Jump to content

Cretaceous Mancos Shale Moab Invert


ober

Recommended Posts

Hello all

 

I wonder if anyone can help me with this invert. It is from the area between Moab and I-70, in a formation identified as Mancos Shale by a former BLM paleontologist. Roadside Geology of Utah places this area as Cretaceous. The shell is 3cm long and and about 2.75cm side. The distinguishing feature is a grove running down the center on the longer dimension. There is sign of horizontal banding. I have looked in the Atlas of Cretaceous Life online, Index Fossils of No. Amer., Invertebrate Fossils by Moore et al and “Mid-Cretaceous molliscan record from west-central New Mexico. The closest pictures I find are in Invert Fossils, p 252, figure 6-34 as suborder Productacea juresania,  but this item is Pennsylvanian-Permian. There are several other earlier brachiopods that look similar, but nothing  cretaceous with this indent down the middle. The indent does not look like damage, but actually structural. I think, for some reason this is a mollusk, but may be wrong. I don’t know to what extent the surface of the shell was damaged in removing the overlayer. I will post another picture.

 

Thanks for your help.

 

Tom

D67EF715-6678-4785-A0FB-A62A37CF4D8A.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kind of looks like a trilobite. But I'm frequently wrong! :zzzzscratchchin:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

:popcorn: John

I had a friend once, but the wheels fell off. Sad, very sad. - Nightwing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks to me to be part of a pelecypod shell from the genus Pyncnodonte or Gryphaea . 

-Dave

__________________________________________________

Geologists on the whole are inconsistent drivers. When a roadcut presents itself, they tend to lurch and weave. To them, the roadcut is a portal, a fragment of a regional story, a proscenium arch that leads their imaginations into the earth and through the surrounding terrain. - John McPhee

If I'm going to drive safely, I can't do geology. - John McPhee

Check out my Blog for more fossils I've found: http://viewsofthemahantango.blogspot.com/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Shamalama said:

Looks to me to be part of a pelecypod shell from the genus Pyncnodonte or Gryphaea . 

Dave, thanks for this lead. I will explore this avenue. Tom

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, JohnBrian said:

Kind of looks like a trilobite. But I'm frequently wrong! :zzzzscratchchin:

John, not a trilobite, they were extinct for more than 150 million years by the time this creature enjoyed its time in the sea. Tom

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, JohnBrian said:

Kind of looks like a trilobite. But I'm frequently wrong! :zzzzscratchchin:

 

1 hour ago, ober said:

John, not a trilobite, they were extinct for more than 150 million years by the time this creature enjoyed its time in the sea. Tom

 

:DOH: Totally missed the part where he said it was cretaceous! Like I said above, I'm frequently wrong!

 

But to me it looks like a piece of a trilobite covered by a thin bit of matrix.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

:popcorn: John

I had a friend once, but the wheels fell off. Sad, very sad. - Nightwing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Shamalama said:

Looks to me to be part of a pelecypod shell from the genus Pyncnodonte or Gryphaea . 

Hello Dave, I can see the possibility/likelihood this falls under Gryphaea. G wratheri, Index Fossils p397 describes this fossil as clear as I’ve found, although the geographic location is further east. I don’t have an idea of its range. Thanks for your help. I am finding a world of interesting web sources and will continue to look for a good match within Gryphaea. Do you have a reference you particularly like to use in answering this type of question? Thanks. Tom

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, ober said:

Hello Dave, I can see the possibility/likelihood this falls under Gryphaea. G wratheri, Index Fossils p397 describes this fossil as clear as I’ve found, although the geographic location is further east. I don’t have an idea of its range. Thanks for your help. I am finding a world of interesting web sources and will continue to look for a good match within Gryphaea. Do you have a reference you particularly like to use in answering this type of question? Thanks. Tom

Tom, I don't have much experience with the Mancos Shale but the shape and age made me think of those more common genera.  I think you are doing the right thing by using the resources you have found and asking here. It's pretty much what I would do! :)

-Dave

__________________________________________________

Geologists on the whole are inconsistent drivers. When a roadcut presents itself, they tend to lurch and weave. To them, the roadcut is a portal, a fragment of a regional story, a proscenium arch that leads their imaginations into the earth and through the surrounding terrain. - John McPhee

If I'm going to drive safely, I can't do geology. - John McPhee

Check out my Blog for more fossils I've found: http://viewsofthemahantango.blogspot.com/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...