share Posted June 17, 2019 There is Cynarctus wangi present as well as C. marylandica. 1 “...whilst this planet has gone cycling on according to the fixed law of gravity, from so simple a beginning endless forms most beautiful and most wonderful have been and are being evolved.” ~ Charles Darwin Happy hunting, Mason Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
b. bartron Posted June 17, 2019 Author Share Posted June 17, 2019 6 hours ago, Harry Pristis said: The tooth better resembles the canid example, doesn't it. the only thing ive found similar is bear dog. The difference is they are larger and the root structure is straighter where as mine is half the size and one root has a hook shape to it. The nature of the bite seems the same . Having a grinding edge and a cutting edge. im considering different options on what to do with the tooth at the moment. A positive id would be great. But do i really just want to donate it for the purposes of study? Ive donated a fair amount of stuff. And I'll admit i kinda regreat the rare thing i have already let go of. So. Im stuck with wanting to and not wanting to equally. Its not the collectors fault than science demands ownership for scientific purpose. And if it turns out that the 3d imaging will solve the issue and backup collection finds for study than id be totally down to lend it for that process. I hope the project works out and we have a way around the issue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
b. bartron Posted June 17, 2019 Author Share Posted June 17, 2019 5 hours ago, WhodamanHD said: There is Cynarctus wangi present as well as C. marylandica. can you locate occlusal veiw of C wangi! Youve peaked my interest Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harry Pristis Posted June 18, 2019 Share Posted June 18, 2019 I don't think this tooth is from an amphicyonid. 3 http://pristis.wix.com/the-demijohn-page What seest thou else In the dark backward and abysm of time? ---Shakespeare, The Tempest Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miocene_Mason Posted June 18, 2019 Share Posted June 18, 2019 2 hours ago, b. bartron said: can you locate occlusal veiw of C wangi! Indeed I can, see below. (From here) 52 minutes ago, Harry Pristis said: don't think this tooth is from an amphicyonid. I was suggesting it as it is the first thing that pops into my head when someone says “canid” at Calvert. 1 “...whilst this planet has gone cycling on according to the fixed law of gravity, from so simple a beginning endless forms most beautiful and most wonderful have been and are being evolved.” ~ Charles Darwin Happy hunting, Mason Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
siteseer Posted June 18, 2019 Share Posted June 18, 2019 5 hours ago, b. bartron said: the only thing ive found similar is bear dog. The difference is they are larger and the root structure is straighter where as mine is half the size and one root has a hook shape to it. The nature of the bite seems the same . Having a grinding edge and a cutting edge. im considering different options on what to do with the tooth at the moment. A positive id would be great. But do i really just want to donate it for the purposes of study? Ive donated a fair amount of stuff. And I'll admit i kinda regreat the rare thing i have already let go of. So. Im stuck with wanting to and not wanting to equally. Its not the collectors fault than science demands ownership for scientific purpose. And if it turns out that the 3d imaging will solve the issue and backup collection finds for study than id be totally down to lend it for that process. I hope the project works out and we have a way around the issue. I understand your dilemma. You're not against donating something weird because you've done it before. You'd like to keep it but you don't know what it is so maybe you should donate it for that reason. It's not really a good display piece but you haven't found anything like it before and are unlikely to again. I get it. It's not the scientists' fault that science demands ownership either. There are numerous instances from the old days when scientists officially described type specimens and then let the amateur keep it, but when a scientist tried to find the owner later so he could examine it as part of another study, the owner had died or moved or the specimen was sold or lost in a move. And 3D imaging won't solve everything either. You can't do an isotope analysis on the "enamel" of a replica. You can't do a chemical analysis (or any other test) of any of the adhering matrix either. You just have the size and shape of it. To me if you don't know what it is and are unlikely to study the range of mustelids and/or dogs known from the time frame (approx. 11-14 million years ago), you should donate it and leave it to the mammal people. It's probably something new or at least significantly extends the range of something known in time and or paleogeography. Land mammals are poorly known from the Miocene of the east coast north of Florida and mustelids (if that's what it is) are poorly known from the Miocene of that coast period. If you're going to keep it, make a good label for it (clearly print exactly where you found it and why you say it's from the Choptank) and put it in your will where that tooth should go. Something like that doesn't have much of a monetary value, though it is weird if it is a dog or mustelid, so it has real scientific value. If you don't have a will and don't get around to writing one, the tooth will almost certainly be lost forever. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
siteseer Posted June 18, 2019 Share Posted June 18, 2019 20 hours ago, b. bartron said: @fossillarry Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now