Reklaw Posted June 24, 2019 Share Posted June 24, 2019 So this is a fossil from Beloit Wisconsin found in the Platteville formation. I am pretty sure it is a cephalopod but I have no idea what genus or species. The siphuncle is hollow except for two septa that run right through it. 3" post-it note for scale. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FossilNerd Posted June 25, 2019 Share Posted June 25, 2019 I agree that it is a cephalopod, but I think it will be hard to say what genus or species this is. There are a few different straight cephalopods found in the Platteville Formation (Ordovician). It might be a section of Actinoceras, as I believe it is fairly common in that formation, but not sure. The good thing about science is that it's true whether or not you believe in it. -Neil deGrasse Tyson Everyone you will ever meet knows something you don't. -Bill Nye (The Science Guy) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manticocerasman Posted June 25, 2019 Share Posted June 25, 2019 I would keep it at "Cephalopod orthocone" It will be hard to make out more of it. growing old is mandatory but growing up is optional. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FossilDAWG Posted June 25, 2019 Share Posted June 25, 2019 The straight siphuncle without deposits,and the lack of deposits in the camerae, is suggestive of a michelinocerid. Actinocerids have large siphucles, which expand into the camerae (so they look like a string of flattened disks strung together), filled with deposits. In addition the camerae are filled with deposits on the ventral side. Basically, michelinocerids were active swimmers with lightly built shells and actinocerids lived on the sea floor and had heavy deposits in their shell to weight them down. Don 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reklaw Posted July 1, 2019 Author Share Posted July 1, 2019 Thank you! Looks about right to me! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reklaw Posted July 12, 2019 Author Share Posted July 12, 2019 An update to this post, I found a very similar looking fossil in "The Geology of Minnesota" (1872) and it is labeled as a Tripteroceras planodorsatum. And I found another one that was out of the matrix with the characteristic flattened triangle shape of the Tripterocerids, so I am pretty sure it is in fact a T. planodorsatum not a michelinocerid. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now