Jump to content

Mystery trails on Calcite crystal


DennisAUS

Recommended Posts

I have a sample of calcite crystal from Corop in Victoria, Australia. It has a collection of "growths" which I struggle to understand. Given these rocks are Cambrian and were formed in very hot conditions (volcanic, underwater ) no fossils could be expected. It's more likely to be a mineral dissolution feature, but not possible to tell. My problem is the way the "worm holes" butt against each other without joining, suggesting some kind of organic replacement. My mystery appears to follow fractures and isn't evenly tubular. It comes from a road metal quarry in the vicinity of a fault region filled with minerals, where the calcite is among material blasted from a vertical wall so the depth and surrounding rock is not clear. Perhaps it has joined the site over the eons since the rock formed. My local museum geology department has no answer yet. Photographs taken with microscope X10. Any ideas?

wormhole in calcite Xal.2.jpg

wormhole in calcite Xal.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It looks like the tubular/tabular brownish layered areas formed first in an open cavity probably by mineralized water. Layers of brownish minerals possible coated elongated crystals. Later on, the spaces between the brownish minerals was filled with larger white crystals of calcite. I doubt that the larger white calcite crystals were burrowed by “worms” or dissolved and later the tubular holes were lined with the brownish minerals.

  • I found this Informative 1

My goal is to leave no stone or fossil unturned.   

See my Arizona Paleontology Guide    link  The best single resource for Arizona paleontology anywhere.       

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Given the way the brown and white follow fractures around corners and over edges I think the white calcite main crystal mass came first. The brown may then have been laid down in layers with white, but why do the formations not join? Even if there were originally other crystals in the spaces, I would have expected a continuous single edge where the brown formed. On further trips I have looked for more samples of the same material, without success, so I only have one small sample. Thanks anyway for your comments. I will ponder further.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would concur basically with DPS's evaluation. It could however also be the case that the brown and white bits are broken off from a previous formation from the volcanic spring and were then floating in the mineral gel before it hardened. Perhaps a view of the complete rock would help.

 

Greetings from the Lake of Constance. Roger

http://www.steinkern.de/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here are a few un-magnified shots of the whole sample. Total length is about 2.5 inches. Sample was amongst quarry blasting debris when found, so original situe is not known

w-calcite2.jpg

w-Calcite 1.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, DennisAUS said:

Here are a few un-magnified shots of the whole sample. Total length is about 2.5 inches. Sample was amongst quarry blasting debris when found, so original situe is not known

w-calcite2.jpg

w-Calcite 1.jpg

Seeing the whole rock makes me more certain that a single crystal of calcite grew around a layered mineral. The tan mineral is basically an inclusion in the calcite.

My goal is to leave no stone or fossil unturned.   

See my Arizona Paleontology Guide    link  The best single resource for Arizona paleontology anywhere.       

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, DPS Ammonite said:

Seeing the whole rock makes me more certain that a single crystal of calcite grew around a layered mineral. The tan mineral is basically an inclusion in the calcite.

 Absolutely agree. You have massive Calcite there, no real crystal faces, just cleavage. the Brown areas really imply to me some sort of matrix that was either heavily eroded host rock, or another, Iron based, mineral that formed first and then the Calcite filled in.

-Dave

__________________________________________________

Geologists on the whole are inconsistent drivers. When a roadcut presents itself, they tend to lurch and weave. To them, the roadcut is a portal, a fragment of a regional story, a proscenium arch that leads their imaginations into the earth and through the surrounding terrain. - John McPhee

If I'm going to drive safely, I can't do geology. - John McPhee

Check out my Blog for more fossils I've found: http://viewsofthemahantango.blogspot.com/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I found another piece and cut a slice to expose a non fractured part. Seems to verify the "inclusion" theory. I have had a suggestion from elsewhere that it might be a "wormhole" caused by acid solutions (Google wormholes in calcite) However that would produce a tree pattern with pointed branches, which is not the case. The inclusions are gathered to one side of the calcite layer.

inside xal1.jpg

inside xal2.jpg

inside xal4.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks POSSIBLY like ambient inclusion trails.

Edit: they have been found in/near Strelley Pool,Btw,as an example for the part of the globe you're coming from

below: image from 

Ambient Inclusion Trails:Their recognition,Age Range,and Applicability to early life on Earth

David Wacey,Matt Kilburn,Crispin Stoakes,Hugh Appleton,Martin Brasier

in:Dilek et al ,editor: Links between geological processes,Microbial activities and evolution of life/Springer publishing/2008

iaitmt5775taghed_8800ee466_7701.jpg

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...