Jump to content

Amateur hunter needs help!


Littlebit

Recommended Posts

Very much an amateur here. Recently some farmland in east Tulsa was scraped off for a new housing addition. I have found lots of crinoid stems and a few shells and trilobites. But I don’t know what this is that I found today. Can anyone help?

1816DBDA-EB06-439A-B5C7-7E43B28C9EB9.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Possibly a nautiloid. Could we get more shots, including on the sides and directly of the cross section?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just say that @connorp already asked what I was going to ask,  Nevermind :D

'Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.'

George Santayana

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it looks more like a trace fossil. It's a little to chaotically structured for a body. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is this in a karst formation? If there is a lot of limestone in the area then this might be a dripstone formation, i.e. stalagmite or stalagmite. That would be consistent with the circular pattern on cross section.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A few more pictures would be very helpful. :) 

The good thing about science is that it's true whether or not you believe in it.  -Neil deGrasse Tyson

 

Everyone you will ever meet knows something you don't. -Bill Nye (The Science Guy)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

3 hours ago, Scylla said:

Is this in a karst formation? If there is a lot of limestone in the area then this might be a dripstone formation, i.e. stalagmite or stalagmite. That would be consistent with the circular pattern on cross section.

 

There appears to be a small gastropod at about 4 o'clock on the "cut" surface, so unlikely to be stalactite. I thought cephalopod at first thinking the circular spot was a siphuncle. But the gastropod makes me lean towards @Rockwood's ID. The pictures asked for should help to ascertain an answer.

 

 Mike

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, minnbuckeye said:

 

 

There appears to be a small gastropod at about 4 o'clock on the "cut" surface, so unlikely to be stalactite. I thought cephalopod at first thinking the circular spot was a siphuncle. But the gastropod makes me lean towards @Rockwood's ID. The pictures asked for should help to ascertain an answer.

 

 Mike

I only have my cell phone, so I can't see a gastropod, although I have seen thousands of fossil gastropods in a dripstone cave in Ha Long Bay in Vietnam. It was inhabited by paleo humans who ate the (then) freshwater snails and now the whole area is ocean. 

 

Anyway I still agree that a gastropod fossil embedded in this rock makes dripstone very unlikely. Did you see the crinoid columnal in the chert?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Scylla said:

Did you see the crinoid columnal in the chert?

If other evidence supports this ID the poor preservation could be a clue what to expect overall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...