Jump to content

ScandinavianBleu

Recommended Posts

In my hunt to find things on my shoreline Ottertail county Minnesota on North Turtle Lake I have collected what I have been told by the University of Minnesota are bison bones. I broke my wrist collecting this spring so I have been reduced to looking over my finds and I noticed for the first time what looks like cut marks. I have also found various tools including a core rock. Does anyone know if these are marks made by a tool?

BB8FDE76-275E-4E70-9BE0-5E56A1F4DB7C.jpeg

E4CD4349-D0C7-4561-BB46-EBD881D68B04.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's possible, but those marks are suspiciously parallel. Would be difficult for a human using a tool to make such incredibly precise incisions. It's difficult to get them lined up so well when you try to, let alone when butchering some food. I'm trying to imagine what else may have caused these marks but I'm not coming up with much at this time.

  • I found this Informative 1

 

 

Mark.

 

Fossil hunting is easy -- they don't run away when you shoot at them!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Al Dente said:

The marks might have been made by a rodent chewing on the bone.

Much too evenly spaced and parallel. Bite marks are almost never that precise.

 

 

Mark.

 

Fossil hunting is easy -- they don't run away when you shoot at them!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Rockwood said:

Blow from a hand axe ?

16 blows from a hand axe spaced exactly 1/16 of an inch apart?

If I didn't know better I'd say it's a bar code. :D

 

 

Mark.

 

Fossil hunting is easy -- they don't run away when you shoot at them!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Mark Kmiecik said:

16 blows from a hand axe spaced exactly 1/16 of an inch apart?

If I didn't know better I'd say it's a bar code. :D

16 tiny crescent shapes left from retouching the cutting surface on one axe. 

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The crucial image is slightly out of focus, so it is impossible to assess the nature of the marks.  Here's an example of butcher marks from a stone tool:

 

 

tapir_radius_cuts.JPG

  • I found this Informative 2

http://pristis.wix.com/the-demijohn-page

 

What seest thou else

In the dark backward and abysm of time?

---Shakespeare, The Tempest

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really appreciate all of the replies. I was hoping I finally found something really cool...I will have to wait to get my cast off and go back to searching . I did find a rock ,flint I think ,very hard and shiny with chonchoidal fractures so I was hoping...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Harry Pristis said:

The crucial image is slightly out of focus, so it is impossible to assess the nature of the marks.  Here's an example of butcher marks from a stone tool:

 

 

tapir_radius_cuts.JPG

 

618549EA-B615-4696-B78B-605DF563A945.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Rockwood said:

Bone working was limited to butchery ?

No, but the animal was butchered no matter what the end result.

  • I found this Informative 1

 

 

Mark.

 

Fossil hunting is easy -- they don't run away when you shoot at them!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That bone looks like it is quite tumbled and worn and the scar appears to post date the wear suggesting it is a later feature not connected to butchery.

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, westcoast said:

the scar appears to post date the wear

Wouldn't the surface texture of the individual striations be smoother than that of the bone were this the case ? Color is about all I see that is different.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...