Jump to content


Recommended Posts


Another piece from the collection at work:


All I've been told is that it was donated to us by a customer at a show in Helena, Montana. Its described as a Hadrosaur pubis. It's clearly seen some restoration work at some point, with many fractures mended together. Its in two pieces currently, which is how it was when I came on the show. One side is gently cambered, the other side is almost unnaturally flat, which is why a pubis bone makes sense to me.


It was at one point called a Tyrannosaur scapula, but I'm not clear if that was actually what the donor called it before we decided it was a pubis, or if a former employee was calling it that to make it seem sexier.


Photos: https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=19M6iJbx2IHUm-KxI9TwcFtnlCDGzpHcV


Link to post
Share on other sites

Photos posted directly here for posterity and those who do not wish to leave the Forum to view them. 


Exterior links go defunct, and then no value can be had from the picture-less post.  :( 


20190921_114629.jpg    20190921_114634.jpg20190921_114727.jpg20190921_114733.jpg20190921_114742.jpg20190921_114830.jpg20190921_114915.jpg20190921_114920.jpg20190921_114931.jpg20190921_114951.jpg

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

It's very fragmentary.


But yes, hadrosaur pubis certainly fits. And I don't think Tyrannosaur scapula fits at all. It seems too thin in the middle and fans out too much at both ends. Tyrannosaur scapulae are more slender than this.


I think hadrosaur pubis is a fine ID for this bone.


Here's an partial example of a hadrosaur pubis from my collection for reference.


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Create New...